Literature DB >> 25047472

Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database.

Jeffrey Landercasper1, Eric Whitacre, Amy C Degnim, Mohammed Al-Hamadani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is marked variability of re-excision rates after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer. Reasons for re-excision and variability across surgeons have not been well documented. We hypothesized the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery(SM) Program can identify reasons for re-excision.
METHODS: Data from January 1 to 7 November 2013 were evaluated in the ASBrS Mastery(SM) Program to determine re-excision lumpectomy rate (RELR). On 1 June 2013, a tool to track reasons for re-excision was developed. Variation in re-excision rate by surgeon and patient characteristics was performed by Chi square test and Fisher's test for univariate analysis, then logistic regression with backwards elimination method for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: For 6,725 patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for cancer, 328 surgeons reported 1,451 (21.6 %) patients had one or more re-excisions. The most common reasons for re-excision were ink positive margins in 783 (49.7 %), margin <1 mm (34.3 %), and margin 1-2 mm (7.2 %). By multivariate analysis, re-excision rates were lower in patients aged less than 35 years, with White (non-) Hispanic ethnicity, and, among surgeons in solo practice, more years in practice and higher-volume practice.
CONCLUSION: Half of re-excisions after initial lumpectomy were performed for margins that are positive. Most of the remainder were for negative close (<1-2 mm) margins. This information corroborates surgeon survey data regarding reasons for re-excision and provides proof of concept the Mastery(SM) Program can capture surgical outcome data in real time, providing opportunity and a method for future performance improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25047472     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3905-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  31 in total

1.  The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Use of a handheld terahertz pulsed imaging device to differentiate benign and malignant breast tissue.

Authors:  Maarten R Grootendorst; Anthony J Fitzgerald; Susan G Brouwer de Koning; Aida Santaolalla; Alessia Portieri; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Matthew R Young; Julie Owen; Massi Cariati; Michael Pepper; Vincent P Wallace; Sarah E Pinder; Arnie Purushotham
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Breast tissue stiffness estimation for surgical guidance using gravity-induced excitation.

Authors:  Rebekah H Griesenauer; Jared A Weis; Lori R Arlinghaus; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Pilot study of freshly excised breast tissue response in the 300-600 GHz range.

Authors:  Quentin Cassar; Amel Al-Ibadi; Laven Mavarani; Philipp Hillger; Janusz Grzyb; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Thomas Zimmer; Ullrich R Pfeiffer; Jean-Paul Guillet; Patrick Mounaix
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.

Authors:  Maureen P McEvoy; Jeffrey Landercasper; Himani R Naik; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

6.  Toward quantitative quasistatic elastography with a gravity-induced deformation source for image-guided breast surgery.

Authors:  Rebekah H Griesenauer; Jared A Weis; Lori R Arlinghaus; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-08

7.  Intraoperative Pathologic Margin Analysis and Re-Excision to Minimize Reoperation for Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Racz; Amy E Glasgow; Gary L Keeney; Amy C Degnim; Tina J Hieken; James W Jakub; John C Cheville; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI.

Authors:  Rebekah H Conley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Jared A Weis; Thomas S Pheiffer; Lori R Arlinghaus; Thomas E Yankeelov; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Reoperation costs in attempted breast-conserving surgery: a decision analysis.

Authors:  R E Pataky; C R Baliski
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Reoperations after primary breast conserving surgery in women with invasive breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J M Escribà; L Esteban; J Gálvez; M J Pla; A Melià; M Gil-Gil; R Clèries; L Pareja; X Sanz; M Bustins; J M Borrás; J Ribes
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.