| Literature DB >> 25049978 |
Arlindo Saran Netto1, Marcus Antônio Zanetti1, Gustavo Ribeiro Del Claro1, Mariza Pires de Melo2, Flávio Garcia Vilela3, Lisia Bertonha Correa1.
Abstract
Twenty-eight Brangus cattle were used to determine the effect of copper and selenium supplementation on performance, feed efficiency, composition of fatty acids in Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle, and cholesterol concentration in serum and in LD muscle and enzymes activities, reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG). The treatments were: i) Control, without copper (Cu) and selenium (Se) supplementation; ii) Se, 2 mg Se/kg of dry matter such as sodium selenite; iii) Cu, 40 mg Cu/kg of dry matter such as copper sulfate; iv) Se/Cu, 2 mg Se/kg of dry matter such as sodium selenite and 40 mg Cu/kg of dry matter such as copper sulfate. LD muscle fatty acid composition was not influenced by the treatments (p>0.05). The serum concentration of cholesterol was not influenced by the treatments (p>0.05), however, the concentration of cholesterol in LD was lower in cattle supplemented with copper and selenium (p<0.05). Oxidized glutathione and reduced glutathione increased (p<0.05) with Cu, Se and Se/Cu supplementation. The supplementation of copper (40 mg/kg DM) and selenium (2 mg/kg DM) altered the metabolism of lipids in confined Brangus cattle, through a decrease in cholesterol deposition in the LD, possibly by changing the ratio between reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione. Copper and selenium supplementation improved animal performance and feed efficiency (p<0.05) when compared to the control group, providing advantages in the production system, while also benefiting consumers by reducing cholesterol concentration in the meat.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle; Cholesterol; Fatty Acids; Minerals; Nutrition
Year: 2014 PMID: 25049978 PMCID: PMC4093533 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Composition of the basal diet (dry matter)
| Ingredients and nutrients | (g/100 g) |
|---|---|
| Corn silage | 25.000 |
| Ground corn | 64.200 |
| Extruded soybean | 7.875 |
| Urea | 0.967 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 0.300 |
| Salt | 0.285 |
| Limestone | 0.600 |
| Rumensin | 0.022 |
| Mineral | 0.750 |
| Nutrients by analysis | |
| Crude protein (%) | 12.90 |
| Ether extract (%) | 4.21 |
| NDF (%) | 18.34 |
| ADF (%) | 16.05 |
| Copper | 5.80 |
| Selenium | 0.06 |
Ca 115 g/kg; P 65 g/kg; S 30 g/kg; Mg 11g/kg; Na 188 g/kg; Co 80 mg/kg; Cu 1,200 mg/kg; I 83 mg/kg; Mn 1,400 mg/kg; Se 20 mg/kg; Zn 400 mg/kg.
Analyzed values copper and selenium in treatments: T2 = Copper 5.88 mg/kg and selenium 2.09 mg/kg DM; T3 = Copper 46.01 mg/kg and selenium 0.05 mg/kg DM; T4 = Copper 45.93 mg/kg and selenium 2.01 mg/kg DM.
Feed intake (kg DM), feed efficiency (weight gain/dry matter intake), average daily weight gain and standard deviations of cattle receiving the control diet, supplemented with selenium, copper or selenium/copper
| Treatments | Contrasts | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| C | Se | Cu | Se/Cu | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| Feed intake (kg) | 10.91b±2.32 | 11.27 a±1.98 | 11.05a±2.54 | 11.78 a±1.88 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Feed efficiency | 0.09c±0.01 | 0.12a±0.01 | 0.11ab±0.01 | 0.10b±0.01 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.78 |
| Daily weight gain (kg) | 0.98b±0.24 | 1.35a±0.14 | 1.21ab±0.17 | 1.18ab±0.24 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.84 |
C = Control diet (without supplementation of copper and selenium); Se = Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM).
Cu = Suplementation of copper (40 mg/kg of DM); Se/Cu = Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM) and copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
A = Control X Se; B = Control X Cu; C = Control X Se/Cu; D = Se X Cu; E = Se X Se/Cu; F = Cu X Se/Cu.
Means followed by different letters in rows differ (p<0.05).
