| Literature DB >> 25045658 |
Camilla Luzzago1, Stefania Lauzi1, Erika Ebranati2, Monica Giammarioli3, Ana Moreno4, Vincenza Cannella5, Loretta Masoero6, Elena Canelli4, Annalisa Guercio5, Claudio Caruso6, Massimo Ciccozzi7, Gian Mario De Mia3, Pier Luigi Acutis6, Gianguglielmo Zehender2, Simone Peletto6.
Abstract
Genetic typing of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) has distinguished BVDV-1 and BVDV-2 species and an emerging putative third species (HoBi-like virus), recently detected in southern Italy, signaling the occurrence of natural infection in Europe. Recognizing the need to update the data on BVDV genetic variability in Italy for mounting local and European alerts, a wide collection of 5' UTR sequences (n = 371) was selected to identify the frequency of genotypes and subtypes at the herd level. BVDV-1 had the highest frequency, followed by sporadic BVDV-2. No novel HoBi-like viruses were identified. Four distribution patterns of BVDV-1 subtypes were observed: highly prevalent subtypes with a wide temporal-spatial distribution (1b and 1e), low prevalent subtypes with a widespread geographic distribution (1a, 1d, 1g, 1h, and 1k) or a restricted geographic distribution (1f), and sporadic subtypes detected only in single herds (1c, 1j, and 1l). BVDV-1c, k, and l are reported for the first time in Italy. A unique genetic variant was detected in the majority of herds, but cocirculation of genetic variants was also observed. Northern Italy ranked first for BVDV introduction, prevalence, and dispersion. Nevertheless, the presence of sporadic variants in other restricted areas suggests the risk of different routes of BVDV introduction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25045658 PMCID: PMC4090534 DOI: 10.1155/2014/147145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree based on the 5′-UTR of selected Italian sequences representative of all BVDV genotypes and subtypes detected between 1995 and 2013 and reference BVDV-1, BVDV-2, and HoBi-like strains. Molecular evolutionary genetics analyses were performed with MEGA5 using the NJ method. Distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter model. Bootstrap values > 70% are shown. Published sequences and references are identified by GenBank accession number (available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). The symbol “◆” indicates selected novel nucleotide sequences of BVDV Italian strains.
Frequency of BVDV genotypes and subtypes in Italy.
| Genotype/subtype | Total sequences number (%) | Herd∗ number (%) | Years | Geographic origin∗∗ | Published/total sequences ( | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVDV-1a | 9 (2.4) | 9 (3.4) | 2000–2009 | NCI | 3/9 | [ |
| BVDV-1b | 149 (40.2) | 115 (43.9) | 1995–2013 | NCSI | 52/149 | [ |
| BVDV-1c | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | 2010 | S | 0/1 | Not published |
| BVDV-1d | 20 (5.4) | 16 (6.1) | 1995–2010 | NCS | 5/20 | [ |
| BVDV-1e | 126 (34) | 72 (27.5) | 1996–2013 | NCSI | 22/126 | [ |
| BVDV-1f | 28 (7.5) | 17 (6.5) | 1999–2012 | N | 1/28 | [ |
| BVDV-1g | 4 (1.1) | 4 (1.5) | 2002–2010 | NS | 1/4 | [ |
| BVDV-1h | 15 (4.0) | 14 (5.3) | 1996–2011 | NCI | 3/15 | [ |
| BVDV-1j | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | 1995 | N | 1/1 | [ |
| BVDV-1k | 3 (0.8) | 3 (1.1) | 2001–2011 | NS | 0/3 | Not published |
| BVDV-1l | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | 2007 | C | 0/1 | Not published |
| BVDV-2 | 10 (2.7) | 7 (2.7) | 1995–2004 | NS | 7/10 | [ |
| HoBi-like | 4 (1.1) | 2 (0.8) | 2007–2011 | S | 4/4 | [ |
*Herds with different BVDV genotypes or subtypes are counted for each virus type.
