Literature DB >> 2503666

[The effect of preoperative parenteral nutrition on the perioperative course in patients with esophageal cancer].

C Ebener1, H Becker, R Heicappell, C Ohmann, H D Röher.   

Abstract

In 35 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy the nutritional status was evaluated. 15 patients were estimated to be malnourished and were therefore treated by total parental nutrition (TPN) for 7 days. In the control group (n = 20, no TPN) the nutritional status was normal. TPN corrected abnormal serum parameters with short half-life time. Therefore the nutritional status of both groups was equal at time of operation. The postoperative clinical outcome of both groups was as follows: In TPN-treated patients postoperative hospital stay for 26 days was shorter compared to 32 days in controls, no patients died (vs n = 4), no patient developed sepsis (vs n = 4), no patient developed acute renal failure (vs n = 3). These differences did not reach levels of significance due to the small patient groups. In conclusion our study shows that patients with esophageal cancer and regarded as well nourished seemed to suffer from nutritional deficits. Assessment of the nutritional status by commonly used nutritional parameters does not reveal these deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2503666     DOI: 10.1007/bf01359555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  18 in total

1.  Percentage of weight loss: a basic indicator of surgical risk in patients with chronic peptic ulcer. 1936.

Authors:  H O Studley
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  General surgery-important advances in clinical medicine: preoperative nutrition therapy.

Authors:  H Silberman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1983-02

Review 3.  Influence of nutritional status on the resumption of adequate food intake in patients recovering from colorectal cancer operations.

Authors:  M M Meguid; M M Mughal; D Debonis; V Meguid; J J Terz
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Preoperative parenteral feeding in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Müller; U Brenner; C Dienst; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prediction of operative morbidity and mortality by preoperative nutritional assessment.

Authors:  J L Mullen; G P Buzby; M T Waldman; M H Gertner; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1979

6.  Total parenteral nutrition versus gastrostomy in the preoperative preparation of patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  S T Lim; R G Choa; K H Lam; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The efficacy of nutritional assessment and support in cancer surgery.

Authors:  B F Smale; J L Mullen; G P Buzby; E F Rosato
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effects of perioperative hyperalimentation on complications in patients with carcinoma and weight loss.

Authors:  A R Holter; J E Fischer
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Serum albumin and body weight as predictors of postoperative course in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D M Hickman; R A Miller; J L Rombeau; P L Twomey; C F Frey
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1980 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Biological measures for the formulation of a hospital prognostic index.

Authors:  K B Harvey; L L Moldawer; B R Bistrian; G L Blackburn
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Significance of preoperative weight loss for perioperative metabolic adaptation and surgical risk in patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  A Weimann; H J Meyer; M J Müller; P Stenkhoff; J Miholic; J Jähne; O Selberg; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.