BACKGROUND: DNA methylation is an important type of epigenetic modification involved in gene regulation. Although strong DNA methylation at promoters is widely recognized to be associated with transcriptional repression, many aspects of DNA methylation remain not fully understood, including the quantitative relationships between DNA methylation and expression levels, and the individual roles of promoter and gene body methylation. RESULTS: Here we present an integrated analysis of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and RNA sequencing data from human samples and cell lines. We find that while promoter methylation inversely correlates with gene expression as generally observed, the repressive effect is clear only on genes with a very high DNA methylation level. By means of statistical modeling, we find that DNA methylation is indicative of the expression class of a gene in general, but gene body methylation is a better indicator than promoter methylation. These findings are general in that a model constructed from a sample or cell line could accurately fit the unseen data from another. We further find that promoter and gene body methylation have minimal redundancy, and either one is sufficient to signify low expression. Finally, we obtain increased modeling power by integrating histone modification data with the DNA methylation data, showing that neither type of information fully subsumes the other. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DNA methylation outside promoters also plays critical roles in gene regulation. Future studies on gene regulatory mechanisms and disease-associated differential methylation should pay more attention to DNA methylation at gene bodies and other non-promoter regions.
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation is an important type of epigenetic modification involved in gene regulation. Although strong DNA methylation at promoters is widely recognized to be associated with transcriptional repression, many aspects of DNA methylation remain not fully understood, including the quantitative relationships between DNA methylation and expression levels, and the individual roles of promoter and gene body methylation. RESULTS: Here we present an integrated analysis of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and RNA sequencing data from human samples and cell lines. We find that while promoter methylation inversely correlates with gene expression as generally observed, the repressive effect is clear only on genes with a very high DNA methylation level. By means of statistical modeling, we find that DNA methylation is indicative of the expression class of a gene in general, but gene body methylation is a better indicator than promoter methylation. These findings are general in that a model constructed from a sample or cell line could accurately fit the unseen data from another. We further find that promoter and gene body methylation have minimal redundancy, and either one is sufficient to signify low expression. Finally, we obtain increased modeling power by integrating histone modification data with the DNA methylation data, showing that neither type of information fully subsumes the other. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DNA methylation outside promoters also plays critical roles in gene regulation. Future studies on gene regulatory mechanisms and disease-associated differential methylation should pay more attention to DNA methylation at gene bodies and other non-promoter regions.
Authors: Ryan Lister; Ronan C O'Malley; Julian Tonti-Filippini; Brian D Gregory; Charles C Berry; A Harvey Millar; Joseph R Ecker Journal: Cell Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Tibor A Rauch; Xiwei Wu; Xueyan Zhong; Arthur D Riggs; Gerd P Pfeifer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Robert Illingworth; Alastair Kerr; Dina Desousa; Helle Jørgensen; Peter Ellis; Jim Stalker; David Jackson; Chris Clee; Robert Plumb; Jane Rogers; Sean Humphray; Tony Cox; Cordelia Langford; Adrian Bird Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Orsolya Galamb; Alexandra Kalmár; Bálint Péterfia; István Csabai; András Bodor; Dezső Ribli; Tibor Krenács; Árpád V Patai; Barnabás Wichmann; Barbara Kinga Barták; Kinga Tóth; Gábor Valcz; Sándor Spisák; Zsolt Tulassay; Béla Molnár Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Anne K Bozack; Andres Cardenas; John Geldhof; Quazi Quamruzzaman; Mahmuder Rahman; Golam Mostofa; David C Christiani; Molly L Kile Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 6.498