Literature DB >> 25066869

A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience.

Anup Kumar1, Niraj Kumar2, Pawan Vasudeva2, Sanjeev Kumar Jha2, Rohit Kumar2, Harbinder Singh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for the treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi was done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a single 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal stone who underwent treatment between January 2012 and May 2013 were included in study. They were randomized to shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc groups. Patient demographic profiles, success and re-treatment rates, auxiliary procedures and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 45 patients were enrolled in each of the shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc groups. Three, 2 and 4 patients, respectively, were excluded from final analysis due to a matrix stone diagnosis. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were significantly greater in the miniperc group than in the other groups. Hospital stay (3.1 days vs 3.1 hours and 1.3 days, p = 0.01) and the blood transfusion rate (13.3% vs 0% and 0%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher for miniperc vs shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery, respectively. The re-treatment rate (63.4% vs 2.1% and 2.2%, p <0.001) and the auxiliary procedure rate (20.2% vs 8.8% and 6.6%, p = 0.02) were significantly greater for shock wave lithotripsy than for retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc, respectively. The 3-month stone-free rate of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc was 73.8% (31 of 42 patients), 86.1% (37 of 43) and 95.1% (39 of 41), respectively (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Miniperc and retrograde intrarenal surgery were more effective than shock wave lithotripsy to treat 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi in terms of a better stone-free rate, and lesser auxiliary and re-treatment rates. However, miniperc resulted in more complications, greater operative time and radiation exposure, and a longer hospital stay.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney; lithotripsy; nephrolithiasis; nephrostomy; operative; percutaneous; surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25066869     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

Review 1.  Precision Stone Surgery: Current Status of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  John M DiBianco; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Ken Anson; Guido Giusti; Michael Grasso; Guido Kamphuis; Sven Lahme; Evangelos Liatsikos; Anup Patel; Margaret S Pearle; Luc Valiquette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammed A Elbaset; Abdelwahab Hashem; Ahmed Eraky; Mohammed A Badawy; Ahmed El-Assmy; Khaled Z Sheir; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive ("Mini") Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Classification, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Sasha C Druskin; Justin B Ziemba
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Arman Tsaturyan; Marco Lattarulo; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-06-05

Review 6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric age group: Assessment of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  Ender Ozden; Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-06

7.  Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  José D Cabrera; Braulio O Manzo; José E Torres; Fabio C Vicentini; Héctor M Sánchez; Ernesto A Rojas; Edgard Lozada
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment for renal stones 1-2 cm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changjian Zheng; Hongmei Yang; Jun Luo; Bo Xiong; Hongzhi Wang; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile.

Authors:  N F Davis; M R Quinlan; C Poyet; N Lawrentschuk; D M Bolton; D Webb; G S Jack
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Mi; Kewei Ren; Haiyan Pan; Lijie Zhu; Sheng Wu; Xiaoming You; Hongbao Shao; Feng Dai; Tao Peng; Feng Qin; Jian Wang; Yi Huang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.