Robyn Sysko1, Tom B Hildebrandt2, Simona Kaplan3, Stephanie K Brewer3, Jeffrey L Zitsman4, Michael J Devlin3. 1. Columbia Center for Eating Disorders, Division of Clinical Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York. Electronic address: syskor@nyspi.columbia.edu. 2. Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 3. Columbia Center for Eating Disorders, Division of Clinical Therapeutics, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York. 4. Center for Adolescent Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adherence behaviors have not been examined among adolescents undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). In addition, studies of youth receiving bariatric surgery have not considered the influence of psychopathology on postoperative adherence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors and correlates of adherence to post-surgery visits among a sample of adolescents undergoing LAGB. METHODS: Postoperative visits with surgical staff were analyzed over the 2 years after surgery (n = 101 adolescents). Growth mixture modeling examined trends in adherence. RESULTS: A 3-class solution provided the best fit to the data. The classes from the final model were characterized by class 1 (61.6%) demonstrating high levels of adherence over the 24 months after LAGB, class 2 (28.5%) showing a more gradual decline in adherence, and class 3 (9.9%) with an accelerated decline in adherence. Higher levels of preoperative depressive symptoms and more preoperative episodes of loss of control overeating decreased the likelihood of adherence. Class 3 adolescents had significantly higher estimated 24-month body mass indices than classes 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: Variable patterns of follow-up visit adherence were identified among adolescents receiving LAGB, which were predicted by depressive symptoms and loss of control overeating. The trajectory characterized by a rapid decline in adherence to follow-up visits was also associated with less weight loss.
BACKGROUND: Adherence behaviors have not been examined among adolescents undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). In addition, studies of youth receiving bariatric surgery have not considered the influence of psychopathology on postoperative adherence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors and correlates of adherence to post-surgery visits among a sample of adolescents undergoing LAGB. METHODS: Postoperative visits with surgical staff were analyzed over the 2 years after surgery (n = 101 adolescents). Growth mixture modeling examined trends in adherence. RESULTS: A 3-class solution provided the best fit to the data. The classes from the final model were characterized by class 1 (61.6%) demonstrating high levels of adherence over the 24 months after LAGB, class 2 (28.5%) showing a more gradual decline in adherence, and class 3 (9.9%) with an accelerated decline in adherence. Higher levels of preoperative depressive symptoms and more preoperative episodes of loss of control overeating decreased the likelihood of adherence. Class 3 adolescents had significantly higher estimated 24-month body mass indices than classes 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: Variable patterns of follow-up visit adherence were identified among adolescents receiving LAGB, which were predicted by depressive symptoms and loss of control overeating. The trajectory characterized by a rapid decline in adherence to follow-up visits was also associated with less weight loss.
Authors: Meghan M Sinton; Andrea B Goldschmidt; Vandana Aspen; Kelly R Theim; Richard I Stein; Brian E Saelens; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2011-06-22
Authors: Mona Sharifi; Eileen M Dryden; Christine M Horan; Sarah Price; Richard Marshall; Karen Hacker; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Elsie M Taveras Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Janey S A Pratt; Allen Browne; Nancy T Browne; Matias Bruzoni; Megan Cohen; Ashish Desai; Thomas Inge; Bradley C Linden; Samer G Mattar; Marc Michalsky; David Podkameni; Kirk W Reichard; Fatima Cody Stanford; Meg H Zeller; Jeffrey Zitsman Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Kristina M Decker; Jennifer Reiter-Purtill; Carolina M Bejarano; Andrea B Goldschmidt; James E Mitchell; Todd M Jenkins; Michael Helmrath; Thomas H Inge; Marc P Michalsky; Meg H Zeller Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2022-01-22
Authors: Afaf F Moustafa; Kerry M Quigley; Thomas A Wadden; Robert I Berkowitz; Ariana M Chao Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Michał Orłowski; Michał Janik; Paula Franczak; Agata Frask; Maciej Michalik Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 1.195