Literature DB >> 25060038

The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework.

Michelle A Meade1, Elham Mahmoudi, Shoou-Yih Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article provides a conceptual framework for understanding healthcare disparities experienced by individuals with disabilities. While health disparities are the result of factors deeply rooted in culture, life style, socioeconomic status, and accessibility of resources, healthcare disparities are a subset of health disparities that reflect differences in access to and quality of healthcare and can be viewed as the inability of the healthcare system to adequately address the needs of specific population groups.
METHODS: This article uses a narrative method to identify and critique the main conceptual frameworks that have been used in analyzing disparities in healthcare access and quality, and evaluating those frameworks in the context of healthcare for individuals with disabilities. Specific models that are examined include the Aday and Anderson Model, the Grossman Utility Model, the Institute of Medicine (IOM)'s models of Access to Healthcare Services and Healthcare Disparities, and the Cultural Competency model.
RESULTS: While existing frameworks advance understandings of disparities in healthcare access and quality, they fall short when applied to individuals with disabilities. Specific deficits include a lack of attention to cultural and contextual factors (Aday and Andersen framework), unrealistic assumptions regarding equal access to resources (Grossman's utility model), lack of recognition or inclusion of concepts of structural accessibility (IOM model of Healthcare Disparities) and exclusive emphasis on supply side of the healthcare equation to improve healthcare disparities (Cultural Competency model). In response to identified gaps in the literature and short-comings of current conceptualizations, an integrated model of disability and healthcare disparities is put forth.
CONCLUSION: We analyzed models of access to care and disparities in healthcare to be able to have an integrated and cohesive conceptual framework that could potentially address issues related to access to healthcare among individuals with disabilities. The Model of Healthcare Disparities and Disability (MHDD) provides a framework for conceptualizing how healthcare disparities impact disability and specifically, how a mismatch between personal and environmental factors may result in reduced healthcare access and quality, which in turn may lead to reduced functioning, activity and participation among individuals with impairments and chronic health conditions. Researchers, health providers, policy makers and community advocate groups who are engaged in devising interventions aimed at reducing healthcare disparities would benefit from the discussions. Implications for Rehabilitation Evaluates the main models of healthcare disparity and disability to create an integrated framework. Provides a comprehensive conceptual model of healthcare disparity that specifically targets issues related to individuals with disabilities. Conceptualizes how personal and environmental factors interact to produce disparities in access to healthcare and healthcare quality. Recognizes and targets modifiable factors to reduce disparities between and within individuals with disabilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access to care; disability; healthcare access; healthcare disparities; healthcare quality; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25060038     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.938176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  24 in total

1.  Age-related trends in cardiometabolic disease among adults with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Neil Kamdar; Edward A Hurvitz
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.449

2.  High prevalence of disability and HIV risk among low socioeconomic status urban adults, 17 U.S. cities.

Authors:  Katherine E Doyle; Catlainn Sionean; Gabriela Paz-Bailey; NaTasha D Hollis; Dafna Kanny; Cyprian Wejnert
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.554

3.  Electronic device use by individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Gillian Mayman; Marisa Perera; Michelle A Meade; Joanna Jennie; Eric Maslowski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Creative Approaches to the Inclusion of Medical Students With Disabilities.

Authors:  Lisa M Meeks; Peter Poullos; Bonnielin K Swenor
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 5.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Differences in continence rates in individuals with spina bifida based on ethnicity.

Authors:  Kathryn A Smith; Tiebin Liu; Kurt A Freeman; Cecily Betz; Gerald H Clayton; Heidi Castillo; Jonathan Castillo; Duong Tu; Alexander Van Speybroeck; William O Walker
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2019

7.  US Physicians' Knowledge About The Americans With Disabilities Act And Accommodation Of Patients With Disability.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Sowmya R Rao; Julie Ressalam; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Nicole D Agaronnik; Tara Lagu; Elizabeth Pendo; Eric G Campbell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Ableism and Contours of the Attitudinal Environment as Identified by Adults with Long-Term Physical Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lisa Reber; Jodi M Kreschmer; Tyler G James; Jaime D Junior; Gina L DeShong; Shan Parker; Michelle A Meade
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Development and Feasibility of Health Mechanics: A Self-Management Program for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Michelle A Meade; Brad Trumpower; Martin Forchheimer; Lisa DiPonio
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2016

10.  Disparity in rehabilitation: another inconvenient truth.

Authors:  Kenneth M Jaffe; Nathalia Jimenez
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.