Laura Yochum1, Rulla M Tamimi, Susan E Hankinson. 1. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 426 Arnold House, 716 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA, yoch0002@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between birth weight and early life body size with adult mammographic density in the peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January, 2014. English language articles that assessed adult mammographic density (MD) in relation to early life body size (≤18 years old), or birthweight were included. RESULTS: Nine studies reported results for early life body size and %MD. Both exposure and outcome were assessed at different ages using multiple methods. In premenopausal women, findings were inconsistent; two studies reported significant, inverse associations, one reported a non-significant, inverse association, and two observed no association. Reasons for these inconsistencies were not obvious. In postmenopausal women, four of five studies supported an inverse association. Two of three studies that adjusted for menopausal status found significant, inverse associations. Birthweight and %MD was evaluated in nine studies. No association was seen in premenopausal women and two of three studies reported positive associations in postmenopausal women. Three of four studies that adjusted for menopausal status found no association. DISCUSSION: Early life body size and birthweight appear unrelated to %MD in premenopausal women while an inverse association in postmenopausal women is more likely. Although based on limited data, birthweight and %MD appear positively associated in postmenopausal women. Given the small number of studies, the multiple methods of data collection and analysis, other methodologic issues, and lack of consistency in results, additional research is needed to clarify this complex association and develop a better understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between birth weight and early life body size with adult mammographic density in the peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through January, 2014. English language articles that assessed adult mammographic density (MD) in relation to early life body size (≤18 years old), or birthweight were included. RESULTS: Nine studies reported results for early life body size and %MD. Both exposure and outcome were assessed at different ages using multiple methods. In premenopausal women, findings were inconsistent; two studies reported significant, inverse associations, one reported a non-significant, inverse association, and two observed no association. Reasons for these inconsistencies were not obvious. In postmenopausal women, four of five studies supported an inverse association. Two of three studies that adjusted for menopausal status found significant, inverse associations. Birthweight and %MD was evaluated in nine studies. No association was seen in premenopausal women and two of three studies reported positive associations in postmenopausal women. Three of four studies that adjusted for menopausal status found no association. DISCUSSION: Early life body size and birthweight appear unrelated to %MD in premenopausal women while an inverse association in postmenopausal women is more likely. Although based on limited data, birthweight and %MD appear positively associated in postmenopausal women. Given the small number of studies, the multiple methods of data collection and analysis, other methodologic issues, and lack of consistency in results, additional research is needed to clarify this complex association and develop a better understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms.
Authors: Karin B Michels; Barbara A Cohn; Mandy Goldberg; Julie D Flom; Marcelle Dougan; Mary Beth Terry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mary Beth Terry; Barbara A Cohn; Mandy Goldberg; Julie D Flom; Ying Wei; Lauren C Houghton; Parisa Tehranifar; Jasmine A McDonald; Angeline Protacio; Piera Cirillo; Karin B Michels Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Yunan Han; Catherine S Berkey; Cheryl R Herman; Catherine M Appleton; Aliya Alimujiang; Graham A Colditz; Adetunji T Toriola Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-02-26
Authors: Jun Wang; Cheng Peng; Catherine Guranich; Yujing J Heng; Gabrielle M Baker; Christopher A Rubadue; Kimberly Glass; A Heather Eliassen; Rulla M Tamimi; Kornelia Polyak; Susan Hankinson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Parisa Tehranifar; Barbara A Cohn; Julie D Flom; Angeline Protacio; Piera Cirillo; L H Lumey; Karin B Michels; Mary Beth Terry Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Minouk J Schoemaker; Michael E Jones; Steven Allen; Jean Hoare; Alan Ashworth; Mitch Dowsett; Anthony J Swerdlow Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Minouk J Schoemaker; Hazel B Nichols; Lauren B Wright; Mark N Brook; Michael E Jones; Katie M O'Brien; Hans-Olov Adami; Laura Baglietto; Leslie Bernstein; Kimberly A Bertrand; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Yu Chen; Avonne E Connor; Laure Dossus; A Heather Eliassen; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Susan E Hankinson; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Victoria A Kirsh; Cari M Kitahara; Susanna C Larsson; Martha Linet; Huiyan Ma; Roger L Milne; Kotaro Ozasa; Julie R Palmer; Elio Riboli; Thomas E Rohan; Carlotta Sacerdote; Atsuko Sadakane; Malin Sund; Rulla M Tamimi; Antonia Trichopoulou; Giske Ursin; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Walter C Willett; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Dale P Sandler; Anthony J Swerdlow Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 7.316