Literature DB >> 25041766

Individual and species-specific traits explain niche size and functional role in spiders as generalist predators.

Dirk Sanders1,2, Esther Vogel1, Eva Knop1.   

Abstract

The function of a predator within a community is greatly based on its trophic niche, that is the number and the strength of feeding links. In generalist predators, which feed on a wide range of prey, the size and position of the trophic niche is likely determined by traits such as hunting mode, the stratum they occur in, their body size and age. We used stable isotope analyses ((13)C and (15)N) to measure the trophic niche size of nine spider species within a forest hedge community and tested for species traits and individual traits that influence stable isotope enrichment, niche size and resource use. The spiders Enoplognatha, Philodromus, Floronia, and Heliophanus had large isotopic niches, which correspond to a more generalistic feeding behaviour. In contrast, Araneus, Metellina and Agelena, as top predators in the system, had rather narrow niches. We found a negative correlation between trophic position and niche size. Differences in trophic position in spiders were explained by body size, hunting modes and stratum, while niche size was influenced by hunting mode. In Philodromus, the size of the trophic niche increased significantly with age. Fitting spiders to functional groups according to their mean body size, hunting mode and their habitat domain resulted in largely separated niches, which indicates that these traits are meaningful for separating functional entities in spiders. Functional groups based on habitat domain (stratum) caught the essential functional differences between the species with species higher up in the vegetation feeding on flying insects and herb and ground species also preying on forest floor decomposers. Interestingly, we found a gradient from large species using a higher habitat domain and having a smaller niche to smaller species foraging closer to the ground and having a larger niche. This shows that even within generalist predators, such as spiders, there is a gradient of specialism that can be predicted by functional traits.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2014 British Ecological Society.

Keywords:  SIBER; ecosystem function; generalist predators; niche width; traits

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041766     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  Body size mediates the relationship between spider (Arachnida: Araneae) assemblage composition and prey consumption rate: results of a mesocosm experiment in the Yukon, Canada.

Authors:  Shaun Turney; Chris M Buddle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Different hunting strategies of generalist predators result in functional differences.

Authors:  Radek Michalko; Stano Pekár
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Trophic overlap between fish and riparian spiders: potential impacts of an invasive fish on terrestrial consumers.

Authors:  Michelle C Jackson; Darragh J Woodford; Terence A Bellingan; Olaf L F Weyl; Michael J Potgieter; Nick A Rivers-Moore; Bruce R Ellender; Hermina E Fourie; Christian T Chimimba
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  Predator and prey functional traits: understanding the adaptive machinery driving predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Oswald Schmitz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Effect of habitat degradation on competition, carrying capacity, and species assemblage stability.

Authors:  Edoardo Calizza; Maria Letizia Costantini; Giulio Careddu; Loreto Rossi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Stable isotopes of Hawaiian spiders reflect substrate properties along a chronosequence.

Authors:  Susan R Kennedy; Todd E Dawson; Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Time- and depth-wise trophic niche shifts in Antarctic benthos.

Authors:  Edoardo Calizza; Giulio Careddu; Simona Sporta Caputi; Loreto Rossi; Maria Letizia Costantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beyond polyphagy and opportunism: natural prey of hunting spiders in the canopy of apple trees.

Authors:  László Mezőfi; Gábor Markó; Csaba Nagy; Dávid Korányi; Viktor Markó
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Impact of Canopy Openness on Spider Communities: Implications for Conservation Management of Formerly Coppiced Oak Forests.

Authors:  Ondřej Košulič; Radek Michalko; Vladimír Hula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Caught in the web: Spider web architecture affects prey specialization and spider-prey stoichiometric relationships.

Authors:  Lorraine Ludwig; Matthew A Barbour; Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés; Angélica L González
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.