| Literature DB >> 25050265 |
Badrul Alam1, Fahima Akter1, Nahida Parvin1, Rashna Sharmin Pia1, Sharmin Akter1, Jesmin Chowdhury1, Kazi Sifath-E-Jahan1, Ekramul Haque2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to evaluate the antioxidant, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory activities of the methanolic extract of Piper betle leaves (MPBL).Entities:
Keywords: Analgesic; Anti-inflammatory; Antioxidant; Piper betle
Year: 2013 PMID: 25050265 PMCID: PMC4075698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Yield, total amount of plant phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and total antioxidant capacity of methanolic extract of Piper betle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 39.92 | 136.33 ± 1.02* | 52.16 ± 0.61* | 81.72 ± 0.48* |
The GAE, QA, and ASC values are expressed as Means±SEM of triplicate experiments.
Galic acid equivalents (GAE, mg/g of each extract) for the total phenolic content,
Quercetin equivalent (QA, mg/g of each extract) for the total flavonoid content,
Ascorbic acid equivalent (ASC, mg/g of each extract) for the total antioxidant capacity.
Scavenging/inhibitory effects of the Piper betle extract against DPPH, ONOO-, and Total ROS generation
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16.33±1.02 | 25.16±0.61* | 41.72±0.48 |
|
| 12.10±0.02 | ||
|
| 10.20±0.32 | ||
|
| 12.32±0.19 |
IC50 values are mean±SEM (n=3);
p < 0.001 by student t-test for values between the sample and the control.
Figure 1Values are mean±SEM, Reducing power of MPBL, quercetin, ascorbic acid, and galic acid by spectrophotometric detection of Fe3+ to Fe2+ transformation
Figure 2Effects of the MPBL on latency to hot plate test. Values are mean±SEM, (n=5); *p<0.05 as compared with vehicle control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received nalbuphine 10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the crude extract of P. betle, respectively
Effects of the MPBL on acetic acid-induced writhing in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vehicle | 34.40 | |
|
| 10 | 10.60 | 69.19 |
|
| 100 | 19.80 | 42.44 |
|
| 200 | 12.27 | 64.53 |
Values are mean±SEM, (n=5);
p<0.05 as compared with vehicle control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received diclofenac Na 10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the MPBL.
Effect of MPBL in hindpaw licking in the formalin test in mice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Vehicle | 34.16 ± 1.38 | - | 47.0 ± 1.03 | - |
|
| 10 | 16.83 ± 0.90 | 50.73 | 19.83 ± 0.70 | 57.80 |
|
| 100 | 27.5 ± 0.76 | 19.51 | 21.5 ± 0.95 | 54.25 |
|
| 200 | 18.00 ± 0.65 | 47.31 | 20.67 ± 1.46 | 56.02 |
Values are mean±SEM, (n=5);
p<0.05 as compared to vehicle control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received diclofenac Na 10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the MPBL, respectively.
Figure 3Effects of the MPBL on carrageenan-induced paw edema test. Values are mean±SEM, (n=5); *p<0.05 as compared to vehicle control (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). Group I animals received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water), Group II received indomethacin10 mg/kg body weight, Group III and Group IV were treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight (p.o.) of the crude extract of P. betle, respectively