Literature DB >> 25037162

Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of tissue-specific-based and anatomical-based optical biomarkers for rapid detection of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Fangyao Hu1, Karthik Vishwanath1, H Wolfgang Beumer2, Liana Puscas2,3, Hamid R Afshari4, Ramon M Esclamado2, Richard Scher2, Samuel Fisher2, Justin Lo1, Christine Mulvey1, Nirmala Ramanujam1, Walter T Lee2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We propose the use of morphological optical biomarkers for rapid detection of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by leveraging the underlying tissue characteristics in aerodigestive tracts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffuse reflectance spectra were obtained from malignant and contra-lateral normal tissues of 57 patients undergoing panendoscopy and biopsy. Oxygen saturation, total hemoglobin concentration, and the reduced scattering coefficient were extracted. Differences in malignant and normal tissues were examined based on two different groupings: anatomical site and morphological tissue type. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were acquired from 252 sites, of which 51 were pathologically classified as SCC. Optical biomarkers exhibited statistical differences between malignant and normal samples. Contrast was enhanced when parsing tissues by morphological classification rather than anatomical subtype for unpaired comparisons. Corresponding linear discriminant models using multiple optical biomarkers showed improved predictive ability when accounting for morphological classification, particularly in node-positive lesions. The false-positive rate was retrospectively found to decrease by 34.2% in morphologically- vs. anatomically-derived predictive models. In glottic tissue, the surgeon exhibited a false-positive rate of 45.7% while the device showed a lower false-positive rate of 12.4%. Additionally, comparisons of optical parameters were made to further understand the physiology of tumor staging and potential causes of high surgeon false-positive rates. Optical spectroscopy is a user-friendly, non-invasive tool capable of providing quantitative information to discriminate malignant from normal head and neck tissues. Predictive models demonstrated promising results for real-time diagnostics. Furthermore, the strategy described appears to be well suited to reduce the clinical false-positive rate. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer detection; Cancer screening; Diffuse reflectance; Global health; Head and neck cancer; Hypoxia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037162      PMCID: PMC4229069          DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  47 in total

1.  Mie and Rayleigh modeling of visible-light scattering in neonatal skin.

Authors:  I S Saidi; S L Jacques; F K Tittel
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Detection of squamous cell carcinoma and corresponding biomarkers using optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  H Wolfgang Beumer; Karthik Vishwanath; Liana Puscas; Hamid R Afshari; Nimmi Ramanujam; Walter T Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Scaling method for fast Monte Carlo simulation of diffuse reflectance spectra from multilayered turbid media.

Authors:  Quan Liu; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 4.  Optical diagnostic techniques in the head and neck.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem Jerjes; Christian S Betz; Mohammed El Maaytah; Anthony Wright; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Dent Update       Date:  2007-09

5.  Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic performance of autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance in oral cancer detection: a clinical study.

Authors:  Jayaraj L Jayanthi; Narayanan Subhash; Manju Stephen; Emmanuel K Philip; Valappil T Beena
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.207

6.  Degradation of basement membranes by human matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysin).

Authors:  P A Bejarano; M E Noelken; K Suzuki; B G Hudson; H Nagase
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 7.  Optical techniques in diagnosis of head and neck malignancy.

Authors:  B Swinson; W Jerjes; M El-Maaytah; P Norris; C Hopper
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Cancer metastasis. Organ colonization and the cell-surface properties of malignant cells.

Authors:  G L Nicolson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1982-12-21

Review 9.  Profiling early head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Keith D Hunter; E Ken Parkinson; Paul R Harrison
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of confocal laser-scanning microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of malignant skin tumors.

Authors:  Armin Gerger; Silvia Koller; Wolfgang Weger; Erika Richtig; Helmut Kerl; Hellmut Samonigg; Peter Krippl; Josef Smolle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dark field optical imaging reveals vascular changes in an inducible hamster cheek pouch model during carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Fangyao Hu; Robert Morhard; Helen A Murphy; Caigang Zhu; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Oxygen and Perfusion Kinetics in Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy in FaDu Head and Neck Cancer Xenografts Are Related to Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Nimmi Ramanujam; Mark W Dewhirst; Fangyao Hu; Karthik Vishwanath; Joseph K Salama; Alaattin Erkanli; Bercedis Peterson; James R Oleson; Walter T Lee; David M Brizel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 7.038

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.