Literature DB >> 25050041

Ileal digestibility of amino acids in meat meal and soybean meal fed to growing pigs.

C Kong1, H G Kang1, B G Kim1, K H Kim2.   

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to determine the concentration and digestibility of crude protein (CP) and amino acid (AA) in meat meal (MM), and to compare these values with the respective values in soybean meal (SBM). Six barrows (initial body weight = 66.9±3.8 kg) surgically fitted with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were allotted to a replicated 3×3 balanced Latin square design with 3 diets and 3 periods. Two experimental diets containing test ingredients as the sole source of AA were prepared to estimate the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) for CP and AA by the direct method. An N-free diet was also prepared to estimate basal endogenous losses of CP and AA. All experimental diets contained 5% chromic oxide as an indigestible index. Each period consisted of a 5-d adaptation period and a 2-d of ileal digesta collection period. Ileal digesta samples were collected from 0900 to 1700 on d 6 and 7 of each period. The concentrations of CP, Lys, Met, and Trp in MM and SBM were analyzed to be 64.1, 3.5, 1.1 and 0.6, and 45.6, 2.8, 0.8, and 0.3%, respectively. The AID of all AA except Gly in MM was less (p<0.05) than in SBM. The AID of Lys, Met, and Trp in MM was estimated to be 56.0, 71.7, and 47.1%, respectively. The SID of all AA in MM was less (p<0.05) than in SBM. The SID of Lys, Met, and Trp was 65.1, 79.2, and 78.5%, respectively. In conclusion, the CP and AA contents in MM were greater than those in SBM whereas the ileal digestibility of all AA in MM was less than in SBM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedstuff; Meat Meal; Soybean Meal; Standardized Ileal Digestibility; Swine

Year:  2014        PMID: 25050041      PMCID: PMC4093576          DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci        ISSN: 1011-2367            Impact factor:   2.509


INTRODUCTION

An accurate formulation of a swine diet meeting amino acid (AA) requirements is imn>an class="Chemical">portant to improve swine production as well as to minimize the excretion of N. Several types of ingredient have been used as major protein sources for swine feed formulation including plant and animal origin proteins (Jørgensen et al., 1984; Stein et al., 2001; Gottlob et al., 2006). It has been also shown that protein sources vary widely in terms of their ability to supply AA utilizable for protein synthesis for pigs (Stein et al., 2001). Thus, it is essential to estimate N and AA utilization. Among estimates for the digestibility of these nutrients, ileal digestibility rather than total tract digestibility has been known to be more reliable to represent AA digestibility (Sauer and Ozimek, 1986). To attain ileal digestible AA contents in a diet or a feed ingredient, apparent ileal digestibility (AID) has been used, but it has been reported that AID does not account for the endogenous AA which is derived from animal body, and consequently, is underestimated especially when feeding pigs a low-protein diet (Mosenthin et al., 2000). To overcome this inaccuracy of AID estimate, the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) which is corrected for AID with basal endogenous losses (BEL) of AA, has been suggested for estimating the ileal digestibility of AA (Jondreville et al., 1995). Meat meal (MM) is defined as the rendered product from mammal tissues, exclusive of blood, hair, hoof, horn, hide trimmings, manure, stomach and rumen contents (AAFCO, 2010) and is commonly included in swine diet as a protein source (Traylor et al., 2005). The SID for MM has been provided in NRC (2012). However, there are large variations in crude protein (CP) and AA contents in MM as well as their digestible contents. Moreover, there is a scarcity of data on the digestibility of CP and AA in MM for pigs. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the SID for CP and AA in MM fed to growing-finishing pigs and to compare the digestibility values with those in soybean meal (SBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the experimental pan class="Chemical">procedures used in the current study were appan class="Chemical">proved by the National Institute of Animal Science Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Animals and experimental design

