Literature DB >> 25042872

Variable selection in subdistribution hazard frailty models with competing risks data.

Il Do Ha1, Minjung Lee, Seungyoung Oh, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, Richard Sylvester, Youngjo Lee.   

Abstract

The proportional subdistribution hazards model (i.e. Fine-Gray model) has been widely used for analyzing univariate competing risks data. Recently, this model has been extended to clustered competing risks data via frailty. To the best of our knowledge, however, there has been no literature on variable selection method for such competing risks frailty models. In this paper, we propose a simple but unified procedure via a penalized h-likelihood (HL) for variable selection of fixed effects in a general class of subdistribution hazard frailty models, in which random effects may be shared or correlated. We consider three penalty functions, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) and HL, in our variable selection procedure. We show that the proposed method can be easily implemented using a slight modification to existing h-likelihood estimation approaches. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed procedure using the HL penalty performs well, providing a higher probability of choosing the true model than LASSO and SCAD methods without losing prediction accuracy. The usefulness of the new method is illustrated using two actual datasets from multi-center clinical trials.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competing risks; frailty models; h-likelihood penalty function; penalized h-likelihood; subdistribution hazard; variable selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25042872      PMCID: PMC4190010          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  23 in total

1.  Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood.

Authors:  S Ripatti; J Palmgren
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Model selection for multi-component frailty models.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Youngjo Lee; Gilbert MacKenzie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Variable selection for multivariate failure time data.

Authors:  Jianwen Cai; Jianqing Fan; Runze Li; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Variable Selection using MM Algorithms.

Authors:  David R Hunter; Runze Li
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion.

Authors:  Yiyun Zhang; Runze Li; Chih-Ling Tsai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Model selection in competing risks regression.

Authors:  Deborah Kuk; Ravi Varadhan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A Selective Overview of Variable Selection in High Dimensional Feature Space.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Jinchi Lv
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.261

9.  Estimating and testing for center effects in competing risks.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Christian Boudreau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Frailty-based competing risks model for multivariate survival data.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Li Hsu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  9 in total

1.  Group and within-group variable selection for competing risks data.

Authors:  Kwang Woo Ahn; Anjishnu Banerjee; Natasha Sahr; Soyoung Kim
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Penalized variable selection in competing risks regression.

Authors:  Zhixuan Fu; Chirag R Parikh; Bingqing Zhou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Bias Due to Confounders for the Exposure-Competing Risk Relationship.

Authors:  Catherine R Lesko; Bryan Lau
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Risk Factor Identification in Heterogeneous Disease Progression with L1-Regularized Multi-state Models.

Authors:  Xuan Dang; Shuai Huang; Xiaoning Qian
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2021-01-04

5.  Scalable Algorithms for Large Competing Risks Data.

Authors:  Eric S Kawaguchi; Jenny I Shen; Marc A Suchard; Gang Li
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.884

6.  On correlation rank screening for ultra-high dimensional competing risks data.

Authors:  Xiaolin Chen; Chenguang Li; Tao Zhang; Zhenlong Gao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 1.416

7.  Pretransplant survival of patients with end-stage heart failure under competing risks.

Authors:  Kevin B Smith; Tseeye Odugba Potters; Gabriel Lopez Zenarosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Prognostic value of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Dongjun Dai; Yanmei Wang; Liyuan Zhu; Hongchuan Jin; Xian Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Competing Risk Analyses of Medullary Carcinoma of Breast in Comparison to Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dongjun Dai; Rongkai Shi; Zhuo Wang; Yiming Zhong; Vivian Y Shin; Hongchuan Jin; Xian Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.