| Literature DB >> 25045387 |
Geon-Mok Lee1, Eun-Yong Lee2, Jong-Hyun Han3, Kyong-Ha Cho1, Se-Rin Kang1, Sang-Hoon Yoon1.
Abstract
Background. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a disease with increasing prevalence due to prolongation of average life span. Despite various treatment methods, many limitations remain unsolved. Objective. We are reporting cases of patients who have been treated with Wonli Acupuncture, a method of treating LSS by directly approaching the intervertebral foramen and interlaminar space with acupuncture needles different from those used in original acupuncture. Methods. A total of 82 patients with LSS were treated with Wonli Acupuncture, and out of those, 47 patients without exclusion criteria were selected for the following research. We compared the pretreatment VAS and ODI scores based on 1-year follow-up measurements. Results. The ODI value dropped by 15.3 ± 24.8 on average (from 35.2 ± 19.9 at the baseline to 19.8 ± 20.6 at the reading) (P < 0.01) and the average VAS also dropped by 19.2 ± 37.2 (from 60.7 ± 23.1 at baseline to 41.5 ± 31.9 at the reading) (P < 0.01). Conclusions. Wonli Acupuncture was found to have clinical efficacy for lumbar spinal stenosis.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25045387 PMCID: PMC4090502 DOI: 10.1155/2014/212098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Therapy by the STRICTA recommendation [21].
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| (1) Acupuncture rationale | (1a) Style of acupuncture: Wonli Acupuncture procedure |
| (1b) Reasoning for therapy provided, based on historical context, literature sources, and/or consensus methods, with appropriate references: we incised the conglutinated part from the fiberized lesion to promote injury recovery, tissue proliferation, and fortification [ | |
| (1c) Extent to which therapy was varied: | |
|
| |
| (2) Details of needling | (2a) Number of acupuncture needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range where relevant): 4 to 12 per session |
| (2b) Names (or location if no standard name) of points used (uni/bilateral): zygapophyseal joint (both sides), the tip of the transverse process (both sides) | |
| (2c) Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement or on a particular tissue level: 4~8 cm deep (acupuncture for anatomical structure) | |
| (2d) Response sought: pain and twinge (nerve stimulation) | |
| (2e) Needle stimulation: manual | |
| (2f) Needle retention time: postprocedure removal | |
| (2g) Needle type: | |
|
| |
| (3) Therapy regimen | (3a) Number of therapy sessions: 1 to 4 sessions |
| (3b) Frequency and duration of therapy sessions: once (or more for patients who report continued pain). | |
|
| |
| (4) Other components of therapy | (4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group: after Wonli Acupuncture procedure all patients were admitted for 3 days of observation: |
| (4b) Setting and context of therapy, including instructions to practitioners and information and explanations to patients: | |
|
| |
| (5) Practitioner background | (5) Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional affiliation, years in acupuncture practice, and other relevant experience): |
|
| |
| (6) Control or comparison interventions | (6a) Rationale for control or comparison intervention in the context of research question, with sources that justify this choice: no comparison group |
| (6b) Precise description of the control or comparison interventions; if sham acupuncture or any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for items 1 to 3 above: no comparison group. | |
Subject demographics.
| Patients ( | 47 |
| Age (years) | 57.9 ± 10.0 |
| Gender (M/F) | 20/27 |
| Duration of symptom (months) | 45.4 ± 86.0 |
| Oswestry disability index (%) | 35.2 ± 19.9 |
| Visual analogue scale | 60.7 ± 23.1 |
|
| |
| Involved level | |
| L4-5 ( | 45 (95.7%) |
| L3-4 ( | 27 (57.4%) |
| L5-S1 ( | 26 (55.3%) |
|
| |
| Radicular pain | |
| Unilateral ( | 39 (83%) |
| Bilateral | 6 (12.8%) |
| Only back pain | 2 (4.4%) |
Change of VAS and ODI scale of 1 year after intervension.
| Baseline | Follow-up (1 year) | |
|---|---|---|
| ODI | 35.2 ± 19.9 | 19.8 ± 20.6∗∗ |
| VAS | 60.7 ± 23.1 | 41.5 ± 31.9∗∗ |
| >50% improvement ODI | 24/47 (51.1%) | |
| >50% improvement VAS | 18/47 (38.3%) |
**P < 0.01.
Figure 9Coefficient of quartile deviation of pre- and post-ODI; pre- and post-VAS.
Figure 1Approach points A and B.
Figure 2Acupuncture needle 1.
Figure 3Acupuncture needle 2.
Figure 4Acupuncture needle 3.
Figure 5Acupuncture needle 4.
Figure 6Acupoint of acupuncture needle 3.
Figure 7Acupoint of acupuncture needle 4.
Figure 8Flow chart.