Literature DB >> 25052866

Pharmacodynamic profile of commonly utilised parenteral therapies against meticillin-susceptible and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus collected from US hospitals.

Seth T Housman1, Christina A Sutherland1, David P Nicolau2.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a well-recognised pathogen with an evolving phenotypic profile often limiting conventional β-lactam use. In vitro potency and pharmacodynamic profile of commonly utilised agents against 1238 meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 1259 meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from clinical specimens at 42 hospitals were assessed. Non-duplicate, non-urine isolates were tested by broth microdilution against cefazolin, ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, daptomycin, linezolid, nafcillin, tigecycline and vancomycin. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic profiles from patients or volunteers to generate the probability of target attainment and determine the cumulative fraction of response (CFR), a modelling-based prediction tool of achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic endpoints, for commonly used regimens. Of isolates tested, 62 MSSA (5.0%) were ceftriaxone-non-susceptible and 4 (0.3%) and 2 (0.2%) MRSA were ceftaroline- and daptomycin-non-susceptible, respectively. Against MSSA, cefazolin 1000 mg q8h and nafcillin 2000 mg q4h produced CFRs ≥90%. For ceftriaxone, only 2000 mg q12h produced a CFR ≥90%. Against MSSA and MRSA, ceftaroline, daptomycin, linezolid and tigecycline provided CFRs ≥90%. Vancomycin produced similar CFRs against MSSA and MRSA. Vancomycin 1000 mg and 15 mg/kg q8h produced CFRs of 91% and 93%, respectively, whilst q12h doses were <90%. Against respiratory and blood isolates or ICU isolates, only vancomycin q8h produced desired CFRs, where the MIC90 was 2 μg/mL. These data suggest cefazolin and nafcillin produce high CFRs against MSSA, whilst ceftriaxone at common doses may no longer be suitable. Vancomycin q8h is needed to optimise CFRs. Ceftaroline, daptomycin, tigecycline and linezolid produced sufficiently high CFRs against MSSA and MRSA utilising approved regimens.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meticillin-resistant S. aureus; Meticillin-susceptible S. aureus; Pharmacodynamics; Susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25052866     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  11 in total

1.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Megaprosthetic Reconstructions: Drug and Dosing May Matter More than Duration.

Authors:  Isabelle S Byers; Nicholas A Turner; Nicole L Levine; Alexander L Lazarides; Daniel R Evans; Ivan Spasojevic; Ping Fan; Sin-Ho Jung; Junheng Gao; Julia D Visgauss; Brian E Brigman; William C Eward
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Wonhee So; Jared L Crandon; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Efficacious Cefazolin Prophylactic Dose for Morbidly Obese Women Undergoing Bariatric Surgery Based on Evidence from Subcutaneous Microdialysis and Populational Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Eduardo Celia Palma; Nelson Guardiola Meinhardt; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Isabela Heineck; Maria Isabel Fischer; BibianaVerlindo de Araújo; Teresa Dalla Costa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Prevalence of a Cefazolin Inoculum Effect Associated with blaZ Gene Types among Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Four Major Medical Centers in Chicago.

Authors:  Sheila K Wang; Annette Gilchrist; Anastasia Loukitcheva; Balbina J Plotkin; Ira M Sigar; Alan E Gross; J Nicholas O'Donnell; Natasha Pettit; Amy Buros; Tristan O'Driscoll; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Cindy Bethel; John Segreti; Angella Charnot-Katsikas; Kamaljit Singh; Marc H Scheetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A Comparison of Cefazolin Versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Tertiary Care VA Medical Center.

Authors:  Dustin R Carr; Usha Stiefel; Robert A Bonomo; Christopher J Burant; Sharanie V Sims
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.835

6.  Cefazolin potency against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a microbiologic assessment in support of a novel drug delivery system for skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  David P Nicolau; Barry N Silberg
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Anti-staphylococcal activity resulting from epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of amikacin inhale administered via the pulmonary drug delivery system.

Authors:  Islam M Ghazi; Mordechai Grupper; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.944

8.  Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Case Series.

Authors:  Rachel Amanda Lowe; Katie Elizabeth Barber; Jamie Leigh Wagner; Allison Miriam Bell-Harlan; Kayla Renay Stover
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

9.  Assessing the Surrogate Susceptibility of Oxacillin and Cefoxitin for Commonly Utilized Parenteral Agents against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Focus on Ceftriaxone Discordance between Predictive Susceptibility and in Vivo Exposures.

Authors:  Nayon Kang; Seth T Housman; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2015-07-30

10.  Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  Thaina Miranda da Costa; Gabriel Trova Cuba; Priscylla Guimarães Migueres Morgado; David P Nicolau; Simone Aranha Nouér; Kátia Regina Netto Dos Santos; Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.