Literature DB >> 25056230

Implementation of a competency check-off in diagnostic fluoroscopy for radiology trainees: impact on reducing radiation for three common fluoroscopic exams in children.

Sweta Shah1, Stephane L Desouches, Lisa H Lowe, Nima Kasraie, Brenton Reading.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopy is an important tool for diagnosis in the pediatric population, but it carries the risk of radiation exposure. Because radiology resident education and experience in the use of fluoroscopy equipment in children vary, we implemented an intervention to standardize fluoroscopy training.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of implementing a fluoroscopy competency check-off for radiology resident trainees aimed at decreasing radiation exposure in three common pediatric fluoroscopic studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fluoroscopy competency check-off form was developed for radiology resident trainees performing pediatric procedures. Techniques used to limit radiation exposure for common pediatric radiologic studies were reviewed as part of the check-off process. Pediatric radiologists supervised each trainee until they demonstrated competence to independently perform three specified procedures. Radiation dose was recorded for the three procedures, upper GI (UGI), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and oropharyngeal (OPM) exams, over 6 months preceding and 6 months following implementation of the competency check-off. The mean cumulative dose for each procedure was compared before and after implementation of competency check-off using a Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: During the 12-month study period doses from 909 fluoroscopic procedures were recorded. In the 6 months preceding competency check-off implementation, procedures were performed by 24 radiology resident trainees including 171 UGI, 176 VCUG and 171 OPM exams. In the 6 months following competency check-off, 23 trainees performed 114 UGI, 145 VCUG and 132 OPM exams. After competency check-off implementation, a statistically significant reduction in average radiation dose was found for all three studies (P < 0.001). Median cumulative doses (mGy) were decreased by 33%, 36% and 13% for UGIs, VCUGs and OPMs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of a competency check-off for radiology resident trainees can reduce average radiation doses in pediatric patients undergoing three common fluoroscopic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056230     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  29 in total

1.  Influence of radiologist grade on fluoroscopic patient dose.

Authors:  P R Hoskins; J R Williams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection.

Authors:  James A Brink; E Stephen Amis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Penny F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-01-17

5.  Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists.

Authors:  Baogang J Xu; Richard Duszak; Robert S McGinnis; John G Stanfill; Jeff O'Rear; Angel Q An
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Relationship between radiologist training level and fluoroscopy time for voiding cystourethrography.

Authors:  Ruth Lim; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Katherine Nimkin; Pallavi Sagar; Randheer Shailam; Michael S Gee; Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Entrustment and mapping of observable practice activities for resident assessment.

Authors:  Eric J Warm; Bradley R Mathis; Justin D Held; Savita Pai; Jonathan Tolentino; Lauren Ashbrook; Cheryl K Lee; David Lee; Sharice Wood; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Daniel Schauer; Ryan Munyon; Caroline Mueller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel.

Authors:  L Brateman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrogram.

Authors:  Seema Agrawalla; Rowena Pearce; T Robin Goodman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-10-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Underestimation of fluoroscopic exposure among orthopedic residents.

Authors:  Kelly D Carmichael; Lattisha L Bilbrew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Radiology Trainee vs Faculty Radiologist Fluoroscopy Time for Imaging-Guided Procedures: A Retrospective Study of 17,966 Reports Over a 5.5-Year Period.

Authors:  Ariadne K DeSimone; Andrew Post; Richard Duszak; Phuong-Anh T Duong
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2017-07-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.