OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether race disparities in physical inactivity are present among urban low-income Blacks and Whites living in similar social context. DESIGN: This analysis included Black and White respondents ( > or = 18 years) from the Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities-Southwest Baltimore (EHDIC-SWB; N=1350) Study and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS; N = 67790). Respondents who reported no levels of moderate or vigorous physical activity, during leisure time, over a usual week were considered physically inactive. RESULTS: After controlling for confounders, Blacks had higher adjusted odds of physical inactivity compared to Whites in the national sample (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.30-1.51). In EHDIC-SWB, Blacks and Whites had a similar odds of physical inactivity (OR = 1.09; 95% CI .86-1.40). CONCLUSION: Social context contributes to our understanding of racial disparities in physical inactivity.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether race disparities in physical inactivity are present among urban low-income Blacks and Whites living in similar social context. DESIGN: This analysis included Black and White respondents ( > or = 18 years) from the Exploring Health Disparities in Integrated Communities-Southwest Baltimore (EHDIC-SWB; N=1350) Study and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS; N = 67790). Respondents who reported no levels of moderate or vigorous physical activity, during leisure time, over a usual week were considered physically inactive. RESULTS: After controlling for confounders, Blacks had higher adjusted odds of physical inactivity compared to Whites in the national sample (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.30-1.51). In EHDIC-SWB, Blacks and Whites had a similar odds of physical inactivity (OR = 1.09; 95% CI .86-1.40). CONCLUSION: Social context contributes to our understanding of racial disparities in physical inactivity.
Authors: Hidde P van der Ploeg; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Alison L Marshall; Cora Craig; Maria Hagströmer; Michael Sjöström; Adrian Bauman Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Thomas LaVeist; Roland Thorpe; Terra Bowen-Reid; John Jackson; Tiffany Gary; Darrell Gaskin; Dorothy Browne Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Simon J Marshall; Deborah A Jones; Barbara E Ainsworth; Jared P Reis; Susan S Levy; Caroline A Macera Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Emily Rose N San Diego; Nikhil A Ahuja; Brandi M Johnson; Cardella L Leak; George Relyea; Jonathan C Lewis; Niels French; Brook E Harmon Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2021-01-02
Authors: Min Hee Kim; Gabriel L Schwartz; Justin S White; M Maria Glymour; Sean F Reardon; Kiarri N Kershaw; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Daniel F Collin; Pushkar P Inamdar; Guangyi Wang; Rita Hamad Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Sarah E Linke; Britta A Larsen; Becky Marquez; Andrea Mendoza-Vasconez; Bess H Marcus Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2016-03-06 Impact factor: 8.194
Authors: Jasper Most; L Anne Gilmore; Abby D Altazan; Marshall St Amant; Robbie A Beyl; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Clare M Lenhart; Andrew Wiemken; Alexandra Hanlon; Mackenzie Perkett; Freda Patterson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.295