Literature DB >> 25056207

'You shall not pass!': quantifying barrier permeability and proximity avoidance by animals.

Hawthorne L Beyer1, Eliezer Gurarie2,3, Luca Börger4, Manuela Panzacchi5, Mathieu Basille6, Ivar Herfindal7, Bram Van Moorter5, Subhash R Lele8, Jason Matthiopoulos9.   

Abstract

Impediments to animal movement are ubiquitous and vary widely in both scale and permeability. It is essential to understand how impediments alter ecological dynamics via their influence on animal behavioural strategies governing space use and, for anthropogenic features such as roads and fences, how to mitigate these effects to effectively manage species and landscapes. Here, we focused primarily on barriers to movement, which we define as features that cannot be circumnavigated but may be crossed. Responses to barriers will be influenced by the movement capabilities of the animal, its proximity to the barriers, and habitat preference. We developed a mechanistic modelling framework for simultaneously quantifying the permeability and proximity effects of barriers on habitat preference and movement. We used simulations based on our model to demonstrate how parameters on movement, habitat preference and barrier permeability can be estimated statistically. We then applied the model to a case study of road effects on wild mountain reindeer summer movements. This framework provided unbiased and precise parameter estimates across a range of strengths of preferences and barrier permeabilities. The quality of permeability estimates, however, was correlated with the number of times the barrier is crossed and the number of locations in proximity to barriers. In the case study we found that reindeer avoided areas near roads and that roads are semi-permeable barriers to movement. There was strong avoidance of roads extending up to c. 1 km for four of five animals, and having to cross roads reduced the probability of movement by 68·6% (range 3·5-99·5%). Human infrastructure has embedded within it the idea of networks: nodes connected by linear features such as roads, rail tracks, pipelines, fences and cables, many of which divide the landscape and limit animal movement. The unintended but potentially profound consequences of infrastructure on animals remain poorly understood. The rigorous framework for simultaneously quantifying movement, habitat preference and barrier permeability developed here begins to address this knowledge gap.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rangifer tarandus; animal movement; connectivity; fences; movement ecology; reindeer; resistance; resource selection; roads; step selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25056207     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  11 in total

Review 1.  Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

Authors:  Endre Grüner Ofstad; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Alignment with neighbours enables escape from dead ends in flocking models.

Authors:  Varun Joshi; Stefan Popp; Justin Werfel; Helen F McCreery
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Reindeer habitat use in relation to two small wind farms, during preconstruction, construction, and operation.

Authors:  Anna Skarin; Moudud Alam
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Complex variation in habitat selection strategies among individuals driven by extrinsic factors.

Authors:  Edward J Raynor; Hawthorne L Beyer; John M Briggs; Anthony Joern
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  SiMRiv: an R package for mechanistic simulation of individual, spatially-explicit multistate movements in rivers, heterogeneous and homogeneous spaces incorporating landscape bias.

Authors:  Lorenzo Quaglietta; Miguel Porto
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Modified home range kernel density estimators that take environmental interactions into account.

Authors:  Guillaume Péron
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Possible causes of divergent population trends in sympatric African herbivores.

Authors:  Emily Bennitt; Tatjana Y Hubel; Hattie L A Bartlam-Brooks; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Forging a Bayesian link between habitat selection and avoidance behavior in a grassland grouse.

Authors:  Michael A Patten; Alexandra A Barnard; Claire M Curry; Henry Dang; Rebecca W Loraamm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Malayan kraits (Bungarus candidus) show affinity to anthropogenic structures in a human dominated landscape.

Authors:  Cameron Wesley Hodges; Benjamin Michael Marshall; Jacques George Hill; Colin Thomas Strine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Mapping potential effects of proposed roads on migratory connectivity for a highly mobile herbivore using circuit theory.

Authors:  Timothy J Fullman; Ryan R Wilson; Kyle Joly; David D Gustine; Paul Leonard; Wendy M Loya
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.