Six crossbred barrows with an average initial body weight (BW) of 66.9 kg (standard deviation = 3.8) fitted with a T-cannula at the distal ileum using surgery procedures adapted from Stein et al. (1998) were used to determine the CP and AA digestibility in SBM and MM (Table 1). n>an class="Species">Pigs were individually housed in metabolism crates (0.48×1.49 m) in an environmentally controlled room at the National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea. The 6 barrows were assigned to 3 dietary treatments in a replicated 3×3 Latin square design involving 3 periods per square. Potential carryover effects were balanced using a program developed by Kim and Stein (2009).
Table 1

Analyzed nutrient composition of soybean meal and meat meal, as-is basis

ItemSoybean meal (%)Meat meal (%)
Ingredient
 Dry matter87.796.5
 Ether extract1.48.5
 Ash5.922.3
 Calcium0.166.83
 Phosphorus0.643.76
 Crude protein45.664.1
Indispensable amino acid
 Arg3.25.1
 His1.71.8
 Ile2.01.8
 Leu3.64.0
 Lys2.83.5
 Met0.81.1
 Phe2.42.2
 Thr1.92.0
 Trp0.30.6
 Val2.02.6
Dispensable amino acid
 Ala2.05.2
 Asp5.05.1
 Cys1.00.6
 Glu7.58.1
 Gly1.910.5
 Pro2.56.7
 Ser2.52.6
 Tyr1.61.5

Diets and feeding

Two experimental diets were prepared to contain SBM or MM as the sole source of CP and AA (Tables 2 and 3). An N-free diet was also prepared mainly based on cornstarch and sucrose to estimate the basal endogenous AA losses. Chromic oxide was included at 0.5% as an indigestible index for the calculation of digestibility. Vitamins and trace minerals were included in all diets to meet or exceed nutrient requirement estimates (NRC, 1998).
Table 2

Ingredient composition of the experimental diets, as-fed basis

ItemExperimental diet (%)

Soybean mealMeat mealN-Free
Ingredient
 Soybean meal35.0--
 Meat meal-25.0-
 Corn starch39.053.768.6
 Sucrose20.020.020.0
 Soybean oil3.0-4.0
 Cellulose--3.5
 Ground limestone0.7-0.8
 Dicalcium phosphate1.0-1.3
 Potassium carbonate--0.4
 Magnesium oxide--0.1
 Salt0.40.40.4
 Vitamin-mineral premix10.40.40.4
 Chromic oxide0.50.50.5

Provided the following quantities per kg of complete diet: vitamin A, 20,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,200 IU; vitamin E, 40 IU; vitamin K, 4.0 mg; thiamin, 3.9 mg; riboflavin, 8.0 mg; pyridoxine, 3.9 mg; vitamin B12, 0.05 mg; pantothenic acid, 30.0 mg; folic acid, 0.88 mg; niacin, 50 mg; biotin, 0.05 mg; Cu, 20 mg as copper sulfate; Fe, 214 mg as iron sulfate; I, 4.0 mg as potassium iodate; Mn, 100 mg as manganese sulfate; Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite; Zn, 251 mg as zinc oxide; and butylated hydroxytoluene, 40 mg.

Table 3

Analyzed nutrient composition of experimental diets, as-fed basis

ItemExperimental diet (%)

Soybean mealMeat mealN-free
Ingredient
 Dry matter90.991.490.3
 Ether extract3.32.23.1
 Ash4.55.93.7
 Crude protein16.916.30.3
Indispensable amino acid
 Arg1.11.2ND
 His0.60.5ND
 Ile0.70.4ND
 Leu1.30.9ND
 Lys1.00.8ND
 Met0.30.3ND
 Phe0.80.5ND
 Thr0.70.5ND
 Trp0.20.1ND
 Val0.70.6ND
Dispensable amino acid
 Ala0.71.3ND
 Asp2.01.3ND
 Cys0.30.2ND
 Glu3.02.0ND
 Gly0.72.5ND
 Pro0.81.7ND
 Ser0.90.6ND
 Tyr0.50.3ND

ND, not detectable.

