Keith E Kocher1, Adrianne N Haggins2, Amber K Sabbatini3, Kori Sauser4, Adam L Sharp5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: kkocher@umich.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI. 5. Los Angeles Medical Center Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although numerous studies have demonstrated a relationship between higher volume and improved outcomes in the delivery of health services, it has not been extensively explored in the emergency department (ED) setting. Therefore, we seek to examine the association between ED hospitalization volume and mortality for common high-risk conditions. METHODS: Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a national sample of hospital discharges, we evaluated mortality overall and for 8 different diagnoses between 2005 and 2009 (total admissions 17.55 million). These conditions were chosen because they are frequent (in the top 25 of all ED hospitalizations) and high risk (> 3% observed mortality). EDs were excluded from analysis if they did not have at least 1,000 total annual admissions and 30 disease-specific cases. EDs were then placed into quintiles based on hospitalized volume. Regression techniques were used to describe the relationship between volume (number of hospitalized ED patients per year) and both subsequent early inpatient mortality (within 2 days of admission) and overall mortality, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Mortality decreased as volume increased overall and for all diagnoses, but the relative importance of volume varied, depending on the condition. Absolute differences in adjusted mortality rates between very high-volume EDs and very low-volume EDs ranged from -5.6% for sepsis (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5% to -4.7%) to -0.2% for pneumonia (95% CI -0.6% to 0.1%). Overall, this difference was -0.4% (95% CI -0.6% to -0.3%). A similar pattern was observed when early hospital deaths were evaluated. CONCLUSION: Patients have a lower likelihood of inhospital death if admitted through high-volume EDs.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although numerous studies have demonstrated a relationship between higher volume and improved outcomes in the delivery of health services, it has not been extensively explored in the emergency department (ED) setting. Therefore, we seek to examine the association between ED hospitalization volume and mortality for common high-risk conditions. METHODS: Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a national sample of hospital discharges, we evaluated mortality overall and for 8 different diagnoses between 2005 and 2009 (total admissions 17.55 million). These conditions were chosen because they are frequent (in the top 25 of all ED hospitalizations) and high risk (> 3% observed mortality). EDs were excluded from analysis if they did not have at least 1,000 total annual admissions and 30 disease-specific cases. EDs were then placed into quintiles based on hospitalized volume. Regression techniques were used to describe the relationship between volume (number of hospitalized ED patients per year) and both subsequent early inpatient mortality (within 2 days of admission) and overall mortality, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Mortality decreased as volume increased overall and for all diagnoses, but the relative importance of volume varied, depending on the condition. Absolute differences in adjusted mortality rates between very high-volume EDs and very low-volume EDs ranged from -5.6% for sepsis (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5% to -4.7%) to -0.2% for pneumonia (95% CI -0.6% to 0.1%). Overall, this difference was -0.4% (95% CI -0.6% to -0.3%). A similar pattern was observed when early hospital deaths were evaluated. CONCLUSION:Patients have a lower likelihood of inhospital death if admitted through high-volume EDs.
Authors: Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Marcia M Ward; James C Torner Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; James C Torner Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Maureen E Canavan; Gail D'Onofrio; Brendan G Carr; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Shiva Nandiwada; Sunjidatul Islam; Jacob C Jentzer; P Elliott Miller; Christopher B Fordyce; Patrick Lawler; Carlos L Alviar; Louise Y Sun; Douglas C Dover; Renato D Lopes; Padma Kaul; Sean van Diepen Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2021-10-01
Authors: Margaret B Greenwood-Ericksen; Michelle L Macy; Jason Ham; Michele M Nypaver; Melissa Zochowski; Keith E Kocher Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2019-04-16
Authors: Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Uche E Okoro; Brian M Fuller; Kalyn Campbell; Morgan B Swanson; Stephen Q Simpson; Edith A Parker; Luke J Mack; Amanda Bell; Katie DeJong; Brett Faine; Anne Zepeski; Keith Mueller; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Christopher R Carpenter; Michael P Jones; Marcia M Ward Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Nicholas M Mohr; Kalyn D Campbell; Morgan B Swanson; Fred Ullrich; Kimberly A Merchant; Marcia M Ward Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2020-01-05 Impact factor: 6.344