Literature DB >> 2504377

Local bone mineral response to brief exercise that stresses the skeleton.

M C Beverly1, T A Rider, M J Evans, R Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare grip strength and bone mineral content in the forearm in women and to test the effects on bone mineral content of short periods of exercise that stresses the skeleton.
DESIGN: Assessment of both wrists in 69 volunteers and of the non-fractured wrist in 30 patients followed by an exercise regimen entailing squeezing a tennis ball as hard as possible for 30 seconds each day for six weeks.
SETTING: Old people's homes and outpatient departments of Hammersmith and Northampton general hospitals. PATIENTS: 99 Women, of whom 69 were volunteers and 30 had a fractured forearm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Grip strength and bone mineral content after six weeks and at six months after the exercises had stopped.
RESULTS: The bone mineral content of the women's forearms was measured with a densitometer and the grip strength with a semi-inflated bag connected to an anaeroid barometer. Measurements before exercise showed that the two variables correlated closely, irrespective of age, and that there were significant differences in both between the dominant and non-dominant arms of the volunteers. After six weeks of exercise there was a mean increase in grip strength of 14.5% (95% confidence interval 9.9 to 19.2%) and in bone mineral content of 3.4% (1.4 to 5.3%) in the stressed forearms of the 77 women who attended for examination. After six months without exercise the improvements in the 33 women who attended for follow up had reversed. Women who had had a fractured forearm (n = 13), however, had continued to gain grip strength and bone mineral content in the arm that had not been injured.
CONCLUSIONS: Grip strength in the forearm is a good indicator of bone mineral content. Both variables may be increased by brief periods of stressful exercise. If this principle can be applied to the whole skeleton it may provide a means of reversing osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2504377      PMCID: PMC1836936          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6693.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Bone mineral content in the forearm measured by photon absorptiometry. Principles and reliability.

Authors:  C Christiansen; P Rödbro; H Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Does exercise prevent osteoporosis?

Authors:  J E Block; R Smith; D Black; H K Genant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effect of two randomised exercise programmes on bone mass of healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R Chow; J E Harrison; C Notarius
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-12-05

4.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Effect of intense physical activity on the bone-mineral content in the lower limbs of young adults.

Authors:  J Y Margulies; A Simkin; I Leichter; A Bivas; R Steinberg; M Giladi; M Stein; H Kashtan; C Milgrom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Bone mineral content of amenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes.

Authors:  B L Drinkwater; K Nilson; C H Chesnut; W J Bremner; S Shainholtz; M B Southworth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Physical activity, muscle strength, and calcium intake in fracture of the proximal femur in Britain.

Authors:  C Cooper; D J Barker; C Wickham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-12-03

Review 8.  Physical exercise in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  D Schapira
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 18.000

  8 in total
  31 in total

1.  Comparison between estimates of hand volume and hand strengths with sex and age with and without anthropometric data in healthy working people.

Authors:  N Chau; D Pétry; E Bourgkard; P Huguenin; E Remy; J M André
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Is there a role for exercise in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures?

Authors:  O M Rutherford
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Compliance bias as a factor in longitudinal exercise research. Osteoporosis.

Authors:  N B Oldridge
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Measuring muscle strength of the upper extremity.

Authors:  A Pittler
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Effects of physical activity on some components of the skeletal system.

Authors:  N Maffulli; J B King
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Determinants of forearm bone density in premenopausal women: a study in one general practice.

Authors:  M L Cox; S A Khan; D W Gau; S A Cox; H M Hodkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Impact of bone mineral measurements on osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Fogelman; A Rodin; G Blake
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

Review 8.  The epidemiology of hip fracture in Asia: an update.

Authors:  E M Lau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of physical activity for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A Bérard; G Bravo; P Gauthier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Osteoporosis and exercise.

Authors:  J A Todd; R J Robinson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.