Profile of fatty acids in Longissimus dorsi muscle of cattle receiving control diet, selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), copper (40 mg/kg of DM) and selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM)
| Item | Treatments | Contrasts | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Control | Selenium | Copper | Se/Cu | A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| ———g/100 g de FA——— | ||||||||||
| Lauric | 10.48±3.04 | 13.47±4.59 | 13.64±5.35 | 12.61±5.41 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
| EPA | 0.16±0.43 | 0.25±0.63 | 0.31±0.77 | 0.58±0.69 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.24 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| Linolenic | 7.39±6.36 | 7.71±7.07 | 6.79±3.55 | 8.32±5.68 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.65 |
| DHA | 1.23±1.25 | 0.87±1.44 | 0.66±0.87 | 0.85±2.10 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.81 |
| Miristic | 1.69±0.72 | 1.42±0.48 | 1.39±0.68 | 1.38±0.70 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| Palmitoleic | 6.68±1.38 | 6.25±1.51 | 6.10±1.45 | 6.53±2.37 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| Linoleic | 10.31 | 8.58 | 8.48 | 6.80 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Palmitic | 8.83 | 6.74 | 7.00 | 6.05 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 0.64 | 0.51 |
| Oleic | 34.47±3.14 | 32.75±2.20 | 36.56±7.96 | 37.30±3.40 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.78 |
| Estearic | 18.71±7.88 | 21.94±6.20 | 19.02±5.37 | 19.54±5.25 | 0.92 | 0.37 | 0.81 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.88 |
| Saturated | 39.72±7.88 | 43.57±6.03 | 41.07±7.46 | 39.59±9.09 | 0.37 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 0.58 | 0.38 | 0.97 |
| Unsaturated | 60.27±7.88 | 56.42±6.03 | 58.92±7.46 | 60.41±9.09 | 0.37 | 0.75 | 0.97 | 0.58 | 0.38 | 0.97 |
Control diet (without supplementation of copper and selenium).
Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM).
Suplementation of copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM) and copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Control X Se.
Control X Cu.
Control X Se/Cu.
Se X Cu.
Se X Se/Cu.
Cu X Se/Cu.
Eicosapentaenoic acid.
Docosahexaenoic acid.
Means followed by different letters in rows differ (p<0.05).
Concentration of cholesterol and standard deviations in mg/dL, in cattle blood on the 0, 28th, 56th, 84th day receiving control diet (without supplementation of selenium and copper), copper (40 mg/kg of DM), selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), or selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM)
| Treatments | Cholesterol concentration (mg/dL) in blood at different times | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 0 | 28th day | 56th day | 84th day | |
| Control | 103.07±11.9 | 117.53±10.1 | 122.29±9.5 | 126.88±9.6 |
| Copper (Cu) | 101.86±10.4 | 107.08±8.4 | 122.38±13.5 | 107.07±5.3 |
| Selenium (Se) | 112.68±5.9 | 97.88±8.7 | 127.55±14.7 | 110.11±9.8 |
| Se/Cu | 106.96±13.6 | 103.5±5.8 | 121.34±10.1 | 113.65±7.9 |
Control diet (without supplementation of copper and selenium).
Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM).
Suplementation of copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Suplementation of selenium (2 mg/kg of DM) and copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
There was no effect of the supplementation of copper, selenium or selenium and copper in serum cholesterol (p>0.05).
Figure 1Concentration of cholesterol and standard deviations in mg per 100 grams of meat, in the Longissimus dorsi muscle of cattle receiving control diet (without supplementation of selenium and copper), copper (40 mg/kg of DM), selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), or selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Figure 2GSH and standard deviations, in μmol per gram of liver, of cattle receiving control diet (without supplementation of selenium and copper), copper (40 mg/kg of DM), selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), or selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Figure 3GSSG and standard deviations, in μmol per gram of liver, of cattle receiving control diet (without supplementation of selenium and copper), copper (40 mg/kg of DM), selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), or selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM).
Figure 4Relation between GSH and GSSG and standard deviations, in μmol per gram of liver, of cattle receiving control diet (without supplementation of selenium and copper), copper (40 mg/kg of DM), selenium (2 mg/kg of DM), or selenium (2 mg/kg of DM)/copper (40 mg/kg of DM).