PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine 1) prevalence of leisure-time physical inactivity in a nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic men and women; 2) prevalence of leisure-time inactivity by racial/ethnic group across social class indicators; and 3) the relationship between leisure-time inactivity and occupational physical activity, independent of other social class indicators. METHODS: The National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey was a telephone survey of noninstitutionalized U.S. adults (4695 men, 6516 women) conducted by random digit dialing between September and December 2002. Self-reported physical activity was assessed using questions from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Respondents who reported no moderate- or vigorous-intensity physical activity during leisure time in a usual week were classified as inactive. Indicators of social class were education, family income, employment status, and marital status. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prevalence of leisure-time inactivity was 9.9% +/- 0.6 SE (standard error) and 12.0 +/- 0.6 for white men and women, respectively; 19.0 +/- 2.5 and 25.2 +/- 2.1 for non-Hispanic black men and women, and 20.9 +/- 2.1 and 27.3 +/- 2.5 for Hispanic men and women. Within each racial/ethnic group, prevalence of leisure-time inactivity was highest among participants of lower social class. Differences in inactivity by racial/ethnic group were less evident after adjustment for social class. Odds of inactivity were similar across quartiles of occupational physical activity after adjustment for age, sex, and social class. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics were more inactive during their leisure time than were non-Hispanic whites. Social class but not occupational physical activity seems to moderate the relationship between race/ethnicity and leisure-time physical inactivity.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine 1) prevalence of leisure-time physical inactivity in a nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic men and women; 2) prevalence of leisure-time inactivity by racial/ethnic group across social class indicators; and 3) the relationship between leisure-time inactivity and occupational physical activity, independent of other social class indicators. METHODS: The National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey was a telephone survey of noninstitutionalized U.S. adults (4695 men, 6516 women) conducted by random digit dialing between September and December 2002. Self-reported physical activity was assessed using questions from the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Respondents who reported no moderate- or vigorous-intensity physical activity during leisure time in a usual week were classified as inactive. Indicators of social class were education, family income, employment status, and marital status. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prevalence of leisure-time inactivity was 9.9% +/- 0.6 SE (standard error) and 12.0 +/- 0.6 for white men and women, respectively; 19.0 +/- 2.5 and 25.2 +/- 2.1 for non-Hispanic black men and women, and 20.9 +/- 2.1 and 27.3 +/- 2.5 for Hispanic men and women. Within each racial/ethnic group, prevalence of leisure-time inactivity was highest among participants of lower social class. Differences in inactivity by racial/ethnic group were less evident after adjustment for social class. Odds of inactivity were similar across quartiles of occupational physical activity after adjustment for age, sex, and social class. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics were more inactive during their leisure time than were non-Hispanic whites. Social class but not occupational physical activity seems to moderate the relationship between race/ethnicity and leisure-time physical inactivity.
Authors: Rebecca E Lee; Scherezade K Mama; Ashley V Medina; Jacqueline Y Reese-Smith; Jorge A Banda; Charles S Layne; Meggin Baxter; Daniel P O'Connor; Lorna McNeill; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: J Community Health Date: 2011-12
Authors: Maciej S Buchowski; Charles E Matthews; Sarah S Cohen; Lisa B Signorello; Jay H Fowke; Margaret K Hargreaves; David G Schlundt; William J Blot Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-08-02
Authors: Sabina B Gesell; Erica B Reynolds; Edward H Ip; Lindy C Fenlason; Stephen J Pont; Eli K Poe; Shari L Barkin Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Lynn Rosenberg; Jeffrey Yu; Julie R Palmer; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Mario R Azevedo; Bernardo L Horta; Denise P Gigante; Cesar G Victora; Fernando C Barros Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Joellen Wilbur; Edward Wang; Judith McDevitt; April Oh; Richard Block; Sue McNeil; Nina Savar Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2008-07-31
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Jenifer E Allsworth; Bess H Marcus; Jana Hesser; Kate L Lapane Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.308