Literature DB >> 25074974

Standards for device implantation and follow-up: personnel, equipment, and facilities: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey.

Derick Todd1, Maria Grazia Bongiorni2, Antonio Hernandez-Madrid3, Nikolaos Dagres4, Elena Sciaraffia5, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist5.   

Abstract

Cardiac device implantation is the most common of all invasive cardiac electrophysiological procedures. Over 250 000 devices are implanted each year in Europe. The purpose of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the facilities, personnel, and protocols of members of the EHRA electrophysiology (EP) research network involved in device implantation. There were 68 responses to the questionnaire. The survey responses were mainly (84%) from medium- to high-volume device implanting centres, performing >200 implants per year, with over 50% performing >400 implants per year. Most consultants are male (85%), half of all centres had no female consultants, and only one in six had more than one female consultant. There is trend towards specialization in device implantation. The combination of device implantation and EP is still common (76% of all centres) but only 34% of centres have consultants performing device implantation and coronary intervention. Moreover, 23% of centres have all device implantation performed by consultants who do not perform any other types of procedure. Cardiac device implantation as a day case is the planned admission for routine elective device implantation in 30% of hospitals, 47% of hospitals have a single night stay, and 23% of hospitals have admission durations of two or more nights. Device implantation is available as a 24 h service, 365 days a year in 38% of hospitals. The commonest other model was as a daytime service on weekdays in 45% of hospitals. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  EHRA survey; EP wire; Equipment; Facilities; Implantable cardiac defibrillator; Pacemaker; Personnel

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25074974     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of Cardiac Lead Perforation: Comparison Among Chest Radiography, Transthoracic Echocardiography and Electrocardiography-gated Contrast-enhanced Cardiac CT.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Chushan Zheng; Peiwei Wang; Dongye Wang; Boshui Huang; Guozhao Li; Huijun Hu; Zehong Yang; Xiaohui Duan; Shaoxin Zheng; Pinming Liu; Jingfeng Wang; Jun Shen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Safety of same-day discharge versus overnight stay strategy following cardiac device implantations: a high-volume single-centre experience.

Authors:  Stefanos Archontakis; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Konstantinos Sideris; Ageliki Laina; Dimitra Tirovola; Dimitra Paraskevopoulou; Panagiotis Kostakis; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Petros Arsenos; Ioannis Ntalakouras; Emmanouil Charitakis; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Skevos Sideris
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Post procedural complications of cardiac implants done in a resource limited setting under 'C' arm: A single centre experience.

Authors:  A Jayachandra; Vivek Aggarwal; Sandeep Kumar; I V Nagesh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-12-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.