| Literature DB >> 25047656 |
Jianzhu Wang1, Binhe Gu2, Jianhui Huang3, Xingguo Han4, Guanghui Lin5, Fawen Zheng6, Yuncong Li7.
Abstract
Understanding the carbon sources supporting aquatic consumers in large rivers is essential for the protection of ecological integrity and for wildlife management. The relative importance of terrestrial and algal carbon to the aquatic food webs is still under intensive debate. The Yangtze River is the largest river in China and the third longest river in the world. The completion of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) in 2003 has significantly altered the hydrological regime of the middle Yangtze River, but its immediate impact on carbon sources supporting the river food web is unknown. In this study, potential production sources from riparian and the main river channel, and selected aquatic consumers (invertebrates and fish) at an upstream constricted-channel site (Luoqi), a midstream estuarine site (Huanghua) and a near dam limnetic site (Maoping) of the TGD were collected for stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) and IsoSource analyses. Model estimates indicated that terrestrial plants were the dominant carbon sources supporting the consumer taxa at the three study sites. Algal production appeared to play a supplemental role in supporting consumer production. The contribution from C4 plants was more important than that of C3 plants at the upstream site while C3 plants were the more important carbon source to the consumers at the two impacted sites (Huanghua and Maoping), particularly at the midstream site. There was no trend of increase in the contribution of autochthonous production from the upstream to the downstream sites as the flow rate decreased dramatically along the main river channel due to the construction of TGD. Our findings, along with recent studies in rivers and lakes, are contradictory to studies that demonstrate the importance of algal carbon in the aquatic food web. Differences in system geomorphology, hydrology, habitat heterogeneity, and land use may account for these contradictory findings reported in various studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25047656 PMCID: PMC4105416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the Three Gorges Dam area showing the three study sites and major cities.
Figure 2Monthly water discharge (solid line) and sand flux (dash line) at the Luoqi site on the upper Yangtze River in 2004.
Figure 3Plots of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope value means and standard deviation error bars (δ13C versus δ15N) of production sources and consumer assemblages at each study site.
Data from the two sampling events were pooled. Symbol codes are as follows: C3 = C3 plants, C4 = C4 plants, FPOM = Fine particulate organic matter, EA = epiphytic algae, FA = Filamentous algae, 1 = zooplankton, 2 = stream crab, 3 = mixed snails, 4 = river shrimp, 5 = common carp, 6 = crucian carp, 7 = bronze gudgeon, 8 = yellow catfish, 9 = Chinese minnow, 10 = Chinese perch.
Averages of selected environmental variables determined before (1999–2003) and after (2004–2005) the Three Gorge Dam construction at river sections near the three study sites along Yangtze River.
| Variable | Upstream | Midstream | Downstream | |||
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| Flow rate, m s−1 | 3.20 | 1.75 | 1.29 | 0.36 | 1.45 | 0.17 |
| Chl a, mg m−3 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 10.2 | 14.7 | 5.2 | 15 |
| TP, mg L−1 | 0.194 | 0.216 | 0.105 | 0.145 | 0.140 | 0.138 |
| TN, mg L−1 | 2.005 | 1.665 | 1.559 | 1.494 | 1.260 | 1.357 |
| pH, SU | 7.9 | 7.3 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| DO, mg L−1 | 7.63 | 7.28 | 8.39 | 8.04 | 8.11 | 8.97 |
| Conductivity, µs cm−1 | 232 | 248 | 267 | 372 | 268 | 279 |
| COD, mg L−1 | 12.95 | 13.64 | 10.12 | 10.95 | 11.18 | 16.18 |
| BOD, mg L−1 | 2.29 | 1.68 | 2.07 | 1.13 | 1.43 | 1.77 |
Data are taken from various reports [30], [52], [55], [56].