**N: northern Italy, C: central Italy, S: southern Italy, and I: Islands.
Figure 2Frequency of BVDV genotypes and subtypes in the four Italian macroareas.
Sequence similarity (%) of pairwise distances within herds with ≥2 animals/sequences belonging to the same BVDV-1 subtypes.
| Sequence similarity (%) | BVDV-1 subtype | Herd identification | Sequences in each herd ( | Temporal range of collection (months) | Herd production system∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 1b | RG7 | 2 | 2 | nd |
| 100 | 1b | BG23 | 2 | 12a | D |
| 100 | 1b | PD3 | 2 | 12a | nd |
| 100 | 1b | CO2 | 2 | 1b | D |
| 100 | 1b | CN29 | 2 | 1b | nd |
| 100 | 1b | AT3 | 2 | 1b | B |
| 100 | 1b | CN8 | 2 | 1 | B |
| 100 | 1b | TO3 | 2 | 1b | D |
| 100 | 1b | TO17 | 3 | 13 | M |
| 100 | 1d | CN20 | 2 | 1b | B |
| 100 | 1e | RG2 | 2 | 8 | nd |
| 100 | 1e | CR22 | 2 | 1b | D |
| 100 | 1e | AL2 | 2 | 1b | M |
| 100 | 1e | CN24 | 2 | 6 | D |
| 100 | 1e | TO8 | 5 | 1b | D |
| 100 | 1e | TO14 | 8 | 12 | B |
| 100 | 1e | TO19 | 7 | 1b | D |
| 100 | 1f | CN2 | 3 | 14 | M |
| 100 | 1h | NO1 | 2 | 1 | D |
| 99.4–100 | 1e | VI7 | 4 | 12a | nd |
| 99.4 | 1b | RG6 | 2 | 1b | nd |
| 99.4 | 1b | TO23 | 2 | 3 | D |
| 99.4 | 1d | CN19 | 2 | 1b | D |
| 99.4 | 1f | AT2 | 2 | 1b | B |
| 98.8–100 | 1b | LO2 | 4 | 3 | D |
| 98.8–100 | 1f | CN1 | 7 | 14 | D |
| 98.8 | 1f | CN5 | 2 | 2 | D |
| 98.2–100 | 1b | RG4 | 4 | 2 | nd |
| 98.2 | 1b | RM1 | 2 | 12a | D |
| 98.2 | 1b | TR1 | 2 | 12a | B |
| 97.1 | 1b | CR13 | 2 | 12a | D |
| 96.5 | 1b | RM2 | 2 | 12a | D |
| 94.7–100 | 1b | LC1 | 5 | 129 | D |
| 93.6–100 | 1e | CN16 | 3 | 10 | B |
| 93–100 | 1b | RG3 | 3 | 3 | nd |
| 90.1 | 1e | CN17 | 2 | 13 | D |
| 88.9–100 | 1e | TO12 | 7 | 19 | M |
*D: dairy herd, B: beef herd, M: mixed farm, and nd: not determined.
aData available only for year of sample collection.
bSamples collected on the same day.
Herds with ≥2 animals/sequences belonging to different genotypes and subtypes.
| Genotype | Herd identification | Total sequences number | Temporal range of collection (months) | Herd production system∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVDV-1b, 1e | TO9 | 2 | 1∗∗ | D |
| BVDV-1b, 1e | CN7 | 20 | 1 | B |
| BVDV-1b, 1f | CN6 | 2 | 3 | B |
| BVDV-1b, 1k | CS2 | 3 | 12 | D |
| BVDV-1b, 2 | BS33 | 2 | 1∗∗ | D |
| BVDV-1d, 1e | NO2 | 3 | 21 | M |
| BVDV-1d, 1e | MN4 | 2 | 1∗∗ | D |
| BVDV-1e, 1f | CN3 | 5 | 1∗∗ | D |
| BVDV-1e, 1h | LC2 | 2 | 19 | D |
*D: dairy herd, B: beef herd, and M: mixed farm.
**Samples collected on the same day.