Literature DB >> 26801753

[Minimally invasive surgery and robotic surgery: surgery 4.0?].

H Feußner1, D Wilhelm2.   

Abstract

Surgery can only maintain its role in a highly competitive environment if results are continuously improved, accompanied by further reduction of the interventional trauma for patients and with justifiable costs. Significant impulse to achieve this goal was expected from minimally invasive surgery and, in particular, robotic surgery; however, a real breakthrough has not yet been achieved. Accordingly, the new strategic approach of cognitive surgery is required to optimize the provision of surgical treatment. A full scale integration of all modules utilized in the operating room (OR) into a comprehensive network and the development of systems with technical cognition are needed to upgrade the current technical environment passively controlled by the surgeon into an active collaborative support system (surgery 4.0). Only then can the true potential of minimally invasive surgery and robotic surgery be exploited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Surgery 4.0; Technique

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26801753     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0145-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  22 in total

1.  Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Benedikt Pletzer; Arthur Heiligensetzer; Petra Wolf; Jörg Kleeff; Hubertus Feussner; Alois Fürst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Mikael H Sodergren; Amy C Lord; Julian Teare; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database.

Authors:  Muhammad Salman; Theodore Bell; Jennifer Martin; Kalpesh Bhuva; Rod Grim; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder.

Authors:  Sebastian W Holländer; Hans Joachim Klingen; Marliese Fritz; Peter Djalali; Dieter Birk
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2014-11

5.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Influence of a robotic camera holder on postoperative pain in women undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Tuschy; Sebastian Berlit; Stefanie Lis; Marc Sütterlin; Amadeus Hornemann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  S E Araujo; B Crawshaw; C R Mendes; C P Delaney
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  S Trastulli; R Cirocchi; C Listorti; D Cavaliere; N Avenia; N Gullà; G Giustozzi; F Sciannameo; G Noya; C Boselli
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongzhi Yang; Feng Wang; Peng Zhang; Chenzhang Shi; Yang Zou; Huanlong Qin; Yanlei Ma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Robotics and augmented reality : Current state of development and future perspectives].

Authors:  H Feußner; D Ostler; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sakshi Bramhe; Swanand S Pathak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15

3.  [Digitalization in surgery : What surgeons currently think and know about it-results of an online survey].

Authors:  D Wilhelm; M Kranzfelder; D Ostler; A Stier; H J Meyer; H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Surgery 4.0: the natural culmination of the industrial revolution?

Authors:  Hubertus Feußner; Adrian Park
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-08-28

5.  The next step: intelligent digital assistance for clinical operating rooms.

Authors:  Juliana Miehle; Daniel Ostler; Nadine Gerstenlauer; Wolfgang Minker
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-08-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.