Literature DB >> 25050221

Smac mimetics combined with innate immune stimuli create the perfect cytokine storm to kill tumor cells.

Shawn T Beug1, Eric C LaCasse1, Robert G Korneluk2.   

Abstract

A dual immunotherapy approach employing small-molecule inhibitors of apoptosis (IAP) protein antagonists in combination with innate immune stimuli has proven to be highly synergistic and effective in animal tumor models. This strategy overcomes many of the limitations of either single agent therapy and our results suggest that the combination could be easily and effectively translated to the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CpG; Smac mimetic; TNFα; XIAP; bystander effect; cIAP1; cIAP2; immunotherapy; interferon (IFN); oncolytic virus; poly(I:C)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25050221      PMCID: PMC4063156          DOI: 10.4161/onci.28541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Chemical mimetics of the pro-apoptotic protein, DIABLO, better known as second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac), are small molecule antagonists that repress key inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) proteins – cellular IAP1 (cIAP1) and cellular IAP2 (cIAP2) – by binding and targeting them for degradation. Depending on the compound affinity, specificity, and dosage, Smac mimetics also antagonize or lead to the degradation of X-linked IAP (XIAP), another apoptotic suppressor protein. Several of these Smac mimetics are currently in early phase clinical trials as anticancer agents. The Smac mimetic-induced loss of cIAP1/cIAP2, two critical regulators of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling, sensitizes cancer cells to TNFα- or TNF-related apoptosis-inducing TNF ligand (i.e., TRAIL)-mediated death. Importantly, Smac mimetics require the presence of these pro-death cytokine ligands for maximal efficacy. However, to date, methods to safely and effectively provide an exogenous source of these cytokines to cancer patients undergoing treatment with Smac mimetics, an action that, conceptually, could boost antitumor efficacy, have yet to be developed. We recently discovered that infection of tumor-bearing mice with an oncolytic virus, or alternatively, treatment with a synthetic immune mimetic, can give rise to a cytokine storm (including TNFα and TRAIL) of sufficient intensity to kill tumor cells co-treated with various monovalent or bivalent Smac mimetics (containing one or two IAP binding motifs, respectively). We demonstrated synergistic killing of tumor cells in multiple treatment-refractory cancer models in vivo, such as breast and colorectal cancer, leading to increased survival and, in some cases, in durable cures. In addition, treatment of many other types of malignancy (e.g., renal, glioblastoma, and multiple myeloma) demonstrated synergistic combinatorial activities in vitro. This published study also demonstrated the following key points: 1. The Smac mimetic synergy with an oncolytic virus was highly potentiated specifically within the class of vesiculoviruses, typified in our study by two examples of oncolytic rhabdoviruses, Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Maraba in studies in vitro. The attenuated oncolytic rhabdoviruses are negative sense RNA viruses that replicate quickly and produce a strong interferon (IFN) response. This immune response limits viral spread, thereby suppressing the cancer-killing efficacy of the oncolytic virus but protects the host from viremia. However, viral infection, lysis, and the release of tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) ultimately triggers the immune response to aid in the eradication of tumors. 2. The combination effect did not exclusively require the local production of cytokines at the site of the tumor, such that we observed systemic production of cytokines to be highly efficacious. In addition, the combination was well tolerated by the animals with acceptable and transient losses in body weight. 3. The cancer cytotoxic effects were mediated by various cytokines, notably Type I or Type II IFNs, as well as TNFα or TRAIL. This was the first demonstration of Smac mimetic synergy with IFNs. Our findings raise the possibility of combining existing immunotherapies comprising recombinant IFN with Smac mimetics in the treatment of cancer. 4. The anticancer effect from the combinatorial treatment was primarily mediated by the innate immune response. However, we could not completely exclude the involvement of the adaptive response, as this arm of the immune system is broadly known to contribute to long-term remission or cure. In a separate report, Dougan and colleagues show that Smac mimetics enhance T-cell antitumor immunity in a cancer vaccine mouse model, suggesting that Smac mimetics can exert a multitude of beneficial antitumor immune effects via distinct mechanisms. In fact, the IAPs regulate many aspects of immunity (For a review see ref. 6), and IAP antagonism with Smac mimetics in cancer patients is expected to have numerous immune-mediated anticancer effects. 5. Oncolytic virus triggering of the innate immune response could be replaced with non-infectious immunostimulatory molecules, such as the adjuvants poly(I:C) or CpG oligonucleotides. These synthetic pathogen mimetics effectively synergizes with Smac mimetics to significantly induce tumor regression, resulting in durable cures. 6. The direct infection of all the cancer cells with an oncolytic virus was not required, as non-infected tumor cells could be killed by a bystander mechanism, at least partially due to the induction of diffusible and circulating cytokines (Fig. 1). This cytokine storm produces a cloud of tumor cell death that could be clearly visualized in a virus-spreading assay using an agarose overlay (refer to supplemental data in ref. 2).

