Literature DB >> 25064409

Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Talia Eldar-Geva1, Naama Srebnik2, Gheona Altarescu3, Irit Varshaver4, Baruch Brooks4, Ephrat Levy-Lahad3, Ruben Bromiker5, Michael S Schimmel5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) influences neonatal outcomes.
DESIGN: Prospective follow-up cohort.
SETTING: Tertiary university-affiliated medical center. PATIENT(S): 242 children born after PGD, 242 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (158 singletons and 42 twins pairs in each group), and 733 children born after a spontaneous conception (SC) (493 singletons, 120 twins pairs), matched for maternal age, parity, and body mass index. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gestational age, birth weight, prematurity (<37 and <34 weeks), low birth weight (<2,500 g, very low birth weight, <1,500 g), and intrauterine growth restriction (<10th percentile for gestational age). RESULT(S): For singletons, the mean birth weight was higher after SC compared with ICSI but not compared with PGD. Mean gestational ages were lower after PGD and ICSI compared with SC. The low birth weight and intrauterine growth restriction rates were 4.4%, 12.0%, and 5.7% and 5.1%, 9.5%, and 5.5% for PGD, ICSI, and SC, respectively. Similar results were found when controlled for the number of embryos transferred and cryopreservation. The results for twins exhibited similar but less statistically significant trends. Polar body and blastomere biopsies provided similar outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo biopsy itself did not cause intrauterine growth restriction or low birth weight compared with SC, despite lower gestational ages with PGD. The worsened outcomes in ICSI compared with PGD pregnancies may be due to the infertility itself.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo biopsy; genetic diagnosis; intrauterine growth restriction; neonatal outcome; preimplantation; prematurity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25064409     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  The clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the patient affected by congenital contractural arachnodactyly and spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Linjun Chen; Zhenyu Diao; Zhipeng Xu; Jianjun Zhou; Wanjun Wang; Jie Li; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kristopher I Kapphahn; Raquel R Fleischmann; Qianying Zhao; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 4.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The effect of blastomere loss during frozen embryo transfer on the transcriptome of offspring's umbilical cord blood.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Wu; Ze-Han Dong; Cheng Li; Dai-Zhan Zhou; Jun-Yu Zhang; Yan Wu; Jing-Jing Xu; Yu Wang; Xiao-Qun Ye; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Li Wang; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Embryo biopsy and maternal and neonatal outcomes following cryopreserved-thawed single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Cynthia K Sites; Sophia Bachilova; Daksha Gopal; Howard J Cabral; Charles C Coddington; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 7.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Expanded carrier screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a couple who delivered a baby affected with congenital factor VII deficiency.

Authors:  Wen-Bin He; Yue-Qiu Tan; Xiao Hu; Wen Li; Bo Xiong; Ke-Li Luo; Fei Gong; Guang-Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Juan Du
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 9.  The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Catello Scarica; Antonio Palagiano; Rita Canipari; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Congenital Malformations in Infants of Mothers Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study.

Authors:  Hayedeh Hoorsan; Parvin Mirmiran; Shahla Chaichian; Yousef Moradi; Roza Hoorsan; Fatemeh Jesmi
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.