Pigs were allowed to consume diets 2 times a day at 0900 and 1700 and daily feed allowance was 3 times the estimated maintenance requirement for energy (i.e., 106 kcal of ME/kg BW0.75). Water was freely available through a nipple at all times.

Data recording and sample collection

Pigs were weighed at the beginning of each period, and the amount of feed provided each day were recorded. Each period consisted of a 5-d acclimation period to the feed and a 2-d ileal collection period. Ileal samples were collected from T-cannula for 8 h on d 6 and 7 according to the procedure described by Kim et al. (2012). Briefly, a plastic bag was attached to the cannula barrel using a wire embedded in the bag. The plastic bag was inspected at 30-min intervals and changed as needed. Immediately after digesta collection, the sample was frozen to prevent bacterial degradation of AA in the digesta. At the end of each period, animals were fasted and a new experimental diet was provided on the next morning meal.

Chemical analyses

The frozen ileal samples were thawed at room temperature, pooled for each n>an class="Species">pig within each period and subsampled. The digesta samples were freeze-dried and finely ground prior to chemical analysis. All samples were analyzed for dry matter (DM) (method 930.15; AOAC, 2005) by drying samples at 135°C in a drying oven (FE-PO-150; Dongseo Science Co. Ltd., Seongnam, Korea) for 2 h. Nitrogen for CP content (N×6.25) was analyzed by the Kjeldahl method (Kjeltec 1035; Foss, Hillerod, Denmark). Samples for AA analysis were prepared using a 24-h hydrolysis in 6 N HCl at 110°C under an atmosphere of N. For Met and Cys, performic acid oxidation was done prior to acid hydrolysis. Samples for Trp analysis were hydrolyzed using barium hydroxide. Amino acids in hydrolysates were determined by HPLC after post-column derivatization (method 982.30 E [a, b, c], AOAC, 2005). Chromium was analyzed using the atomic absorption spectrophotometry (IRIS Intre PID II XSP, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). A 10 g of sample was put into the crucible. One ml of 3-potassium phosphate solution was added and mixed thoroughly using a glass rod. The solution was burned in the electric furnace at 800°C. After freezing it, the residue in the crucible was diluted using distilled water. The solution was massed up to 250 mL in a flask and left it overnight. On the next day, the liquid was filtered to be used as a test solution.

Calculation and statistical analyses

The AID for CP and AA in SBM and MM was estimated by the direct pan class="Chemical">method described by Stein et al. (2007). Because the test ingredient was the only source contributing CP and AA in each diet, the estimated AID of these nutrients in the experimental diet also represented the respective digestibility for each ingredient. The AID, pan class="Disease">SID, and BEL were calculated using the following equations (adapted from Stein et al., 2007): where AAdiet and AAdigesta are the AA concentration in the diet and ileal digesta, respectively (g/kg of DM); and Crdiet and Crdigesta are the chromium concentration of the diet and ileal digesta, respectively (g/kg of DM); IAAend is the BEL of an AA (g/kg of DMI). The AID and SID of CP was also calculated as AA in equation (1) and (3) replaced by CP. The experimental data were statistically analyzed using MIXED procedures of n>an class="Gene">SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The independent variables in the model included diet as a fixed effect and animal and period as random effects. Digestibility was response variable and each animal was considered as an experimental unit. The alpha level used for the determination of statistical differences was set at 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Nutrient composition of test ingredients

The analyzed nutrient composition of SBM and MM used in the current study is n>an class="Chemical">provided in Table 1. The results for SBM showed that the proximate analyses and the analyzed AA composition were comparable with the values reported in NRC (2012) whereas the respective composition of MM was greater in CP and less in ether extract than the values reported in NRC (2012). The difference in the chemical composition of MM between the current study and NRC (2012) may be attributed to the effects of location and source of MM (Wang and Parsons, 1998). Meat meal and meat and bone meal (MBM) have been similarly defined except that MBM contains more bone and the P level is 4.0% or greater and the Ca level of both products is less than 2.2 times the P level (AAFCO, 2010). The concentration of P and Ca in MM used in the present experiment met the criterion for MM by AAFCO (2010). The ash content of MM used in the current study was analyzed to be 22.3% which is similar to the value for MM reported in NRC (2012) and less than that of MBM (32.0%) which is due to the difference in bone contents between the 2 ingredients.

Apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids

The respective AID of AA in pigs for SBM and MM was 79.3 and 56.0% for Lys, 84.7 and 71.7% for Met, and 69.0 and 38.9% for Thr, respectively (Table 4). The AID of the indispensable AA determined at the terminal ileum averaged in 75.7 and 52.8% for SBM and MM, respectively. The AID of all indispensable AA were greater (p<0.05) in SBM than those in MBM except Gly (p = 0.30). This is in agreement with the reported values in NRC (2012) for MM as well as those for MBM (Jørgensen et al., 1984). For the AID of indispensable AA, His was the least digestible AA followed by Thr and Trp. It has been reported that major protein source of MM is collagen (Eastoe and Eastoe, 1954) which is void of Trp. In addition to low concentration of Trp in MM products, it has also been reported that the lowest AID of indispensable AA for MM was Trp (NRC, 2012), which was confirmed in the current study. The lowest AID of indispensable AA was His at 4.3% and this was lower compared with the values reported in NRC (2012). The reason for this discrepancy is unclear but it might be, at least in part, related to BEL of His. The BEL of His was determined to be 3.10 g/kg DMI which is very high compared with values reported in other studies (Kim et al., 2012; Park et al., 2013; Son et al., 2014) and consequently the AID of His for both SBM and MM was considerably less than those reported in NRC (2012). The BEL of Thr also had a similar issue as in His. However, we were unaware of any explanation why the BEL of His and Thr was much greater than the values in the literature.
Table 4

Apparent ileal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids in soybean meal and meat meal1

ItemTest ingredient (%)SEMp-value

Soybean mealMeat meal
Ingredient
 Crude protein72.946.93.0<0.001
Indispensable amino acid
 Arg85.771.42.30.002
 His39.74.33.4<0.001
 Ile81.357.72.2<0.001
 Leu80.861.12.0<0.001
 Lys79.356.02.0<0.001
 Met84.771.71.6<0.001
 Phe82.264.21.9<0.001
 Thr69.038.92.6<0.001
 Trp78.447.12.80.002
 Val76.055.52.4<0.001
Dispensable amino acid
 Ala73.357.63.00.004
 Asp75.59.84.1<0.001
 Cys66.15.54.1<0.001
 Glu82.751.22.6<0.001
 Gly53.344.06.00.300
 Pro66.345.05.60.023
 Ser74.636.33.2<0.001
 Tyr79.941.03.9<0.001

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Each least squares mean represents 6 observations.

The respective SID of AA in pigs for SBM, or MM was 86.7, or 65.1% for Lys, 92.8, or 79.2% for Met, and 88.7, or 65.9% for Thr (Table 5). The digestibility corrected with BEL of the indispensable AA averaged in 91.7 and 64.6% for SBM and MM, respectively, which are greater for SBM and less for MM than the average values of the respective ingredients reported in NRC (2012; 87.4% for SBM and 77.1% for MM). For the dispensable AA, Pro was the most digestible AA for both SBM (143%) and MM (81.8%) whereas Cys (83.6%) or Asp (22.6%) was the least digestible AA for SBM or MM, respectively. Although the maximum SID cannot exceed 100%, the SID of Pro in SBM exceeded 100%. This indicates that the endogenous level of Pro might be overestimated and this result was in agreement with previous research using an N-free diet for the estimation of the BEL of AA (de Lange et al, 1989; Stein et al., 2005).
Table 5

Standardized ileal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids in soybean meal and meat meal1,2