Figure 1. Cytokine-mediated synergy of Smac mimetics and an oncolytic virus or synthetic Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist. Infection with oncolytic viruses or treatment with immunostimulatory TLR agonists in various cell types (tumor, macrophages or other cells from the host) leads to the production of interferons, such as IFNβ, which in turn, leads to the production of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Notably, the production of these cytokines is enhanced in the presence of Smac mimetics. Treatment of tumor cells with Smac mimetics leads to the degradation and/or inhibition of the cellular inhibitors of apoptosis (cIAP1/2) and X-linked IAP (XIAP) proteins. Subsequently, the cytokines induce caspase-8- and RIP1-dependent bystander death of Smac mimetic treated tumor cells. RIP1, receptor interacting protein kinase 1; Smac, second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases; SMC, Smac mimetic compound.

Figure 1. Cytokine-mediated synergy of Smac mimetics and an oncolytic virus or synthetic Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist. Infection with oncolytic viruses or treatment with immunostimulatory TLR agonists in various cell types (tumor, macrophages or other cells from the host) leads to the production of interferons, such as IFNβ, which in turn, leads to the production of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Notably, the production of these cytokines is enhanced in the presence of Smac mimetics. Treatment of tumor cells with Smac mimetics leads to the degradation and/or inhibition of the cellular inhibitors of apoptosis (cIAP1/2) and X-linked IAP (XIAP) proteins. Subsequently, the cytokines induce caspase-8- and RIP1-dependent bystander death of Smac mimetic treated tumor cells. RIP1, receptor interacting protein kinase 1; Smac, second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases; SMC, Smac mimetic compound. 7. Smac mimetic treatment did not alter or compromise the host antiviral response to oncolytic VSV infection, contrary to a previous report wherein the loss of cIAP1/2 was shown to lead to an increase in the titer of VSV. In fact, two additional studies have also demonstrated that Smac mimetic treatments do not hinder antiviral responses in mice., A number of the above mentioned immunotherapy agents and derivatives are currently in cancer clinical trials as monotherapies. Our pre-clinical studies indicate that specific combinatorial immunotherapies involving Smac mimetics may be more efficacious than the single-agent approaches, and that these combinatorial approaches are amenable to translation to the clinical setting. Our combination approach provides the essential death triggers (TNFα, TRAIL, and/or IFN) needed for maximal Smac mimetic efficacy in vivo. Even in scenarios where viral spread and oncolysis is limited, widespread bystander killing of uninfected tumor cells could occur as a result of the induction of cytokines through the systemic stimulation of the innate immune response. The idea of combining multiple immunotherapies is one that is likely to flourish with the advent of effective anticancer treatments that are being approved for clinical use, such as blocking antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4,) programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, better known as PD-1) or PD1 ligand (PD-L1). Analogous to the use of chemotherapy cocktail approaches to circumvent tumor resistance or to provide drug synergy, the combination of various cancer immunotherapies with Smac mimetics can also be viewed as an effective multipronged approach that could potentially avoid neoplastic or malignant cell resistance to immune attack or apoptotic induction, and would thus be likely to synergistically ablate cancer cells.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Matthew Vanneman; Glenn Dranoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Targeting IAP proteins for therapeutic intervention in cancer.

Authors:  Simone Fulda; Domagoj Vucic
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein cIAP2 protects against pulmonary tissue necrosis during influenza virus infection to promote host survival.

Authors:  Ian Gaël Rodrigue-Gervais; Katherine Labbé; Maryse Dagenais; Jeremy Dupaul-Chicoine; Claudia Champagne; Alexandre Morizot; Alexander Skeldon; Erik L Brincks; Silvia M Vidal; Thomas S Griffith; Maya Saleh
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 21.023

4.  IAP inhibitors enhance co-stimulation to promote tumor immunity.

Authors:  Michael Dougan; Stephanie Dougan; Joanna Slisz; Brant Firestone; Matthew Vanneman; Dobrin Draganov; Girija Goyal; Weibo Li; Donna Neuberg; Richard Blumberg; Nir Hacohen; Dale Porter; Leigh Zawel; Glenn Dranoff
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Virus-triggered ubiquitination of TRAF3/6 by cIAP1/2 is essential for induction of interferon-beta (IFN-beta) and cellular antiviral response.

