Literature DB >> 22749476

Fluorescent microscope system to monitor real-time interactions between focused ultrasound, echogenic drug delivery vehicles, and live cell membranes.

Stuart Ibsen1, Michael Benchimol, Sadik Esener.   

Abstract

Rapid development in the field of ultrasound triggered drug delivery has made it essential to study the real-time interaction between the membranes of live cells and the membranes of echogenic delivery vehicles under exposure to focused ultrasound. The objective of this work was to design an analysis system that combined fluorescent imagining, high speed videography, and definable pulse sequences of focused ultrasound to allow for real time observations of both cell and vehicle membranes. Documenting the behavior of the membranes themselves has not previously been possible due to limitations with existing optical systems used to understand the basic physics of microbubble/ultrasound interaction and the basic interaction between microbubbles and cells. The performance of this new system to monitor membrane behavior was demonstrated by documenting the modes of vehicle fragmentation at different ultrasound intensity levels. At 1.5MPa the membranes were shown to completely fragment while at intensities below 1MPa the membranes pop open and slowly unfold. The interaction between these vehicles and cell membranes was also documented by the removal of fluorescent particles from the surfaces of live cells out to 20μm from the microbubble location. The fluid flow created by microstreaming around ensonated microbubbles was documented at video recording speeds from 60 to 18,000 frames per second. This information about membrane behavior allows the chemical and physical properties of the drug delivery vehicle to be designed along with the ultrasound pulse sequence to cause the most efficient drug delivery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749476      PMCID: PMC3484231          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  21 in total

1.  Sonoporation of monolayer cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast-agent gas bodies.

Authors:  D L Miller; J Quddus
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils.

Authors:  P A Dayton; J E Chomas; A F Lum; J S Allen; J R Lindner; S I Simon; K W Ferrara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation.

Authors:  Joel P Ross; Xiane Cai; Jen-Fu Chiu; J Yang; Junru Wu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; D May; K Ferrara
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; John S Allen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles.

Authors:  Philippe Marmottant; Sascha Hilgenfeldt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Effective gene delivery with novel liposomal bubbles and ultrasonic destruction technology.

Authors:  Ryo Suzuki; Tomoko Takizawa; Yoichi Negishi; Naoki Utoguchi; Kazuo Maruyama
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 8.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  M W Miller; D L Miller; A A Brayman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustically active liposomes for drug encapsulation and ultrasound-triggered release.

Authors:  Shao-Ling Huang; Robert C MacDonald
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-10-11

10.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro.

Authors:  D L Miller; R M Thomas
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of distance between microbubbles on the fluid flow produced during ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schutt; Stuart D Ibsen; William Thrift; Sadik C Esener
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Removal of ligand-bound liposomes from cell surfaces by microbubbles exposed to ultrasound.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Ruben Mora; Guixin Shi; Carolyn Schutt; Wenjin Cui; Michael Benchimol; Viviana Serra; Sadik Esener
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Use of Theranostic Strategies in Myocardial Cavitation-Enabled Therapy.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Chunyan Dou; Xiaofang Lu; Yiying I Zhu; Mario L Fabiilli; Gabe E Owens; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  The behavior of lipid debris left on cell surfaces from microbubble based ultrasound molecular imaging.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Guixin Shi; Carolyn Schutt; Linda Shi; Kyle-David Suico; Michael Benchimol; Viviana Serra; Dmitri Simberg; Michael Berns; Sadik Esener
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Sonogenetics is a non-invasive approach to activating neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Ada Tong; Carolyn Schutt; Sadik Esener; Sreekanth H Chalasani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Ultrasound Microbubble Treatment Enhances Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis and Fluid-Phase Uptake through Distinct Mechanisms.

Authors:  Farnaz Fekri; Ralph Christian Delos Santos; Raffi Karshafian; Costin N Antonescu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.