Literature DB >> 25054343

Comparative potential of juvenile and adult human articular chondrocytes for cartilage tissue formation in three-dimensional biomimetic hydrogels.

Piera Smeriglio1, Janice H Lai, Lakshmi Dhulipala, Anthony W Behn, Stuart B Goodman, Robert L Smith, William J Maloney, Fan Yang, Nidhi Bhutani.   

Abstract

Regeneration of human articular cartilage is inherently limited and extensive efforts have focused on engineering the cartilage tissue. Various cellular sources have been studied for cartilage tissue engineering including adult chondrocytes, and embryonic or adult stem cells. Juvenile chondrocytes (from donors below 13 years of age) have recently been reported to be a promising cell source for cartilage regeneration. Previous studies have compared the potential of adult and juvenile chondrocytes or adult and osteoarthritic (OA) chondrocytes. To comprehensively characterize the comparative potential of young, old, and diseased chondrocytes, here we examined cartilage formation by juvenile, adult, and OA chondrocytes in three-dimensional (3D) biomimetic hydrogels composed of poly(ethylene glycol) and chondroitin sulfate. All three human articular chondrocytes were encapsulated in the 3D biomimetic hydrogels and cultured for 3 or 6 weeks to allow maturation and extracellular matrix formation. Outcomes were analyzed using quantitative gene expression, immunofluorescence staining, biochemical assays, and mechanical testing. After 3 and 6 weeks, juvenile chondrocytes showed a greater upregulation of chondrogenic gene expression than adult chondrocytes, while OA chondrocytes showed a downregulation. Aggrecan and type II collagen deposition and glycosaminoglycan accumulation were high for juvenile and adult chondrocytes but not for OA chondrocytes. Similar trend was observed in the compressive moduli of the cartilage constructs generated by the three different chondrocytes. In conclusion, the juvenile, adult and OA chondrocytes showed differential responses in the 3D biomimetic hydrogels. The 3D culture model described here may also provide a useful tool to further study the molecular differences among chondrocytes from different stages, which can help elucidate the mechanisms for age-related decline in the intrinsic capacity for cartilage repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25054343     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the effect of matrices on cartilage repair? A systematic review.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Melissa K Hartley; Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effects of passage number and post-expansion aggregate culture on tissue engineered, self-assembled neocartilage.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Overcoming Challenges in Engineering Large, Scaffold-Free Neocartilage with Functional Properties.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Wendy E Brown; Thomas Keown; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Transcriptome-Wide Analyses of Human Neonatal Articular Cartilage and Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Cartilage Provide a New Molecular Target for Evaluating Engineered Cartilage.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Somoza; Diego Correa; Ivan Labat; Hal Sternberg; Megan E Forrest; Ahmad M Khalil; Michael D West; Paul Tesar; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Articular Cartilage Fragmentation Improves Chondrocyte Migration by Upregulating Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloprotease.

Authors:  Yunliang Lei; Jiabin Peng; Zhu Dai; Ying Liao; Quanhui Liu; Jian Li; Yonghui Jiang
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Early induction of a prechondrogenic population allows efficient generation of stable chondrocytes from human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Sarah E B Taylor; Piera Smeriglio; Janice Lai; William J Maloney; Fan Yang; Nidhi Bhutani
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A Comparison of Bone Marrow and Cord Blood Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cartilage Self-Assembly.

Authors:  Jamie L White; Naomi J Walker; Jerry C Hu; Dori L Borjesson; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Impact of guidance documents on translational large animal studies of cartilage repair.

Authors:  Christian G Pfeifer; Matthew B Fisher; James L Carey; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  The Effect of Neonatal, Juvenile, and Adult Donors on Rejuvenated Neocartilage Functional Properties.

Authors:  Ryan P Donahue; Rachel C Nordberg; Benjamin J Bielajew; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.080

10.  3D Hydrogel Scaffolds for Articular Chondrocyte Culture and Cartilage Generation.

Authors:  Piera Smeriglio; Janice H Lai; Fan Yang; Nidhi Bhutani
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.