Literature DB >> 25054567

Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic review of the literature.

Ioannis G Papanikolaou1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical practice has been changed since the introduction of robotic techniques and robotic colorectal surgery is an emerging field. Innovative robotic technologies have helped surgeons overcome many technical difficulties of conventional laparoscopic surgery. Herein, we review the clinical studies regarding the application of surgical robots in resections for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for articles published up to September 9, 2012, using the MEDLINE database. The keywords that were used in various combinations were: "surgical robotics," "robotic surgery," "computer-assisted surgery," "colectomy," "sigmoid resection," "sigmoidectomy," and "rectal resection."
RESULTS: Fifty-nine articles reporting on robot-assisted resections of colon and/or rectum were identified and 41 studies were finally included in the analysis. A total of 1635 colorectal procedures were performed: 254 right colectomies, 185 left colectomies/sigmoid resections, 969 anterior resections, 182 abdominoperineal or intersphincteric resections, 34 colectomies (without being specified as right or left), and 11 total/subtotal colectomies. In general, blood loss, conversion rates, and complications were low but the operative time was longer than the open procedures, whereas the duration of hospitalization was shorter. The number of harvested lymph nodes was also quite satisfactory.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic colorectal operations provide favorable results, with acceptable operative times and low conversion rates and morbidity. Surgical robots may provide additional benefits treating challenging pathologies, such as rectal cancer. Further clinical studies and long-term follow-up are required to better evaluate the outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25054567     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  14 in total

1.  Robot-assisted surgery for the radical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with colorectal involvement: short- and mid-term surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Alessandra Perutelli; Matteo Palmeri; Simone Guadagni; Maria Donatella Mariniello; Gregorio Di Franco; Vito Cela; Benedetta Brundu; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Minimally invasive surgery and robotic surgery: surgery 4.0?].

Authors:  H Feußner; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.

Authors:  Walaa F Abdelmoaty; Christy M Dunst; Chris Neighorn; Lee L Swanstrom; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Vincent Obias; Kathleen B Welch; James F Vandewarker; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Alyssa K Kosturakis; Kathryn E LaRusso; Nels D Carroll; Michael B Nicholl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

Review 7.  Robotic technology for colorectal surgery : Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges.

Authors:  G Spinoglio; P Bellora; M Monni
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  [Robotic technology for colorectal surgery : Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges - German version].

Authors:  G Spinoglio; P Bellora; M Monni
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.

Authors:  Rogier M P H Crolla; Paul G Mulder; George P van der Schelling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Kimberly E Waite; Mark A Herman; Patrick J Doyle
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.