Literature DB >> 25037622

Use of balloon expandable transcatheter valves for valve-in-valve implantation in patients with degenerative stentless aortic bioprostheses: Technical considerations and results.

Vinayak Bapat1, William Davies2, Rizwan Attia2, Jane Hancock2, Kirsty Bolter2, Christopher Young2, Simon Redwood2, Martyn Thomas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter valve-in-valve is an accepted treatment in high-risk patients with degenerative stented bioprostheses in the aortic position. Experience in treating stentless valves is, however, limited. Our aim was to determine the feasibility and single-center outcome of balloon expandable SAPIEN valve placement in degenerated stentless aortic valve bioprostheses.
METHODS: From February 2010 to January 2014, 10 patients with failing stentless bioprostheses underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, and SAPIEN 3) at our institution. Seven patients had valve failure due to regurgitation and three to stenosis. The mean age was 73.3 ± 15.0 years. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 31.8 ± 20.3, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.6 ± 5.4.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. One patient required immediate placement of a second valve owing to low placement of the first. Two intraoperative complications developed that needed additional procedures. One patient underwent immediate repair of a right ventricular perforation from a pacing lead, the other, reexploration for epicardial bleeding. No deaths occurred. The median length of stay was 8.5 days (range, 3-44). The mean follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 1-21). No late reoperations or reinterventions were required.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after previous stentless aortic valve replacement is technically demanding but a safe and feasible approach. The early results were excellent, with consistent improvement in hemodynamics. Prospective long-term follow-up in larger series is needed to evaluate this technique further.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037622     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dong-Fang Zhao; Nelson Wang; Ya Ruth Huo; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Limited root repair in acute type A aortic dissection is safe but results in increased risk of reoperation.

Authors:  Peter Chiu; Jeffrey Trojan; Sarah Tsou; Andrew B Goldstone; Y Joseph Woo; Michael P Fischbein
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Hemodynamic outcomes after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.

Authors:  R Yazan Kherallah; Srikanth Koneru; Zvonimir Krajcer; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Melissa L McCormack; Briana T Costello; Stephanie Coulter; Neil E Strickman; Juan Carlos Plana Gomez; Ali Mortazavi; Jose G Díez; James J Livesay; Joseph S Coselli; Guilherme V Silva
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

4.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated stentless aortic bioroots.

Authors:  Davut Cekmecelioglu; Ourania Preventza; Kathryn G Dougherty; Subhasis Chatterjee; Susan Y Green; Guilherme V Silva; Jose G Díez; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 5.  Technical pitfalls and tips for the valve-in-valve procedure.

Authors:  Vinayak Bapat
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 6.  Challenges in valve-in-valve therapy.

Authors:  Alia Noorani; Rahee Radia; Vinayak Bapat
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.

Authors:  Ross M Reul; Mahesh K Ramchandani; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bioprosthetic dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; An-Hsun Chou; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Hsin-Fu Lee; Kuang-Tso Lee; Pao-Hsien Chu; Yu-Ting Cheng; Shang-Hung Chang; Shao-Wei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How to Avoid Coronary Occlusion During TAVR Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Authors:  Roberto Valvo; Giuliano Costa; Marco Barbanti
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-11-19

10.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valve-in-valve: Future implications for the surgeon.

Authors:  Robert J Steffen; Vinayak N Bapat
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-02-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.