Literature DB >> 25063492

Prosbiotate: a multicenter, prospective analysis of infectious complications after prostate biopsy.

Franck Bruyère1, Sandra Malavaud2, Philippe Bertrand3, Aliette Decock4, Gérard Cariou5, Jean Dominique Doublet6, Louis Bernard7, Hubert Bugel8, Sophie Conquy9, Albert Sotto10, Jean Paul Boiteux11, Bertrand Pogu12, Xavier Rebillard13, Pierre Mongiat-Artus5, Patrick Coloby14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate biopsy side effects have a role in the controversy over screening for prostate cancer. We measured the precise incidence of infection after prostate biopsy and determined risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study in France from April to June 2013. All prostate biopsies done during this period were included in study. A web based questionnaire was used to identify patient characteristics, biopsy methods and postoperative infectious episodes. External audit helped ensure data completeness. The primary outcome was the post-biopsy infection rate. We determined risk factors for infectious complications using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The study included 2,718 patients, of whom 6% reported receiving antibiotics in the previous 6 months and 7.4% had a history of prostatitis. Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis consisting of 2 fluoroquinolone tablets 2 hours before examination for prostate biopsy was noted in 78.3% of cases. Post-biopsy sepsis was found in 76 subjects (2.8%). On multivariate analysis predictors of post-biopsy sepsis were noncompliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.9, p = 0.001), antibiotic treatment in the previous 6 months (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.9, p = 0.015) and a history of prostatitis (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study the incidence of post-prostate biopsy sepsis was 2.8% and no deaths were reported. Risk factors identified on multivariate analysis were noncompliance with antibiotic prophylaxis according to guidelines, antibiotic treatment in the previous 6 months and a history of prostatitis.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; prostate; prostatitis; risk; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25063492     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

4.  Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Abdullah Demirtaş; Esma Eren; Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket Tolga Tombul; Emine Alp
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in the era of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance: prophylaxis with single-dose ertapenem.

Authors:  Michael Seitz; Christian Stief; Raphaela Waidelich; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Initial experience and cancer detection rates of office-based transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Zachary Kozel; Clay Martin; David Mikhail; Aaron Smith; Luke Griffiths; Daniel Nethala; Manish Vira; Michael Schwartz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.052

8.  Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005-2013: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  K Lahdensuo; A Rannikko; V-J Anttila; A Erickson; A Pätäri-Sampo; M Rautio; H Santti; E Tarkka; M Vaara; K Huotari
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  A molecular signature of PCA3 and ERG exosomal RNA from non-DRE urine is predictive of initial prostate biopsy result.

Authors:  M J Donovan; M Noerholm; S Bentink; S Belzer; J Skog; V O'Neill; J S Cochran; G A Brown
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Strategies for prevention of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy infections.

Authors:  Diane D Lu; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.