Literature DB >> 25051172

Transient estrogen receptor binding and p300 redistribution support a squelching mechanism for estradiol-repressed genes.

Michael J Guertin1, Xuesen Zhang, Scott A Coonrod, Gordon L Hager.   

Abstract

Proper gene regulation is essential for proper organismal development and appropriate responses to external stimuli. Specialized factors, termed master regulators, are often responsible for orchestrating the molecular events that result from signaling cascades. Master regulators coordinate the activation and repression of specific gene classes. Estrogen receptor α (ER) precipitates the signaling cascade that results from endogenous or exogenous estrogen hormones. ER is a classic transcriptional activator and the mechanisms by which ER coordinates gene activation are well characterized. However, it remains unclear how ER coordinates the immediate repression of genes. We integrated genomic transcription, chromosome looping, transcription factor binding, and chromatin structure data to analyze the molecular cascade that results from estradiol (E2)-induced signaling in human MCF-7 breast cancer cells and addressed the context-specific nature of gene regulation. We defined a class of genes that are immediately repressed upon estrogen stimulation, and we compared and contrasted the molecular characteristics of these repressed genes vs activated and unregulated genes. The most striking and unique feature of the repressed gene class is transient binding of ER at early time points after estrogen stimulation. We also found that p300, a coactivator and acetyltransferase, quantitatively redistributes from non-ER enhancers to ER enhancers after E2 treatment. These data support an extension of the classic physiological squelching model, whereby ER hijacks coactivators from repressed genes and redistributes the coactivators to ER enhancers that activate transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25051172      PMCID: PMC4154243          DOI: 10.1210/me.2014-1130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0888-8809


  64 in total

1.  JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles.

Authors:  Albin Sandelin; Wynand Alkema; Pär Engström; Wyeth W Wasserman; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  The insulation of genes from external enhancers and silencing chromatin.

Authors:  Bonnie Burgess-Beusse; Catherine Farrell; Miklos Gaszner; Michael Litt; Vesco Mutskov; Felix Recillas-Targa; Melanie Simpson; Adam West; Gary Felsenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional antagonism between oncoprotein c-Jun and steroid hormone receptors.

Authors:  R Schüle; R M Evans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1991

4.  Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites.

Authors:  Jason S Carroll; Clifford A Meyer; Jun Song; Wei Li; Timothy R Geistlinger; Jérôme Eeckhoute; Alexander S Brodsky; Erika Krasnickas Keeton; Kirsten C Fertuck; Giles F Hall; Qianben Wang; Stefan Bekiranov; Victor Sementchenko; Edward A Fox; Pamela A Silver; Thomas R Gingeras; X Shirley Liu; Myles Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Structure of the p300 catalytic core and implications for chromatin targeting and HAT regulation.

Authors:  Manuela Delvecchio; Jonathan Gaucher; Carmen Aguilar-Gurrieri; Esther Ortega; Daniel Panne
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Role of ETS transcription factors in the hypoxia-inducible factor-2 target gene selection.

Authors:  Olga Aprelikova; Matthew Wood; Sean Tackett; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; J Carl Barrett
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Cellular reprogramming by the conjoint action of ERα, FOXA1, and GATA3 to a ligand-inducible growth state.

Authors:  Say Li Kong; Guoliang Li; Siang Lin Loh; Wing-Kin Sung; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Accurate prediction of inducible transcription factor binding intensities in vivo.

Authors:  Michael J Guertin; André L Martins; Adam Siepel; John T Lis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints.

Authors:  Shane Neph; Jeff Vierstra; Andrew B Stergachis; Alex P Reynolds; Eric Haugen; Benjamin Vernot; Robert E Thurman; Sam John; Richard Sandstrom; Audra K Johnson; Matthew T Maurano; Richard Humbert; Eric Rynes; Hao Wang; Shinny Vong; Kristen Lee; Daniel Bates; Morgan Diegel; Vaughn Roach; Douglas Dunn; Jun Neri; Anthony Schafer; R Scott Hansen; Tanya Kutyavin; Erika Giste; Molly Weaver; Theresa Canfield; Peter Sabo; Miaohua Zhang; Gayathri Balasundaram; Rachel Byron; Michael J MacCoss; Joshua M Akey; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Rajinder Kaul; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  UniPROBE: an online database of protein binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Daniel E Newburger; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Governing the Transcriptional Regulation of ESR1.

Authors:  David K Lung; Rebecca M Reese; Elaine T Alarid
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  The Prozone Effect Accounts for the Paradoxical Function of the Cdk-Binding Protein Suc1/Cks.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Ha; Sun Young Kim; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Genome-wide footprinting: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Myong-Hee Sung; Songjoon Baek; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Estrogen receptor α promotes protein synthesis by fine-tuning the expression of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit f (eIF3f).

Authors:  Rafael Cuesta; Adi Y Berman; Anya Alayev; Marina K Holz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Genomic effects of glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Ivana Grbesa; Ofir Hakim
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 6.  Nuclear Receptor Function through Genomics: Lessons from the Glucocorticoid Receptor.

Authors:  Daniel M Cohen; David J Steger
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 12.015

7.  Inflammation-sensitive super enhancers form domains of coordinately regulated enhancer RNAs.

Authors:  Nasun Hah; Chris Benner; Ling-Wa Chong; Ruth T Yu; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Nuclear receptors in cancer - uncovering new and evolving roles through genomic analysis.

Authors:  Vineet K Dhiman; Michael J Bolt; Kevin P White
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Analysis of computational footprinting methods for DNase sequencing experiments.

Authors:  Eduardo G Gusmao; Manuel Allhoff; Martin Zenke; Ivan G Costa
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Universal correction of enzymatic sequence bias reveals molecular signatures of protein/DNA interactions.

Authors:  André L Martins; Ninad M Walavalkar; Warren D Anderson; Chongzhi Zang; Michael J Guertin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.