Literature DB >> 25041323

Topographical relationship of the greater palatine artery and the palatal spine. Significance for periodontal surgery.

Sun-Kyoung Yu1, Myoung-Hwa Lee, Byung Sun Park, Yong Hyun Jeon, Yoon Young Chung, Heung-Joong Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: The aims of this study were to (1) identify the branching pattern and course of the greater palatine artery (GPA), (2) carry out a morphological analysis of the palatal bony prominence that divides the medial and lateral grooves and (3) characterize the topographical relationships between these two structures.
METHODS: Thirty-six hemimaxillae were studied with the aid of a surgical microscope to elucidate the GPA. A further 25 dry skulls were examined to establish the morphology of the palatal spine.
RESULTS: The most common GPA branching pattern was type I (41.7%, 15 sides), which gave off the medial and canine branches after the bony prominence. The distances from the CEJ to the lateral branch of the GPA were 9.04 ± 2.93 mm (canine), 11.12 ± 1.89 mm (first premolar), 13.51 ± 2.08 mm (second premolar), 13.76 ± 2.86 mm (first molar) and 13.91 ± 2.20 mm (second molar). The palatal spine was frequently observed as the bony prominence (66.3%, 57 sides), and was located at 6.49 ± 1.76 mm from the greater palatine foramen, with a length of 10.42 ± 2.45 mm. There was no a correlation between the bony prominence shape and the GPA branching pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: These results could provide the reference data regarding the topography of the GPA for periodontal surgery.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  greater palatine artery; lateral groove; palatal spine; periodontal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041323     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  7 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation of the bone and soft tissue thicknesses of the palate for using a miniscrew-supported maxillary skeletal expander.

Authors:  Sun-Kyoung Yu; Yonghwa Cho; Yo-Seob Seo; Jae-Sung Kim; Do Kyung Kim; Heung-Joong Kim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Color doppler ultrasound for the assessment of palatal fibromucosa thickness and the trajectory of the greater palatine artery: A pilot study.

Authors:  Raúl Sampietro-Martínez; Javier Pérez-Monreal; Alba Sánchez-Torres; Javier Bara-Casaus; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Endoscopic Endonasal Landmarks to the Greater Palatine Canal: A Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Raewyn G Campbell; C Arturo Solares; Eric C Mason; Daniel M Prevedello; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 4.  Flap Necrosis after Palatoplasty in Patients with Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of the neurovascular bundle position at the palate with cone beam computed tomography: an observational study.

Authors:  Hasan Guney Yilmaz; Aysa Ayali
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Preliminary evaluation of near-infrared vein visualization technology in the screening of palatal blood vessels.

Authors:  E Yaprak; S Kayaalti-Yuksek
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-01-01

7.  Anatomic factors influencing dimensions of soft tissue graft from the hard palate. A clinical study.

Authors:  Khalid N Said; Areej S Abu Khalid; Fathima F Farook
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-04-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.