| Literature DB >> 25071702 |
Elham Rostami1, Henrik Engquist2, Per Enblad3.
Abstract
Ischemia is a common and deleterious secondary injury following traumatic brain injury (TBI). A great challenge for the treatment of TBI patients in the neurointensive care unit (NICU) is to detect early signs of ischemia in order to prevent further advancement and deterioration of the brain tissue. Today, several imaging techniques are available to monitor cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the injured brain such as positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography, xenon computed tomography (Xenon-CT), perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT perfusion scan. An ideal imaging technique would enable continuous non-invasive measurement of blood flow and metabolism across the whole brain. Unfortunately, no current imaging method meets all these criteria. These techniques offer snapshots of the CBF. MRI may also provide some information about the metabolic state of the brain. PET provides images with high resolution and quantitative measurements of CBF and metabolism; however, it is a complex and costly method limited to few TBI centers. All of these methods except mobile Xenon-CT require transfer of TBI patients to the radiological department. Mobile Xenon-CT emerges as a feasible technique to monitor CBF in the NICU, with lower risk of adverse effects. Promising results have been demonstrated with Xenon-CT in predicting outcome in TBI patients. This review covers available imaging methods used to monitor CBF in patients with severe TBI.Entities:
Keywords: Xenon-CT; brain injury; cerebral blood flow; imaging; neurointensive care
Year: 2014 PMID: 25071702 PMCID: PMC4083561 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Presents a summary of publications using Xenon-CT, PET, perfusion CT, perfusion-MRI, and comparative studies using different imaging modalities.
| Reference | Subject | Additional monitoring | Time post-injury | GCS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yonas et al. ( | CBF and TBI | 1 | GCS ≤8 | ||
| Langfitt et al. ( | Imaging pathology and neuropsychological tests (133Xe) | MRI, PET, CT, Xenon-133 | Acute and 6 months | 3 | GCS ≤13 |
| Latchaw et al. ( | CBF in different types of TBI | During NIC stay | 35 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Marion et al. ( | Xenon-CT and ICP | Within 7 days | 23 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Schalen et al. ( | CBF and hyperventilation response (133Xe) | Jugbulb | During NIC stay | 38 | GCS ≤8 |
| Marion et al. ( | CBF following TBI | 1 h–7 days | 32 | GCS ≤7 | |
| Bouma et al. ( | Early measurement of CBF in TBI | Jugbulb | First 24 h | 186 | GCS ≤8 |
| Bouma et al. ( | CBF in acute phase of severe TBI | 3 h | 35 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Bouma et al. ( | Autoregulation test (133Xe) | First days | 47 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Stringer et al. ( | CBF and hyperventilation | During NIC stay | 12 | ||
| Bouma and Muizelaar ( | Xenon-CT evaluation in TBI | ||||
| McLaughlin and Marion ( | CBF and vasoresponsivity in contusions | 24–48 h | 10 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Kelly et al. ( | CBF and outcome (133Xe) | 1–5 days | 54 | GCS ≤12 | |
| Schroder et al. ( | Relation of CBV and CBF to explain cause of ischemia | Dynamic CT imaging (CBV) | 24 h | 51 | GCS ≤8 |
| Bouma et al. ( | Underlying cause of cerebral swelling | Dynamic CT imaging (CBV) | Early posttrauma | 37 | |
| Doppenberg et al. ( | Relation of potassium, glutamate, lactate, and CBF | Microdialysis | 70 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Kushi et al. ( | CBF, C02, pH and CMR02 as prognostic indicator | Jugbulb | 22 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Hoelper et al. ( | rCBF and contusions | 29 and 94 h | 44 | GCS ≤8 | |
