Literature DB >> 25042586

Crossmodal comparisons of signal components allow for relative-distance assessment.

Wouter Halfwerk1, Rachel A Page2, Ryan C Taylor3, Preston S Wilson4, Michael J Ryan5.   

Abstract

Animals have multiple senses through which they detect their surroundings and often integrate sensory information across different modalities to generate perceptions. Animal communication, likewise, often consists of signals containing stimuli processed by different senses. Stimuli with different physical forms (i.e., from different sensory modalities) travel at different speeds. As a consequence, multimodal stimuli simultaneously emitted at a source can arrive at a receiver at different times. Such differences in arrival time can provide unique information about the distance to the source. Male túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) call from ponds to attract females and to repel males. Production of the sound incidentally creates ripples on the water surface, providing a multimodal cue. We tested whether male frogs attend to distance-dependent cues created by a calling rival and whether their response depends on crossmodal comparisons. In a first experiment, we showed distance-dependent changes in vocal behavior: males responded more strongly with decreasing distance to a mimicked rival. In a second experiment, we showed that males can discriminate between relatively near and far rivals by using a combination of unimodal cues, specifically amplitude changes of sound and water waves, as well as crossmodal differences in arrival time. Our data reveal that animals can compare the arrival time of simultaneously emitted multimodal cues to obtain information on relative distance to a source. We speculate that communicative benefits from crossmodal comparison may have been an important driver of the evolution of elaborate multimodal displays.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25042586     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  A systems approach to animal communication.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets; Andrew B Barron; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Mark E Hauber; Paul H Mason; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reality and illusion: the assessment of angular separation of multi-modal signallers in a duetting bird.

Authors:  Paweł Ręk; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.

Authors:  F Rhebergen; R C Taylor; M J Ryan; R A Page; W Halfwerk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Conspecific odor cues induce different vocal responses in serrate-legged small treefrogs, but only in the absence of acoustic signals.

Authors:  Ke Deng; Ya Zhou; Qiao-Ling He; Bi-Cheng Zhu; Tong-Liang Wang; Ji-Chao Wang; Jian-Guo Cui
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Sometimes noise is beneficial: stream noise informs vocal communication in the little torrent frog Amolops torrentis.

Authors:  Longhui Zhao; Bicheng Zhu; Jichao Wang; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  J Ethol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.270

7.  Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs.

Authors:  Longhui Zhao; Jichao Wang; Haodi Zhang; Tongliang Wang; Yue Yang; Yezhong Tang; Wouter Halfwerk; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Training-induced plasticity enables visualizing sounds with a visual-to-auditory conversion device.

Authors:  Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau; Gabriel Arnold; Malika Auvray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Aggressive Bimodal Communication in Domestic Dogs, Canis familiaris.

Authors:  Éloïse C Déaux; Jennifer A Clarke; Isabelle Charrier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sophisticated Communication in the Brazilian Torrent Frog Hylodes japi.

Authors:  Fábio P de Sá; Juliana Zina; Célio F B Haddad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.