Literature DB >> 25076192

Cervical Spine Motion during Transfer and Stabilization Techniques.

Ian Shrier, Patrick Boissy, Karina Lebel, John Boulay, Eli Segal, J Scott Delaney, L Charlene Vacon, Russell J Steele.   

Abstract

Abstract Objectives. To compare paramedics' ability to minimize cervical spine motion during patient transfer onto a vacuum mattress with two stabilization techniques (head squeeze vs. trap squeeze) and two transfer methods (log roll with one assistant (LR2) vs. 3 assistants (LR4)). Methods. We used a crossover design to minimize bias. Each lead paramedic performed 10 LR2 transfers and 10 LR4 transfers. For each of the 10 LR2 and 10 LR4 transfers, the lead paramedic stabilized the cervical spine using the head squeeze technique five times and the trap squeeze technique five times. We randomized the order of the stabilization techniques and LR2/LR4 across lead paramedics to avoid a practice or fatigue effect with repeated trials. We measured relative cervical spine motion between the head and trunk using inertial measurement units placed on the forehead and sternum. Results. On average, total motion was 3.9° less with three assistants compared to one assistant (p = 0.0002), and 2.8° less with the trap squeeze compared to the head squeeze (p = 0.002). There was no interaction between the transfer method and stabilization technique. When examining specific motions in the six directions, the trap squeeze generally produced less lateral flexion and rotation motion but allowed more extension. Examining within paramedic differences, some paramedics were clearly more proficient with the trap squeeze technique and others were clearly more proficient with the head squeeze technique. Conclusion. Paramedics performing a log roll with three assistants created less motion compared to a log roll with only one assistant, and using the trap squeeze stabilization technique resulted in less motion than the head squeeze technique but the clinical relevance of the magnitude remains unclear. However, large individual differences suggest future paramedic training should incorporate both best evidence practice as well as recognition that there may be individual differences between paramedics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical spine; injury; log roll; trap squeeze; vacuum

Year:  2014        PMID: 25076192     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.936634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  7 in total

1.  [Development and first application testing of a new protocol for preclinical spinal immobilization in children : Assessment of indications based on the E.M.S. IMMO Protocol Pediatric].

Authors:  Philip C Nolte; Davut D Uzun; Shiyao Liao; Matthias Kuch; Paul A Grützner; Matthias Münzberg; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Spinal movement and dural sac compression during airway management in a cadaveric model with atlanto-occipital instability.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Niko R E Schneider; Frank Weilbacher; Anne Stehr; Stefan Matschke; Paul A Grützner; Erik Popp; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Best Practices and Current Care Concepts in Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete in American Tackle Football March 2-3, 2019; Atlanta, GA.

Authors:  Ron Courson; James Ellis; Stanley A Herring; Barry P Boden; Glenn Henry; Darryl Conway; Lance McNamara; Timothy L Neal; Margot Putukian; Allen K Sills; Kimberly P Walpert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Removal of the cervical collar from alpine rescue protocols? A biomechanical non-inferiority trial in real-life mountain conditions.

Authors:  Guillaume Grenier; Marc-Antoine Despatis; Karina Lebel; Mathieu Hamel; Camille Martin; Patrick Boissy
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.803

5.  Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Niko R E Schneider; Petra Hüttlin; Paul A Grützner; Frank Weilbacher; Stefan Matschke; Erik Popp; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cadaveric study of movement in the unstable upper cervical spine during emergency management: tracheal intubation and cervical spine immobilisation-a study protocol for a prospective randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Erik Popp; Petra Hüttlin; Frank Weilbacher; Matthias Münzberg; Niko Schneider; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Quantitative Approach Based on Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess and Identify Motion and Errors in Techniques Used during Training of Transfers of Simulated c-Spine-Injured Patients.

Authors:  Karina Lebel; Vanessa Chenel; John Boulay; Patrick Boissy
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.