1st and 99th percentiles of the contribution of the five production sources to the 10 consumers taxa in the upstream (Luoqi) of the Three Gorges Dam.
| Taxa | C3 plants | C4 plants | FPOM | EA | FA |
| Zooplankton | 41–67 | 19–26 | 0–39 | 0–13 | 0–7 |
| Stream Crab | 0–5 | 39–55 | 0–8 | 13–55 | 0–31 |
| Mixed snails | <0.1–43 | 20–32 | 0–70 | 0–32 | 0–24 |
| River shrimp | 0–41 | 21–34 | 0–66 | 0–33 | 0–25 |
| Common carp | 0–35 | 24–38 | 0–57 | 0–36 | 0–27 |
| Crucian carp | 0–41 | 21–34 | 0–67 | 0–33 | 0–25 |
| Bronze gudgeon | <0.1–47 | 18–30 | 0–75 | 0–30 | 0–23 |
| Yellow catfish | <0.1–45 | 19–31 | 0–73 | 0–31 | 0–23 |
| Chinese minnow | 15–58 | 13–23 | 0–70 | 0–25 | 0–19 |
| Chinese perch | <0.1–47 | 18–30 | 0–76 | 0–30 | 0–22 |
Note: Percentiles were estimated using a five-source dual isotope mixing model in the IsoSource program (Philips and Gregg 2003). FPOM: Fine particulate organic matter; EA: Epiphytic algae; FA: Filamentous algae.
1st and 99th percentiles of the contribution of the five production sources to the ten consumer taxa at the midstream (Huanghua) site of the Three Gorges Dam.
| Taxa | C3 plants | C4 plants | FPOM | EA | FA |
| Zooplankton | 46–59 | 23–32 | 0–25 | 0–22 | 0–7 |
| Stream crab | 38–50 | 34–42 | 0–23 | 0–20 | 0–7 |
| Mixed snails | 49–63 | 19–28 | 0–24 | 0–23 | 0–8 |
| River shrimp | 39–51 | 33–41 | 0–22 | 0–20 | 0–7 |
| Common carp | 44–57 | 26–35 | 0–20 | 0–21 | 0–7 |
| Crucian carp | 41–54 | 30–38 | 0–23 | 0–21 | 0–7 |
| Bronze gudgeon | 42–54 | 29–37 | 0–24 | 0–21 | 0–7 |
| Yellow catfish | 41–54 | 30–38 | 0–23 | 0–21 | 0–7 |
| Chinese minnow | 46–59 | 23–32 | 0–25 | 0–22 | 0–7 |
| Chinese perch | 53–67 | 13–23 | 0–27 | 0–24 | 0–8 |
Note: Same as in Table 2.
1st and 99th percentiles of the contribution of the five production sources to the ten consumer taxa at the limnetic zone (Maoping) site of the Three Gorges Dam.
| Taxa | C3 plants | C4 plants | FPOM | EA | FA |
| Zooplankton | 22–50 | 12–26 | 0–61 | 0–36 | 0–22 |
| Stream crab | 0–16 | 33–51 | 0–37 | 0–48 | 0–30 |
| Mixed snails | 12–42 | 17–32 | 0–66 | 0–38 | 0–24 |
| River shrimp | 16–45 | 15–30 | 0–64 | 0–37 | 0–23 |
| Common carp | 12–42 | 17–32 | 0–66 | 0–38 | 0–24 |
| Crucian carp | 15–42 | 17–32 | 0–66 | 0–38 | 0–24 |
| Bronze gudgeon | 23–50 | 12–26 | 0–61 | 0–35 | 0–22 |
| Yellow catfish | 23–50 | 12–25 | 0–61 | 0–35 | 0–22 |
| Chinese minnow | 6–37 | 20–35 | 0–69 | 0–40 | 0–25 |
| Chinese perch | 21–48 | 13–27 | 0–62 | 0–36 | 0–22 |
Note: Same as in Table 2.
Averages of 1st and 99th percentile values of each production source contribution to the 10 consumer taxa in the three study sites calculated from the IsoSource program.
| Site | C3 plants | C4 plants | FPOM | EA | FA |
| Luoqi | 6–43 | 21–33 | 0–60 | 1–32 | 0–21 |
| Huanghua | 44–57 | 26–35 | 0–24 | 0–22 | 0–7 |
| Maoping | 15–42 | 17–32 | 0–61 | 0–38 | 0–24 |
Note: Same as in Table 2.