Literature DB >> 25052246

Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes.

Frederick Wang1, Anne Warren Peled, Elisabeth Garwood, Allison Stover Fiscalini, Hani Sbitany, Robert D Foster, Michael Alvarado, Cheryl Ewing, E Shelley Hwang, Laura J Esserman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the breast and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) skin was developed to improve aesthetic outcomes for mastectomy. Over time, indications for TSSM broadened and our technique has evolved with a series of systematic improvements.
METHODS: We reviewed all cases of TSSM with immediate breast reconstruction performed from 2005 to 2012. Patient comorbidities, treatment characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcomes were obtained prospectively and through medical chart review. Locoregional recurrences, distant recurrences, and patient survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: During this 8-year period, 633 patients (981 cases) underwent TSSM with median follow-up time of 29 (interquartile range 14-54) months. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed with tissue expander placement (89 %), pedicle TRAM (5 %), free flap (5 %), permanent implant (0.3 %), or latissimus flap (0.2 %). The incidences of postoperative complications decreased significantly over time. In 2012, these were down to 3.5 % for superficial nipple necrosis, 1.0 % for complete nipple necrosis, 3.0 % for minor skin flap necrosis, 4.4 % for major skin flap necrosis, 13.3 % for infections requiring oral antibiotics, 9.9 % for infections requiring intravenous antibiotics, 3.4 % for infections requiring operative intervention, and 8.5 % for expander/implant. Overall 5-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were 3.0 % (locoregional) and 4.2 % (distant), and there were no recurrences in the NAC skin.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic changes in our technique of TSSM and immediate breast reconstruction have decreased postoperative complications over time. Oncologic outcomes of locoregional and distal recurrences remain similar to skin-sparing mastectomy techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25052246     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3915-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Nipple-Areola Complex After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Wu; Hee-Jeong Kim; Jong-Won Lee; Il-Yong Chung; Ji-Sun Kim; Sae-Byul Lee; Byung-Ho Son; Jin-Sup Eom; Sung-Bae Kim; Gyung-Yub Gong; Hak-Hee Kim; Sei-Hyun Ahn; BeomSeok Ko
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Accurate Prediction of Tissue Viability at Postoperative Day 7 Using Only Two Intraoperative Subsecond Near-Infrared Fluorescence Images.

Authors:  Hideyuki Wada; Christina R Vargas; Joseph Angelo; Beverly Faulkner-Jones; Marek A Paul; Olivia A Ho; Bernard T Lee; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Skin Flap Necrosis After Mastectomy With Reconstruction: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Cindy B Matsen; Babak Mehrara; Anne Eaton; Deborah Capko; Anastasia Berg; Michelle Stempel; Kimberly J Van Zee; Andrea Pusic; Tari A King; Hiram S Cody; Melissa Pilewskie; Peter Cordeiro; Lisa Sclafani; George Plitas; Mary L Gemignani; Joseph Disa; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  James W Jakub; Anne Warren Peled; Richard J Gray; Rachel A Greenup; John V Kiluk; Virgilio Sacchini; Sarah A McLaughlin; Julia C Tchou; Robert A Vierkant; Amy C Degnim; Shawna Willey
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 5.  Using intraoperative laser angiography to safeguard nipple perfusion in nipple-sparing mastectomies.

Authors:  Monica M Dua; Danielle M Bertoni; Dung Nguyen; Shannon Meyer; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Irene L Wapnir
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction with skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy: the value of tumor-to-dermis distance measured by preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujii; Yuko Nakazawa; Misato Ogino; Sayaka Obayashi; Reina Yajima; Chikako Honda; Hideharu Nakamura; Takaya Makiguchi; Ken Shirabe
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Improvement of tissue survival of skin flaps by 5α-reductase inhibitors: possible involvement of nitric oxide and inducible nitric oxide synthase.

Authors:  Ali Asghar Karimi; Marjan Ajami; Yasin Asadi; Nahid Aboutaleb; Fazel Gorjipour; Roya Malekloo; Hamidreza Pazoki-Toroudi
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2015

9.  [Effect of natural hirudin on revascularization of ischemic skin flaps in rats by Micro-CT].

Authors:  Yuyong Yan; Xinyuan Pan; Bojie Lin; Guanyu Lin; Guoqian Yin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15

10.  Evidence based outcomes of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Registry.

Authors:  Sunny D Mitchell; Shawna C Willey; Peter Beitsch; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.