Literature DB >> 25072853

Stimulus motion improves spatial contrast sensitivity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Nicola Kristin Haller1, Olle Lind2, Stephan Steinlechner3, Almut Kelber4.   

Abstract

Birds are generally thought to have excellent vision with high spatial resolution. However, spatial contrast sensitivity of birds for stationary targets is low compared to other animals with similar acuity, such as mammals. For fast flying animals body stability and coordination are highly important, and visual motion cues are known to be relevant for flight control. We have tested five budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) in behavioural discrimination experiments to determine whether or not stimulus motion improves contrast sensitivity. The birds were trained to distinguish between a homogenous grey field and sine-wave gratings of spatial frequencies between 0.48 and 6.5 cyc/deg, and Michelson contrasts between 0.7% and 99%. The gratings were either stationary or drifting with velocities between 0.9 and 13 deg/s. Budgerigars were able to discriminate patterns of lower contrast from grey when the gratings were drifting, and the improvement in sensitivity was strongest at lower spatial frequencies and higher drift velocities. Our findings indicate that motion cues can have positive effects on visual perception of birds. This is similar to earlier results on human vision. Contrast sensitivity, tested solely with stationary stimuli, underestimates the sensory capacity of budgerigars flying through their natural environments.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bird vision; Budgerigar; Motion perception; Motion vision; Spatial contrast sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072853     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  How lovebirds maneuver through lateral gusts with minimal visual information.

Authors:  Daniel Quinn; Daniel Kress; Eric Chang; Andrea Stein; Michal Wegrzynski; David Lentink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High resolution of colour vision, but low contrast sensitivity in a diurnal raptor.

Authors:  Simon Potier; Mindaugas Mitkus; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spatial Vision in Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Aravin Chakravarthi; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  High contrast sensitivity for visually guided flight control in bumblebees.

Authors:  Aravin Chakravarthi; Almut Kelber; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Response time of an avian prey to a simulated hawk attack is slower in darker conditions, but is independent of hawk colour morph.

Authors:  Carina Nebel; Petra Sumasgutner; Adrien Pajot; Arjun Amar
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Biomechanics of the Peacock's Display: How Feather Structure and Resonance Influence Multimodal Signaling.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; Owen McCrossan; James F Hare; Robert Montgomerie; Suzanne Amador Kane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Visual acuity of budgerigars for moving targets.

Authors:  Sandra Chaib; Juliane Gaviraghi Mussoi; Olle Lind; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.422

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.