| von Oettingen et al. ( | TBI and pulmonary trauma, xenon concentration and CBF | 5 | |||
| Schutt et al. ( | Thermo-dye-dilution and Xenon-CT | Thermo-dye-dilution | 1–5 days | 16 | GCS ≤8 |
| Valadka et al. ( | CBF and pbr02 | pbr02 | 18 | GCS ≤6 | |
| Furuya et al. ( | CBF and hypodense area | 50 | GCS ≤8 | ||
| Chieregato et al. ( | rCBF in traumatic hemorrhagic contusions | 14 | GCS ≤9 | ||
| Chieregato et al. ( | CBF and hypertension | 7 | GCS ≤8 | ||
| Chieregato et al. ( | Recovery of CBF in tICH | First 20 day | 22 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Inoue et al. ( | CBF and 6 months outcome | 1,2, 3, 4, 6 weeks | 20 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Chieregato et al. ( | CBF in hematomas and traumatic contusions | 43 | GCS ≤8 | ||
| Poon et al. ( | C02 reactivity and cerebral hemodynamics | TCD, ICP, Microdialysis | 35 | GCS ≤12 | |
| Marmarou et al. ( | Type of edema in diffuse and focal TBI | DWI, MR | 45 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Chieregato et al. ( | CBF and CPP levels | Jugbulb | During NIC stay | 237 | GCS ≤8 |
| Masaoka ( | CBF during hypothermia | Jugbulb | 1–4 days | 30 | GCS ≤8 |
| Robertson et al. ( | Genetic polymorphism of N03 and CBF | 12 and 48 h | 51 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Kaloostian et al. ( | Outcome prediction within 12 h following TBI | 12 h | 120 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Shafer et al. ( | CBF and oxygen saturation | INVOS | During NIC stay | 22 | “Intubated” |
| Bergsneider et al. ( | Cerebral hyperglycolysis in TBI patients | 1–24 h | 28 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Hattori et al. ( | Metabolic rate of glucose and level of consciousness | 1–5 days | 23 | GCS ≤15 | |
| Coles et al. ( | Measurement of ischemic lesion | 1–24 h | 12 | GCS ≤12 | |
| Coles et al. ( | Ischemic brain volume and outcome | 1–72 h | 15 | GCS ≤12 | |
| Hattori et al. ( | characterize contusional, pericontusional, and remote regions in TBI | 1–5 days | 21 | GCS 3-15 | |
| Wu et al. ( | Metabolic rate of glucose in gray matter | 1–4 days | 14 | GCS ≤14 | |
| Cunningham et al. ( | Threshold for irreversible tissue damage | 1–5 days | 14 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Vespa et al. ( | Microdialysis and PET | Mean 36 h | 19 | GCS ≤14 | |
| Abdel-Dayem et al. ( | SPECT correlated to CT | 24 h | 14 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Roper et al. ( | SPECT correlated to CT | 72 h | 15 | GCS ≤15 | |
| Ito et al. ( | Cerebral perfusion in diffuse brain injury and relationship to atrophy | Within 1 week and 1–6 months | 8 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Wintermark et al. ( | Correlation of CPP and CBF | 61 | GCS ≤8 | ||
| Wintermark et al. ( | Prognostic value of admission CBF | At admission | 130 | GCS ≤10 | |
| Soustiel et al. ( | Prognostic value of admission CBF | At admission and l week | 30 | GCS ≤9 | |
| Huang et al. ( | Progression of cerebral contusions | 1–6 h | 22 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Bendinelli et al. ( | CBF within the first 48 h following TBI | 1–48 h | 30 | GCS ≤8 | |
| Garnett et al. ( | rCVB in contusion | 2–19 days | 18 | GCS ≤8 vs. ≥9 | |
| Hagen et al. ( | Comparison PW-MRI and Xenon-CT | 1–24 h | 10 | Stenosis, HCF, atrophy | |
| Rempp et al. ( | PW-MRI and PET in healthy subjects | 12 | NC | ||
| Gillard et al. ( | Comparison CTP and PET in AVM and gliomas | 8 | 8 AVM, 2 glioma | ||
| Campbell et al. ( | Comparison PW-MRI and perfusion CT in ischemic stroke | 3–6 h | 49 | Acute stroke | |
CBF, cerebral blood flow; ICP, intracranial pressure; CPP, cerebral perfusion pressure; CT, computer tomography; rCBV, regional cerebral blood flow; tICH, traumatic intracranial hematoma; pbrO2, partial brain oxygen tension; Jugbulb, jugular bulb; INVOS, brain tissue oxygen saturation.