| Literature DB >> 25049629 |
Yanjing Su1, Guoqi Zhao1, Zhenwu Wei1, Changjie Yan1, Sujiao Liu1.
Abstract
Rice straw is an important roughage resource for ruminants in many rice-producing countries. In this study, a rice brittle mutant (BM, mutation in OsCesA4, encoding cellulose synthase) and its wild type (WT) were employed to investigate the effects of a cellulose synthase gene mutation on rice straw morphological fractions, chemical composition, stem histological structure and in situ digestibility. The morphological fractions investigation showed that BM had a higher leaf sheath proportion (43.70% vs 38.21%, p<0.01) and a lower leaf blade proportion (25.21% vs 32.14%, p<0.01) than WT. Chemical composition analysis showed that BM rice straw was significantly (p<0.01) higher in CP (crude protein), hemicellulose and acid insoluble ash (AIA) contents, but lower in dry matter (DM), acid detergent fiber (ADFom) and cellulose contents when compared to WT. No significant difference (p>0.05) was detected in neutral detergent fiber (NDFom) and ADL contents for both strains. Histological structure observation indicated that BM stems had fewer sclerenchyma cells and a thinner sclerenchyma cell wall than WT. The results of in situ digestion showed that BM had higher DM, NDFom, cellulose and hemicellulose disappearance at 24 or 48 h of incubation (p<0.05). The effective digestibility of BM rice straw DM and NDFom was greater than that of WT (31.4% vs 26.7% for DM, 29.1% vs 24.3% for NDFom, p<0.05), but the rate of digestion of the slowly digested fraction of BM rice straw DM and NDF was decreased. These results indicated that the mutation in the cellulose synthase gene could improve the nutritive value of rice straw for ruminants.Entities:
Keywords: Cellulose Synthase; Histological Structure; In situ Digestibility; Rice Straw
Year: 2012 PMID: 25049629 PMCID: PMC4093100 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1The phenotype of brittle mutant (BM) and its wild type (WT).
Figure 2Morphological fraction proportions of brittle mutant (BM) and its wild type (WT) rice straw (* means p<0.05, ** means p<0.01).
Chemical composition of brittle mutant (BM) and its wild type (WT) rice straw (All values g/kg DM, except for DM content g/kg fresh straw)
| WT | BM | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter | 270.8a | 224.6b | 1.49 |
| Organic matter | 823.4a | 785.9b | 0.37 |
| Crude protein | 49.2b | 57.5a | 0.07 |
| NDFom | 811.8 | 795.5 | 2.17 |
| ADFom | 492.8a | 345.9b | 0.57 |
| Cellulose | 421.7a | 282.0b | 2.74 |
| Hemicellulose | 285.0b | 428.3a | 0.54 |
| ADL | 61.0 | 63.9 | 0.66 |
| AIA | 126.9b | 165.7a | 1.02 |
NDFom = Neutral detergent fiber on ash-free basis; ADFom = Acid detergent fiber on ash-free basis; ADL = Acid detergent lignin; AIA = Acid insoluble ash; DM = Dry matter. In the same row, values with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
Figure 3Transverse section and sclerenchyma cells of brittle mutant and its wild type stem. A, transverse section of brittle mutant stem (S = sclerenchyma; X = xylem; P = parenchyma, SEM×800); B, transverse section of wild type stem (SEM×800); C, sclerenchyma cell of brittle mutant stem (TEM×5,800); D, sclerenchyma cell of wild type stem (TEM×5,800).
In situ DM and NDFom disappearance, digestion constants and in situ digestibility of cell wall components for brittle mutant (BM) and its wild type (WT) rice straw
| Item | WT | BM | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disappearance (%) | |||
| 24 h | 29.1 | 29.3 | 1.41 |
| 48 h | 35.5b | 40.7a | 1.41 |
| Digestion constants | |||
| Potentially digestible fraction (%) | 40.7b | 52.9a | 2.12 |
| Readily digested fraction (%) | 3.6b | 8.3a | 1.06 |
| Slowly digested fraction (%) | 37.0b | 44.6a | 2.18 |
| Rate of digestion (%/h) | 4.0a | 2.8b | 0.47 |
| Effective digestibility (%) | 26.7b | 31.4a | 1.09 |
| Disappearance (%) | |||
| 24 h | 25.7b | 28.1a | 2.10 |
| 48 h | 33.6b | 39.7a | 2.45 |
| Digestion constants | |||
| Potentially digestible fraction (%) | 37.3b | 53.5a | 2.65 |
| Rate of digestion (%/h) | 4.5a | 3.0b | 0.44 |
| Lag time (h) | 0.8a | 0.3b | 0.15 |
| Effective digestibility (%) | 24.3b | 29.1a | 1.12 |
| Cellulose digestibility (%) | |||
| 24 h | 32.7b | 38.5a | 3.36 |
| 48 h | 44.1b | 54.2a | 2.75 |
| 72 h | 48.8b | 54.9a | 1.59 |
| Hemicellulose digestibility (%) | |||
| 24 h | 35.4b | 45.5a | 2.48 |
| 48 h | 46.2 | 50.9 | 2.41 |
| 72 h | 48.8b | 61.7a | 3.1 |
DM = Dry matter; NDFom = Neutral detergent fiber on ash-free basis. In the same row, values with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).
In situ digestion constants were calculated using the nonlinear model P = a+b(1-e−ct) of Ørskov and McDonald (1979).
Rate of digestion of slowly digested fraction.