BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traditionally dystonia has been considered a disorder of basal ganglia dysfunction. However, recent research has advocated a more complex neuroanatomical network. In particular, there is increasing interest in the pathophysiological role of the cerebellum. Patients with cervical and focal hand dystonia have impaired cerebellar associative learning using the paradigm eyeblink conditioning. This is perhaps the most direct evidence to date that the cerebellum is implicated in patients. METHODS: Eleven patients with DYT1 dystonia and five patients with DYT6 dystonia were examined and rates of eyeblink conditioning were compared with age-matched controls. A marker of brainstem excitability, the blink reflex recovery, was also studied in the same groups. RESULTS: Patients with DYT1 and DYT6 dystonia have a normal ability to acquire conditioned responses. Blink reflex recovery was enhanced in DYT1 but this effect was not seen in DYT6. CONCLUSIONS: If the cerebellum is an important driver in DYT1 and DYT6 dystonia our data suggest that there is specific cerebellar dysfunction such that the circuits essential for conditioning function normally. Our data are contrary to observations in focal dystonia and suggest that the cerebellum may have a distinct role in different subsets of dystonia. Evidence of enhanced blink reflex recovery in all patients with dystonia was not found and recent studies calling for the blink recovery reflex to be used as a diagnostic test for dystonic tremor may require further corroboration.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traditionally dystonia has been considered a disorder of basal ganglia dysfunction. However, recent research has advocated a more complex neuroanatomical network. In particular, there is increasing interest in the pathophysiological role of the cerebellum. Patients with cervical and focal hand dystonia have impaired cerebellar associative learning using the paradigm eyeblink conditioning. This is perhaps the most direct evidence to date that the cerebellum is implicated in patients. METHODS: Eleven patients with DYT1 dystonia and five patients with DYT6 dystonia were examined and rates of eyeblink conditioning were compared with age-matched controls. A marker of brainstem excitability, the blink reflex recovery, was also studied in the same groups. RESULTS: Patients with DYT1 and DYT6 dystonia have a normal ability to acquire conditioned responses. Blink reflex recovery was enhanced in DYT1 but this effect was not seen in DYT6. CONCLUSIONS: If the cerebellum is an important driver in DYT1 and DYT6 dystonia our data suggest that there is specific cerebellar dysfunction such that the circuits essential for conditioning function normally. Our data are contrary to observations in focal dystonia and suggest that the cerebellum may have a distinct role in different subsets of dystonia. Evidence of enhanced blink reflex recovery in all patients with dystonia was not found and recent studies calling for the blink recovery reflex to be used as a diagnostic test for dystonic tremor may require further corroboration.
Authors: Esther A R Nibbeling; Cathérine C S Delnooz; Tom J de Koning; Richard J Sinke; Hyder A Jinnah; Marina A J Tijssen; Dineke S Verbeek Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Petr Kaňovský; Raymond Rosales; Pavel Otruba; Martin Nevrlý; Lenka Hvizdošová; Robert Opavský; Michaela Kaiserová; Pavel Hok; Kateřina Menšíková; Petr Hluštík; Martin Bareš Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Anna Sadnicka; Lorenzo Rocchi; Anna Latorre; Elena Antelmi; James Teo; Isabel Pareés; Britt S Hoffland; Kristian Brock; Katja Kornysheva; Mark J Edwards; Kailash P Bhatia; John C Rothwell Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 9.698
Authors: Pichet Termsarasab; Ritesh A Ramdhani; Giovanni Battistella; Estee Rubien-Thomas; Melissa Choy; Ian M Farwell; Miodrag Velickovic; Andrew Blitzer; Steven J Frucht; Richard B Reilly; Michael Hutchinson; Laurie J Ozelius; Kristina Simonyan Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.881