BACKGROUND: Recent conflicting reports have found both brain tumor hypercellularity and necrosis in regions of restricted diffusion on MRI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. This study precisely compares ADC and cell density voxel by voxel using postmortem human whole brain samples. METHODS: Patients with meningioma were evaluated to determine a normative ADC distribution within benign fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2/hyperintensity surrounding tumor. This distribution was used to calculate a minimum ADC threshold to define regions of ADC-FLAIR mismatch (AFMM), where restricted diffusion presented in conjunction with T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Contrast-enhancing voxels were excluded from this analysis. AFMM maps were generated using imaging acquired prior to death in 7 patients with high-grade glioma who eventually donated their brains upon death. Histological samples were taken from numerous regions of abnormal FLAIR and AFMM. Each sample was computationally processed to determine cell density. Custom software was then used to downsample coregistered microscopic histology to the more coarse MRI resolution. A voxel-by-voxel evaluation comparing ADC and cellularity was then performed. RESULTS: An ADC threshold of 0.929 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was calculated from meningioma-induced edema and was used to define AFMM. Regions of AFMM showed significantly greater cell density in 6 of 7 high-grade glioma cases compared with regions of hyperintense FLAIR alone (P < .0001). Two patients had small regions of diffusion-restricted necrosis that had significantly lower ADC than nearby hypercellularity. CONCLUSIONS: Regions of AFMM contain hypercellularity except for regions with extremely restricted diffusion, where necrosis is present.
BACKGROUND: Recent conflicting reports have found both brain tumor hypercellularity and necrosis in regions of restricted diffusion on MRI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. This study precisely compares ADC and cell density voxel by voxel using postmortem human whole brain samples. METHODS:Patients with meningioma were evaluated to determine a normative ADC distribution within benign fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T2/hyperintensity surrounding tumor. This distribution was used to calculate a minimum ADC threshold to define regions of ADC-FLAIR mismatch (AFMM), where restricted diffusion presented in conjunction with T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Contrast-enhancing voxels were excluded from this analysis. AFMM maps were generated using imaging acquired prior to death in 7 patients with high-grade glioma who eventually donated their brains upon death. Histological samples were taken from numerous regions of abnormal FLAIR and AFMM. Each sample was computationally processed to determine cell density. Custom software was then used to downsample coregistered microscopic histology to the more coarse MRI resolution. A voxel-by-voxel evaluation comparing ADC and cellularity was then performed. RESULTS: An ADC threshold of 0.929 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s was calculated from meningioma-induced edema and was used to define AFMM. Regions of AFMM showed significantly greater cell density in 6 of 7 high-grade glioma cases compared with regions of hyperintense FLAIR alone (P < .0001). Two patients had small regions of diffusion-restricted necrosis that had significantly lower ADC than nearby hypercellularity. CONCLUSIONS: Regions of AFMM contain hypercellularity except for regions with extremely restricted diffusion, where necrosis is present.
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K M Gauvain; R C McKinstry; P Mukherjee; A Perry; J J Neil; B A Kaufman; R J Hayashi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: A Gupta; R J Young; A I Holodny; A B Lassman; S Karimi; S Sood; Z Zhang; Q Mo; P H Gutin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L E Gaspar; B J Fisher; D R Macdonald; D V LeBer; E C Halperin; S C Schold; J G Cairncross Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nikdokht Farid; Daniela B Almeida-Freitas; Nathan S White; Carrie R McDonald; Karra A Muller; Scott R Vandenberg; Santosh Kesari; Anders M Dale Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: H S Nguyen; N Milbach; S L Hurrell; E Cochran; J Connelly; J A Bovi; C J Schultz; W M Mueller; S D Rand; K M Schmainda; P S LaViolette Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lei Qin; Xiang Li; Amanda Stroiney; Jinrong Qu; Jeffrey Helgager; David A Reardon; Geoffrey S Young Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Bruna V Jardim-Perassi; Suning Huang; William Dominguez-Viqueira; Jan Poleszczuk; Mikalai M Budzevich; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Smitha R Pillai; Epifanio Ruiz; Marilyn M Bui; Debora A P C Zuccari; Robert J Gillies; Gary V Martinez Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L S Hu; H Yoon; J M Eschbacher; L C Baxter; A C Dueck; A Nespodzany; K A Smith; P Nakaji; Y Xu; L Wang; J P Karis; A J Hawkins-Daarud; K W Singleton; P R Jackson; B J Anderies; B R Bendok; R S Zimmerman; C Quarles; A B Porter-Umphrey; M M Mrugala; A Sharma; J M Hoxworth; M G Sattur; N Sanai; P E Koulemberis; C Krishna; J R Mitchell; T Wu; N L Tran; K R Swanson; J Li Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R Ceschin; B F Kurland; S R Abberbock; B M Ellingson; H Okada; R I Jakacki; I F Pollack; A Panigrahy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825