Milan S Geybels1,2, Shanshan Zhao1,3, Chao-Jen Wong1, Marina Bibikova4, Brandy Klotzle4, Michael Wu1, Elaine A Ostrander5, Jian-Bing Fan4, Ziding Feng6, Janet L Stanford1,7. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 2. Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. 3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 4. Illumina, Inc., San Diego, California. 5. Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland. 6. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation may promote prostate carcinogenesis. We investigated epigenome-wide DNA methylation profiles in prostate cancer (PCa) compared to adjacent benign tissue to identify differentially methylated CpG sites. METHODS: The study included paired PCa and adjacent benign tissue samples from 20 radical prostatectomy patients. Epigenetic profiling was done using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Linear models that accounted for the paired study design and False Discovery Rate Q-values were used to evaluate differential CpG methylation. mRNA expression levels of the genes with the most differentially methylated CpG sites were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 2,040 differentially methylated CpG sites were identified in PCa versus adjacent benign tissue (Q-value < 0.001), the majority of which were hypermethylated (n = 1,946; 95%). DNA methylation profiles accurately distinguished between PCa and benign tissue samples. Twenty-seven top-ranked hypermethylated CpGs had a mean methylation difference of at least 40% between tissue types, which included 25 CpGs in 17 genes. Furthermore, for 10 genes over 50% of promoter region CpGs were hypermethylated in PCa versus benign tissue. The top-ranked differentially methylated genes included three genes that were associated with both promoter hypermethylation and reduced gene expression: SCGB3A1, HIF3A, and AOX1. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data provided confirmatory evidence for our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This study of PCa versus adjacent benign tissue showed many differentially methylated CpGs and regions in and outside gene promoter regions, which may potentially be used for the development of future epigenetic-based diagnostic tests or as therapeutic targets.
BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation may promote prostate carcinogenesis. We investigated epigenome-wide DNA methylation profiles in prostate cancer (PCa) compared to adjacent benign tissue to identify differentially methylated CpG sites. METHODS: The study included paired PCa and adjacent benign tissue samples from 20 radical prostatectomy patients. Epigenetic profiling was done using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Linear models that accounted for the paired study design and False Discovery Rate Q-values were used to evaluate differential CpG methylation. mRNA expression levels of the genes with the most differentially methylated CpG sites were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 2,040 differentially methylated CpG sites were identified in PCa versus adjacent benign tissue (Q-value < 0.001), the majority of which were hypermethylated (n = 1,946; 95%). DNA methylation profiles accurately distinguished between PCa and benign tissue samples. Twenty-seven top-ranked hypermethylated CpGs had a mean methylation difference of at least 40% between tissue types, which included 25 CpGs in 17 genes. Furthermore, for 10 genes over 50% of promoter region CpGs were hypermethylated in PCa versus benign tissue. The top-ranked differentially methylated genes included three genes that were associated with both promoter hypermethylation and reduced gene expression: SCGB3A1, HIF3A, and AOX1. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data provided confirmatory evidence for our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This study of PCa versus adjacent benign tissue showed many differentially methylated CpGs and regions in and outside gene promoter regions, which may potentially be used for the development of future epigenetic-based diagnostic tests or as therapeutic targets.
Authors: Sun Jung Kim; William Kevin Kelly; Alan Fu; Kenneth Haines; Aaron Hoffman; Tongzhang Zheng; Yong Zhu Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Carmen Jerónimo; Patrick J Bastian; Anders Bjartell; Giuseppina M Carbone; James W F Catto; Susan J Clark; Rui Henrique; William G Nelson; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-06-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: J M Devaney; S Wang; S Funda; J Long; D J Taghipour; R Tbaishat; P Furbert-Harris; M Ittmann; B Kwabi-Addo Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Carolyn J Vivian; Amanda E Brinker; Stefan Graw; Devin C Koestler; Christophe Legendre; Gerald C Gooden; Bodour Salhia; Danny R Welch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Chol-Hee Jung; Ee Ming Wong; Liesel M FitzGerald; JiHoon E Joo; Jodee A Gould; Vivien Vasic; Julie K Bassett; Neil O'Callaghan; Tim Nottle; John Pedersen; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Anbarasu Kumaraswamy; Katherine R Welker Leng; Thomas C Westbrook; Joel A Yates; Shuang G Zhao; Christopher P Evans; Felix Y Feng; Todd M Morgan; Joshi J Alumkal Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2021-03-27 Impact factor: 24.267
Authors: Milan S Geybels; Joshi J Alumkal; Manuel Luedeke; Antje Rinckleb; Shanshan Zhao; Irene M Shui; Marina Bibikova; Brandy Klotzle; Piet A van den Brandt; Elaine A Ostrander; Jian-Bing Fan; Ziding Feng; Christiane Maier; Janet L Stanford Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2015-12-12 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Irene M Shui; Chao-Jen Wong; Shanshan Zhao; Suzanne Kolb; Ericka M Ebot; Milan S Geybels; Rohina Rubicz; Jonathan L Wright; Daniel W Lin; Brandy Klotzle; Marina Bibikova; Jian-Bing Fan; Elaine A Ostrander; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 6.921