Authors:  Ai-Ping Mao; Shu Li; Bo Zhong; Ying Li; Jie Yan; Qi Li; Chengwen Teng; Hong-Bing Shu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Modulation of immune signalling by inhibitors of apoptosis.

Authors:  Shawn T Beug; Herman H Cheung; Eric C LaCasse; Robert G Korneluk
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 16.687

7.  MAVS recruits multiple ubiquitin E3 ligases to activate antiviral signaling cascades.

Authors:  Siqi Liu; Jueqi Chen; Xin Cai; Jiaxi Wu; Xiang Chen; You-Tong Wu; Lijun Sun; Zhijian J Chen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Oncolytic virotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen J Russell; Kah-Whye Peng; John C Bell
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Cytokine determinants of viral tropism.

Authors:  Grant McFadden; Mohamed R Mohamed; Masmudur M Rahman; Eric Bartee
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 53.106

10.  Smac mimetics and innate immune stimuli synergize to promote tumor death.

Authors:  Shawn T Beug; Vera A Tang; Eric C LaCasse; Herman H Cheung; Caroline E Beauregard; Jan Brun; Jeffrey P Nuyens; Nathalie Earl; Martine St-Jean; Janelle Holbrook; Himika Dastidar; Douglas J Mahoney; Carolina Ilkow; Fabrice Le Boeuf; John C Bell; Robert G Korneluk
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 54.908

  10 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Trial Watch-Immunostimulation with cytokines in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Fernando Aranda; Norma Bloy; Aitziber Buqué; Isabelle Cremer; Alexander Eggermont; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jitka Fucikova; Jérôme Galon; Radek Spisek; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  Selective and Potent CDK8/19 Inhibitors Enhance NK-Cell Activity and Promote Tumor Surveillance.

Authors:  Marco H Hofmann; Rajeswaran Mani; Harald Engelhardt; Maria A Impagnatiello; Sebastian Carotta; Marc Kerenyi; Seila Lorenzo-Herrero; Jark Böttcher; Dirk Scharn; Heribert Arnhof; Andreas Zoephel; Renate Schnitzer; Thomas Gerstberger; Michael P Sanderson; Girish Rajgolikar; Swagata Goswami; Sumithira Vasu; Peter Ettmayer; Segundo Gonzalez; Mark Pearson; Darryl B McConnell; Norbert Kraut; Natarajan Muthusamy; Jürgen Moll
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  XIAP inhibitor Embelin inhibits bladder cancer survival and invasion in vitro.

Authors:  X Fu; X Pang; H Qi; S Chen; Y Li; W Tan
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Inducing death in tumor cells: roles of the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins.

Authors:  Darren Finlay; Peter Teriete; Mitchell Vamos; Nicholas D P Cosford; Kristiina Vuori
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 5.  Overcoming chemotherapy drug resistance by targeting inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs).

Authors:  Rama Rathore; Jennifer E McCallum; Elizabeth Varghese; Ana-Maria Florea; Dietrich Büsselberg
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Targeting triple-negative breast cancers with the Smac-mimetic birinapant.

Authors:  Delphine Merino; Goknur Giner; François Vaillant; Najoua Lalaoui; Diep Chau; Lin Liu; Tobias Kratina; Bhupinder Pal; James R Whittle; Nima Etemadi; Jean Berthelet; Julius Gräsel; Cathrine Hall; Matthew E Ritchie; Matthias Ernst; Gordon K Smyth; David L Vaux; Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman; John Silke
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  The IAP antagonist birinapant potentiates bortezomib anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Liang Zhou; Yu Zhang; Yun Leng; Yun Dai; Maciej Kmieciak; Lora Kramer; Kanika Sharma; Yan Wang; William Craun; Steven Grant
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Characterization of Potent SMAC Mimetics that Sensitize Cancer Cells to TNF Family-Induced Apoptosis.

Authors:  Kate Welsh; Snezana Milutinovic; Robert J Ardecky; Marcos Gonzalez-Lopez; Santhi Reddy Ganji; Peter Teriete; Darren Finlay; Stefan Riedl; Shu-Ichi Matsuzawa; Clemencia Pinilla; Richard Houghten; Kristiina Vuori; John C Reed; Nicholas D P Cosford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Oncolytic virus synergizes with Smac mimetic compounds to induce rhabdomyosarcoma cell death in a syngeneic murine model.

Authors:  Christine C Dobson; Thet Naing; Shawn T Beug; Mame D Faye; Janelle Chabot; Martin St-Jean; Danielle E Walker; Eric C LaCasse; David F Stojdl; Robert G Korneluk; Martin Holcik
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-10

Review 10.  The Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Antagonists in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica Michie; Conor J Kearney; Edwin D Hawkins; John Silke; Jane Oliaro
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.