Literature DB >> 30944968

Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial.

Mohammed A Elbaset1, Abdelwahab Hashem2, Ahmed Eraky3, Mohammed A Badawy4, Ahmed El-Assmy1, Khaled Z Sheir1, Ahmed A Shokeir1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral dissolution therapy (ODT), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and combined SWL and ODT for medium-sized radiolucent renal stone (RLS).
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial for patients with medium-sized RLS, 1-2.5 cm, ≤ 500 Hounsfield unit (HU). The ODT patients were counseled for oral potassiumsodium-hydrogen citrate (Uralyt-U®). The 2nd group underwent SWL and the last group had combined SWL and ODT. The primary outcome, stone-free rate (SFR) at 3 months, was assessed by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). We defined complete response (success) if no residual fragment were detected by NCCT; partial response (failure) if there was a decrease in stone size, but presence of residual stones; no response if there was no change or increase in stone size (failure).
RESULTS: 150 patients completed follow-up. The SFR at 1st month and 3rd month were, respectively; 16% and 50% in the ODT group, 10% and 46% in the SWL group, and 35% and 72% patients in combined group with (p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively. The overall SFR for all groups was 66%. Combined treatment and initial response in first month follow-up were independent factors predicting SFR. In addition, combined treatment significantly decreased the overall stone volume (p = 0.03) and the need for additional stone management procedures after 3 months (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Combined ODT and SWL treatment constitutes the most rapid and effective therapeutic approach for medium-sized RLS, decreasing overall stone volume as well as the number of SWL sessions needed in comparison to SWL therapy, alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dissolution therapy; Radiolucent stones; Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL); Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30944968     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02746-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; David S Goldfarb; Dean G Assimos; Gary Curhan; Cynthia J Denu-Ciocca; Brian R Matlaga; Manoj Monga; Kristina L Penniston; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas M T Turk; James R White
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Guideline of guidelines: kidney stones.

Authors:  Justin B Ziemba; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Automated Computer Software Compared with Manual Measurements for CT-Based Urinary Stone Metrics: An Evaluation Study.

Authors:  John Roger Bell; Natasza M Posielski; Kristina L Penniston; Meghan G Lubner; Stephen Y Nakada; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Dissolution therapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for radiolucent renal stones in children: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ahmad A Elderwy; Adel Kurkar; AlMontaser Hussein; Hazem Abozeid; Hisham M Hammodda; Abdel-Fatah Ibraheim
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Imaging in Urolithiasis.

Authors:  William R Masch; Kevin C Cronin; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 6.  Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management.

Authors:  Orson W Moe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Utility of oral dissolution therapy in the management of referred patients with secondarily treated uric acid stones.

Authors:  Michael E Moran; Harrison M Abrahams; David E Burday; Tricia D Greene
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Results of urinary dissolution therapy for radiolucent calculi.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; Kumar Prabhu; Prasanna Venkatesh; Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Tevfik Ziypak; Akif Diri; Gokhan Atis; Selcuk Guven; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Derya Oztuna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Dissolution of radiolucent renal stones by oral alkalinization with potassium citrate/potassium bicarbonate.

Authors:  Alberto Trinchieri; Nicola Esposito; Chiara Castelnuovo
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2009-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of stenting prior to oral chemolysis of upper urinary tract uric acid stones.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Piet Bosshard; Elizaveta Bokova; Olivier Bonny; Kevin Stritt; Beat Roth
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparison potassium sodium hydrogen citrate with sodium bicarbonate in urine alkalization: a prospective crossover-controlled trial.

Authors:  Wen Xue; Jiafen Cheng; Jing Zhao; Ling Wang; Ai Peng; Xinying Liu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Oral chemolysis is an effective, non-invasive therapy for urinary stones suspected of uric acid content.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Elizaveta Bokova; Piet Bosshard; Olivier Bonny; Daniel G Fuster; Beat Roth
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.