Literature DB >> 25059435

The behavior of lipid debris left on cell surfaces from microbubble based ultrasound molecular imaging.

Stuart Ibsen1, Guixin Shi2, Carolyn Schutt3, Linda Shi3, Kyle-David Suico3, Michael Benchimol2, Viviana Serra3, Dmitri Simberg2, Michael Berns3, Sadik Esener4.   

Abstract

Lipid monolayer coated microbubbles are currently being developed to identify vascular regions that express certain surface proteins as part of the new technique of ultrasound molecular imaging. The microbubbles are functionalized with targeting ligands which bind to the desired cells holding the microbubbles in place as the remaining unbound microbubbles are eliminated from circulation. Subsequent scanning with ultrasound can detect the highly reflectant microbubbles that are left behind. The ultrasound scanning and detection process results in the destruction of the microbubble, creating lipid fragments from the monolayer. Here we demonstrate that microbubbles targeted to 4T1 murine breast cancer cells and human umbilical cord endothelial cells leave behind adhered fragments of the lipid monolayer after exposure to ultrasound with peak negative pressures of 0.18 and 0.8MPa. Most of the observed fragments were large enough to be resistant to receptor mediated endocytosis. The fragments were not observed to incorporate into the lipid membrane of the cell over a period of 96min. They were not observed to break into smaller pieces or significantly change shape but they were observed to undergo translation and rotation across the cell surface as the cells migrated over the substrate. These large fragments will apparently remain on the surface of the targeted cells for significant periods of time and need to be considered for their potential effects on blood flow through the microcapillaries and potential for immune system recognition.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lipid debris; Microbubble; Microbubble targeting; Ultrasound molecular imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059435      PMCID: PMC4151124          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  35 in total

1.  Internet-based robotic laser scissors and tweezers microscopy.

Authors:  Elliot L Botvinick; Michael W Berns
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High-speed photography during ultrasound illustrates potential therapeutic applications of microbubbles.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Annemieke van Wamel; Folkert J ten Cate; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Fluorescent microscope system to monitor real-time interactions between focused ultrasound, echogenic drug delivery vehicles, and live cell membranes.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Michael Benchimol; Sadik Esener
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Hypersensitivity and loss of disease site targeting caused by antibody responses to PEGylated liposomes.

Authors:  Adam Judge; Kevin McClintock; Janet R Phelps; Ian Maclachlan
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Effect of particle size of nanospheres and microspheres on the cellular-association and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in 4T1 cells.

Authors:  Sinjan De; Donald W Miller; Dennis H Robinson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Amphipathic polyethyleneglycols effectively prolong the circulation time of liposomes.

Authors:  A L Klibanov; K Maruyama; V P Torchilin; L Huang
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1990-07-30       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Tumor delivery of ultrasound contrast agents using Shiga toxin B subunit.

Authors:  Olivier Couture; Estelle Dransart; Sabrina Dehay; Fariba Nemati; Didier Decaudin; Ludger Johannes; Mickael Tanter
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.488

9.  Targeted microbubbles for imaging tumor angiogenesis: assessment of whole-body biodistribution with dynamic micro-PET in mice.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Zhen Cheng; Corrine Davis; Amelie M Lutz; Meike L Schipper; Carsten H Nielsen; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  In vivo optical imaging of integrin alphaV-beta3 in mice using multivalent or monovalent cRGD targeting vectors.

Authors:  Zhao-Hui Jin; Véronique Josserand; Stéphanie Foillard; Didier Boturyn; Pascal Dumy; Marie-Christine Favrot; Jean-Luc Coll
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 27.401

View more
  4 in total

1.  The influence of distance between microbubbles on the fluid flow produced during ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schutt; Stuart D Ibsen; William Thrift; Sadik C Esener
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Removal of ligand-bound liposomes from cell surfaces by microbubbles exposed to ultrasound.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Ruben Mora; Guixin Shi; Carolyn Schutt; Wenjin Cui; Michael Benchimol; Viviana Serra; Sadik Esener
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Sonoporation Using Nanoparticle-Loaded Microbubbles Increases Cellular Uptake of Nanoparticles Compared to Co-Incubation of Nanoparticles and Microbubbles.

Authors:  Sofie Snipstad; Sigurd Hanstad; Astrid Bjørkøy; Ýrr Mørch; Catharina de Lange Davies
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  In Vivo Toxicity Study of Engineered Lipid Microbubbles in Rodents.

Authors:  Gaio Paradossi; Letizia Oddo; Barbara Cerroni; Carmit Ben-Harush; Eti Ariel; Francesco Di Meco; Zvi Ram; Rachel Grossman
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-03-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.