Literature DB >> 25048851

Efficacy and safety of fosfomycin plus imipenem as rescue therapy for complicated bacteremia and endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicenter clinical trial.

Ana del Río1, Oriol Gasch2, Asunción Moreno1, Carmen Peña3, Jordi Cuquet4, Dolors Soy1, Carlos A Mestres1, Cristina Suárez3, Juan C Pare1, Fe Tubau5, Cristina Garcia de la Mària1, Francesc Marco6, Jordi Carratalà3, José M Gatell1, Francisco Gudiol3, José M Miró1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for alternative rescue therapies in invasive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination of fosfomycin and imipenem as rescue therapy for MRSA infective endocarditis and complicated bacteremia.
METHODS: The trial was conducted between 2001 and 2010 in 3 Spanish hospitals. Adult patients with complicated MRSA bacteremia or endocarditis requiring rescue therapy were eligible for the study. Treatment with fosfomycin (2 g/6 hours IV) plus imipenem (1 g/6 hours IV) was started and monitored. The primary efficacy endpoints were percentage of sterile blood cultures at 72 hours and clinical success rate assessed at the test-of-cure visit (45 days after the end of therapy).
RESULTS: The combination was administered in 12 patients with endocarditis, 2 with vascular graft infection, and 2 with complicated bacteremia. Therapy had previously failed with vancomycin in 9 patients, daptomycin in 2, and sequential antibiotics in 5. Blood cultures were negative 72 hours after the first dose of the combination in all cases. The success rate was 69%, and only 1 of 5 deaths was related to the MRSA infection. Although the combination was safe in most patients (94%), a patient with liver cirrhosis died of multiorgan failure secondary to sodium overload. There were no episodes of breakthrough bacteremia or relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Fosfomycin plus imipenem was an effective and safe combination when used as rescue therapy for complicated MRSA bloodstream infections and deserves further clinical evaluation as initial therapy in these infections.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; bacteremia; fosfomycin; imipenem; infective endocarditis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25048851     DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  14 in total

Review 1.  Combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infective endocarditis due to enterococci.

Authors:  Sebastiano Leone; Silvana Noviello; Silvano Esposito
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Fosfomycin: Resurgence of an old companion.

Authors:  Sangeeta Sastry; Yohei Doi
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Mark Dayer; Lucieni O Conterno; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Cristina Elena Martí-Amarista
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 4.  Fosfomycin.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; George Samonis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Treatment Options for Carbapenem- Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.

Authors:  Moritz Fritzenwanker; Can Imirzalioglu; Susanne Herold; Florian M Wagenlehner; Klaus-Peter Zimmer; Trinad Chakraborty
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Fosfomycin plus β-Lactams as Synergistic Bactericidal Combinations for Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant and Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A del Río; C García-de-la-Mària; J M Entenza; O Gasch; Y Armero; D Soy; C A Mestres; J M Pericás; C Falces; S Ninot; M Almela; C Cervera; J M Gatell; A Moreno; P Moreillon; F Marco; J M Miró
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Adverse Events Associated with Fosfomycin Use: Review of the Literature and Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

Authors:  Dmitri Iarikov; Ronald Wassel; John Farley; Sumathi Nambiar
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2015-10-05

8.  Prevalence of Fosfomycin Resistance and Mutations in murA, glpT, and uhpT in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples.

Authors:  Zhuyingjie Fu; Ying Ma; Chunhui Chen; Yan Guo; Fupin Hu; Yang Liu; Xiaogang Xu; Minggui Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Fosfomycin as a potential therapy for the treatment of systemic infections: a population pharmacokinetic model to simulate multiple dosing regimens.

Authors:  Natalia V Ortiz Zacarías; Anneke C Dijkmans; Jacobus Burggraaf; Johan W Mouton; Erik B Wilms; Cees van Nieuwkoop; Daan J Touw; Ingrid M C Kamerling; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Intravenous Fosfomycin: An Assessment of Its Potential for Use in the Treatment of Systemic Infections in Canada.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Michael A Zhanel; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.