Daniel R Moore1, Tyler A Churchward-Venne2, Oliver Witard3, Leigh Breen4, Nicholas A Burd5, Kevin D Tipton3, Stuart M Phillips6. 1. Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Sport and Exercise Science, University of Stirling, UK. 4. Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Birmingham University, UK. 5. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. 6. Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. phillis@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adequate protein ingestion-mediated stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) is required to maintain skeletal muscle mass. It is currently unknown what per meal protein intake is required to maximally stimulate the response in older men and whether it differs from that of younger men. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from our laboratories that measured MPS in healthy older (~71 years) and younger (~22 years) men by primed constant infusion of l-ring-[(13)C6]phenylalanine after ingestion of varying amounts (0-40 g) of high-quality dietary protein as a single bolus and normalized to body mass and, where available, lean body mass (LBM). RESULTS: There was no difference (p = .53) in basal MPS rates between older (0.027±0.04%/h; means ± 95% CI) and young (0.028 ± 0.03%/h) men. Biphase linear regression and breakpoint analysis revealed the slope of first line segment was lower (p < .05) in older men and that MPS reached a plateau after ingestion of 0.40 ± 0.19 and 0.24 ± 0.06 g/kg body mass (p = .055) and 0.60 ± 0.29 and 0.25 ± 0.13 g/kg lean body mass (p < .01) in older and younger men, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of the relative (to body weight) protein ingested dose response of MPS in younger and older men. Our data suggest that healthy older men are less sensitive to low protein intakes and require a greater relative protein intake, in a single meal, than young men to maximally stimulate postprandial rates of MPS. These results should be considered when developing nutritional solutions to maximize MPS for the maintenance or enhancement of muscle mass with advancing age.
BACKGROUND: Adequate protein ingestion-mediated stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS) is required to maintain skeletal muscle mass. It is currently unknown what per meal protein intake is required to maximally stimulate the response in older men and whether it differs from that of younger men. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from our laboratories that measured MPS in healthy older (~71 years) and younger (~22 years) men by primed constant infusion of l-ring-[(13)C6]phenylalanine after ingestion of varying amounts (0-40 g) of high-quality dietary protein as a single bolus and normalized to body mass and, where available, lean body mass (LBM). RESULTS: There was no difference (p = .53) in basal MPS rates between older (0.027±0.04%/h; means ± 95% CI) and young (0.028 ± 0.03%/h) men. Biphase linear regression and breakpoint analysis revealed the slope of first line segment was lower (p < .05) in older men and that MPS reached a plateau after ingestion of 0.40 ± 0.19 and 0.24 ± 0.06 g/kg body mass (p = .055) and 0.60 ± 0.29 and 0.25 ± 0.13 g/kg lean body mass (p < .01) in older and younger men, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of the relative (to body weight) protein ingested dose response of MPS in younger and older men. Our data suggest that healthy older men are less sensitive to low protein intakes and require a greater relative protein intake, in a single meal, than young men to maximally stimulate postprandial rates of MPS. These results should be considered when developing nutritional solutions to maximize MPS for the maintenance or enhancement of muscle mass with advancing age.
Authors: Caoileann H Murphy; Ellen M Flanagan; Giuseppe De Vito; Davide Susta; Kathleen A J Mitchelson; Elena de Marco Castro; Joan M G Senden; Joy P B Goessens; Agnieszka Mikłosz; Adrian Chabowski; Ricardo Segurado; Clare A Corish; Sinead N McCarthy; Brendan Egan; Luc J C van Loon; Helen M Roche Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Tatiana Moro; Camille R Brightwell; Rachel R Deer; Ted G Graber; Elfego Galvan; Christopher S Fry; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Caoileann H Murphy; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Cameron J Mitchell; Nathan M Kolar; Amira Kassis; Leonidas G Karagounis; Louise M Burke; John A Hawley; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Melissa M Markofski; Kristofer Jennings; Kyle L Timmerman; Jared M Dickinson; Christopher S Fry; Michael S Borack; Paul T Reidy; Rachel R Deer; Amanda Randolph; Blake B Rasmussen; Elena Volpi Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 6.053