ItemTest ingredient (%)SEMp-value

Soybean mealMeat meal
Ingredient
 Crude protein88.863.53.0<0.001
Indispensable amino acid
 Arg94.780.42.30.002
 His86.462.33.40.001
 Ile89.071.42.2<0.001
 Leu88.972.42.0<0.001
 Lys86.765.12.0<0.001
 Met92.879.21.6<0.001
 Phe88.975.01.90.001
 Thr88.765.92.6<0.001
 Trp92.378.52.80.002
 Val88.270.32.4<0.001
Dispensable amino acid
 Ala86.765.23.00.001
 Asp83.922.64.1<0.001
 Cys83.643.54.1<0.001
 Glu88.760.32.6<0.001
 Gly89.853.96.00.002
 Pro143.281.85.6<0.001
 Ser88.956.03.2<0.001
 Tyr89.159.03.9<0.001

SEM, standard error of the mean.

Each least squares mean represents 6 observations.

Standardized ileal digestibility was calculated by correcting apparent ileal digestibility for the basal ileal endogenous losses. Basal ileal endogenous losses were determined from pigs fed the N-free diet as (g/kg DMI): CP, 29.6; Arg, 1.13; His, 3.10; Ile, 0.61; Leu, 1.14; Lys, 0.83; Met, 0.24; Phe, 0.60; Thr, 1.45; Trp, 0.32; Val, 0.98; Ala, 1.04; Asp, 1.83; Cys, 0.64; Glu, 1.97; Gly, 2.75, Pro, 6.74; Ser, 1.38; and Tyr, 0.51.

In the current study, the concentrations of CP and AA in MM were greater than those in SBM whereas the AID and SID of all AA in MM were less than the values in SBM. Similar results were ren>an class="Chemical">ported in the previous study in which MBM was evaluated for 3 different physiological stage groups of pigs (Stein et al., 2001). Cromwell et al. (1991) suggested that the reduction of pig performance with the high level of MM feeding was caused by the excessive Ca and P intake, or a reduction in the overall AA balance in the diet. In conclusion, the results from the present study provided the concentration as well as ileal digestibility of CP and AA in SBM and MM and also indicated that the levels of CP and AA in MM were greater than those in SBM whereas the apparent and SID of all AA were less in MM compared with the digestibility of AA in SBM. This information is valuable for accurate swine diet formulations. However, considering that MM or MBM products have a relatively large variation in the nutrient contents (Parson et al., 1997) due to the variation in the raw materials and manufacturing process conditions, further research to determine the variability in the availability of CP and AA for MM products should be warranted.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application.

Authors:  H H Stein; B Sève; M F Fuller; P J Moughan; C F M de Lange
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Technical note: a technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows.

Authors:  H H Stein; C F Shipley; R A Easter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effect of feeding different protein-free diets on the recovery and amino acid composition of endogenous protein collected from the distal ileum and feces in pigs.

Authors:  C F de Lange; W C Sauer; R Mosenthin; W B Souffrant
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Protein and amino acid quality of meat and bone meal.

Authors:  C M Parsons; F Castanon; Y Han
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Bioavailability of phosphorus in meat and bone meal for swine.

Authors:  S L Traylor; G L Cromwell; M D Lindemann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Additivity of values for apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in mixed diets fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  H H Stein; C Pedersen; A R Wirt; R A Bohlke
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Amino acid and energy digestibility of protein sources for growing pigs.

Authors:  R O Gottlob; J M DeRouchey; M D Tokach; R D Goodband; S S Dritz; J L Nelssen; C W Hastad; D A Knabe
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Standardized ileal protein and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs and sows.

Authors:  H H Stein; S W Kim; T T Nielsen; R A Easter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Amino acid supplementation of meat meal in lysine-fortified, corn-based diets for growing-finishing pigs.

Authors:  G L Cromwell; T S Stahly; H J Monegue
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Concentrations of analyzed or reactive lysine, but not crude protein, may predict the concentration of digestible lysine in distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs.

Authors:  B G Kim; D Y Kil; Y Zhang; H H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Protein quality of soy and the effect of processing: A quantitative review.

Authors:  Lisa A van den Berg; Jurriaan J Mes; Marco Mensink; Anne J Wanders
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.