Literature DB >> 33728108

The Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Upon Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ioannis Koukoulithras1, Alexandra Stamouli2, Spyridon Kolokotsios2, Minas Plexousakis2, Christine Mavrogiannopoulou2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a very common pathology among pregnant women and various methods are used to reduce the pain. The aim of this study is to conduct an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness of the interventions used to reduce low back pain related to pregnancy.  Methods and materials: The PEDro database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2012 until December 2020 as well as the reference lists from identified articles. Studies of any non-pharmaceutical treatment to decrease low back pain were included but only randomized controlled trials were selected. The articles found were screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) question. Details about the type of intervention, sample size, outcome measures, results, and statistical significance were extracted from the selected studies. A meta-analysis for pain intensity was conducted and the I2 index as well as x2 test were used to determine the heterogeneity between studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out. The aim was to compare the effectiveness between various methods and the typical care provided on low back pain during pregnancy. 
Results: From all the articles found in the mentioned databases only 13 studies met the criteria. In these studies, exercise, manipulation, ear acupuncture, Kinesio tape, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and neuroemotional technique were the interventions used. In the meta-analysis, six studies with 693 participants were included. The interventions were found to have in total a statistically significant effect on low back pain in comparison with the control group that included the typical care provided to pregnant women (95%CI: 0.08 (0.02,0.31), p<0,01) and they had a high heterogeneity (considerable, Tau² = 2.70; Chi² = 64.11, I² = 91%). Exercise and TENS were determined as more effective than the other types of interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: TENS and progressive muscle relaxation exercises accompanied by music were found to be the most effective interventions. Although exercise decreased LBP it was not found to have a statistically significant result even though it seems to improve the disability and quality of life of pregnant women. Osteopathic manual treatment (OMT), Kinesio tape, and ear acupuncture affected the lumbar pain intensity but the difference compared to typical care or sham treatment was not statistically significant, while yoga did not improve pregnancy-related LBP. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the interventions mentioned.
Copyright © 2021, Koukoulithras et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interventions; low back pain; pain management; pregnancy; rehabilitation; systematic review and meta analysis; therapeutics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728108      PMCID: PMC7934802          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  27 in total

1.  Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Christopher G Maher; Catherine Sherrington; Robert D Herbert; Anne M Moseley; Mark Elkins
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-08

2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves low back pain during pregnancy.

Authors:  E A Keskin; O Onur; H L Keskin; I I Gumus; H Kafali; N Turhan
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  P Katonis; A Kampouroglou; A Aggelopoulos; K Kakavelakis; S Lykoudis; A Makrigiannakis; K Alpantaki
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Effect of ear acupuncture on pregnancy-related pain in the lower back and posterior pelvic girdle: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jorge Vas; María Carmen Cintado; José Manuel Aranda-Regules; Inmaculada Aguilar; Francisco Rivas Ruiz
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back and pelvic girdle pain during and after pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Helge Franke; Jan-David Franke; Sebastian Belz; Gary Fryer
Journal:  J Bodyw Mov Ther       Date:  2017-05-31

6.  Low back pain during pregnancy in Iranian women: Prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Scott Hasson; Soofia Naghdi; Sousan Keyhani; Shohreh Jalaie
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Understanding and managing the back pain of pregnancy.

Authors:  Hans L Carlson; Nels L Carlson; Bryan A Pasternak; Keith D Balderston
Journal:  Curr Womens Health Rep       Date:  2003-02

8.  A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  Caroline D Peterson; Mitchell Haas; W Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-06-13

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Larissa Shamseer; Mike Clarke; Davina Ghersi; Alessandro Liberati; Mark Petticrew; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-01

10.  Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Women with Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Şeyhmus Kaplan; Mahmut Alpayci; Erbil Karaman; Orkun Çetin; Yasemin Özkan; Server İlter; Volkan Şah; Hanım Güler Şahin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Decreased Risk of Low Back Pain During Pregnancy Associated With the Use of Orthopedic Manual Therapy: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Wei-Chiao Chang; Hanoch Livneh; Chieh-Tsung Yen; Min-Chih Hsieh; Ming-Chi Lu; Wei-Jen Chen; Tzung-Yi Tsai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.