| Literature DB >> 25062953 |
Jeroen J Bax1, Victoria Delgado2, Vinayak Bapat3, Helmut Baumgartner4, Jean P Collet5, Raimund Erbel6, Christian Hamm7, Arie P Kappetein8, Jonathon Leipsic9, Martin B Leon10, Philip MacCarthy11, Nicolo Piazza12, Philippe Pibarot13, William C Roberts14, Josep Rodés-Cabau15, Patrick W Serruys8, Martyn Thomas3, Alec Vahanian16, John Webb9, Jose Luis Zamorano17, Stephan Windecker18.
Abstract
This article provides an overview on procedure-related issues and uncertainties in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The different access sites and how to select them in an individual patient are discussed. Also, the occurrence and potential predictors of aortic regurgitation (AR) after TAVI are addressed. The different methods to quantify AR are reviewed, and it appears that accurate and reproducible quantification is suboptimal. Complications such as prosthesis-patient mismatch and conduction abnormalities (and need for permanent pacemaker) are discussed, as well as cerebrovascular events, which emphasize the development of optimal anti-coagulative strategies. Finally, recent registries have shown the adoption of TAVI in the real world, but longer follow-up studies are needed to evaluate the outcome (but also prosthesis durability). Additionally, future studies are briefly discussed, which will address the use of TAVI in pure AR and lower-risk patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: Access site; Aortic regurgitation; Complications; Registries; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25062953 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J ISSN: 0195-668X Impact factor: 29.983