| Literature DB >> 25049622 |
M Mahfuza Khatun1, Khondoker Moazzem Hossain2, S M Mahbubur Rahman2.
Abstract
In order to develop specific genetic markers and determine the genetic diversity of Bangladeshi native cattle (Pabna, Red Chittagong) and exotic breeds (Sahiwal), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was performed using 12 primers. Genomic DNA was extracted from 20 cattle (local and exotic) blood samples and extracted DNA was observed by gel electrophoresis. Among the random primers three were matched and found to be polymorphic. Genetic relations between cattle's were determined by RAPD polymorphisms from a total of 66.67%. Statistical analysis of the data, estimating the genetic distances between cattle and sketching the cluster trees were estimated by using MEGA 5.05 software. Comparatively highest genetic distance (0.834) was found between RCC-82 and SL-623. The lowest genetic distance (0.031) was observed between M-1222 and M-5730. The genetic diversity of Red Chittagong and Sahiwal cattle was relatively higher for a prescribed breed. Adequate diversity in performance and adaptability can be exploited from the study results for actual improvement accruing to conservation and development of indigenous cattle resources.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; Cattle; Genetic Distance; Polymorphism; RAPD-PCR
Year: 2012 PMID: 25049622 PMCID: PMC4093088 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
List of primers those showed polymorphism
| Primer no. | Sequence (5′-3′) | (G+C) Contents % |
|---|---|---|
| OPA-03 | TGCCTCGCACCA | 66.7 |
| OPA-07 | GGTGACGCAG | 70 |
| OPA-09 | GTTGCCACCC | 70 |
Figure 1RAPD profiles using primer OPA-03. The number corresponds to the serial of the genotypes; M is a 100 bp DNA ladder. ‘a’ and ‘b’ bands were monomorphic for all the experimental animals.
Figure 2RAPD profiles using primer OPA-07. On the gel ‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’ and ‘d’ bands were monomorphic for all experimental animals.
Figure 3RAPD profiles using primer OPA-09. ‘a’ is monomorphic for all experimental animals.
List of primers and their monomorphic and polymorphic bands
| Primer code | No. of bands | No. of monomorphic bands | Size of monomorphic bands (bp) | No. of polymorphic bands | Size of polymorphic bands (bp) | Polymorphism (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA-03 | 10 | 2 | 700-400 | 8 | 2,000-900 | 80 |
| OPA-07 | 7 | 4 | 1,000-700 | 3 | 600-400 | 42.85 |
| OPA-09 | 4 | 1 | 1,600 | 3 | 1,200-800 | 75 |
| Total = 3 | 21 | 7 | 33.33% | 14 | 66.67 |
Estimation of pair wise genetic distance between experimental cattle populations using Nei and Li’s (1979) equation
| Tag No. | RCC-173 | RCC-178 | RCC-691 | RCC-175 | RCC-609 | RCC-77 | RCC-78 | RCC-80 | RCC-81 | RCC-82 | SL-571 | SL-614 | SL-623 | SL-637 | SL-638 | M-1222 | LF-1414 | M-1893 | M-1980 | M-5730 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | *** | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 0.164 | *** | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 0.111 | 0.241 | *** | |||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 0.259 | 0.172 | 0.181 | *** | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 0.185 | 0.185 | 0.393 | 0.217 | *** | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | 0.185 | 0.185 | 0.304 | 0.111 | 0.200 | *** | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.217 | 0.111 | 0.133 | 0.696 | *** | |||||||||||||
| 8 | 0.259 | 0.214 | 0.304 | 0.214 | 0.032 | 0.125 | 0.259 | *** | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 0.185 | 0.214 | 0.533 | 0.214 | 0.133 | 0.307 | 0.333 | 0.666 | *** | |||||||||||
| 10 | 0.214 | 0.142 | 0.304 | 0.214 | 0.161 | 0.096 | 0.230 | 0.161 | 0.241 | *** | ||||||||||
| 11 | 0.071 | 0.103 | 0.333 | 0.285 | 0.803 | 0.096 | 0.153 | 0.360 | 0.172 | 0.032 | *** | |||||||||
| 12 | 0.111 | 0.142 | 0.185 | 0.172 | 0.133 | 0.033 | 0.142 | 0.133 | 0.066 | 0.200 | 0.333 | *** | ||||||||
| 13 | 0.111 | 0.142 | 0.185 | 0.714 | 0.133 | 0.200 | 0.172 | 0.133 | 0.344 | 0.834 | 0.230 | 0.200 | *** | |||||||
| 14 | 0.142 | 0.214 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.133 | 0.602 | 0.172 | 0.062 | 0.133 | 0.230 | 0.153 | 0.307 | 0.238 | *** | ||||||
| 15 | 0.071 | 0.172 | 0.143 | 0.640 | 0.200 | 0.230 | 0.241 | 0.043 | 0.333 | 0.386 | 0.214 | 0.346 | 0.230 | 0.814 | *** | |||||
| 16 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.142 | 0.142 | 0.096 | 0.386 | 0.066 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.161 | 0.172 | 0.161 | 0.230 | 0.083 | 0.200 | *** | ||||
| 17 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.161 | 0.384 | 0.200 | 0.142 | 0.103 | 0.307 | 0.060 | 0.307 | 0.214 | 0.172 | 0.200 | 0.360 | *** | |||
| 18 | 0.185 | 0.200 | 0.172 | 0.241 | 0.161 | 0.307 | 0.200 | 0.214 | 0.096 | 0.185 | 0.142 | 0.259 | 0.172 | 0.241 | 0.032 | 0.133 | 0.033 | *** | ||
| 19 | 0.103 | 0.572 | 0.148 | 0.066 | 0.217 | 0.185 | 0.200 | 0.103 | 0.062 | 0.538 | 0.111 | 0.230 | 0.083 | 0.066 | 0.066 | 0.133 | 0.142 | 0.035 | *** | |
| 20 | 0.172 | 0.040 | 0.103 | 0.133 | 0.062 | 0.153 | 0.032 | 0.160 | 0.111 | 0.259 | 0.200 | 0.259 | 0.214 | 0.200 | 0.161 | 0.031 | 0.062 | 0.142 | 0.214 | *** |
1,2,3,4,5…………….correspond to the number of the genotypes.
Figure 4The unweighted pair group method of analysis (UPGMA) dendrogram based on summarized data regarding differentiation among experimental cattle.